Technical Papers
Dec 28, 2017

Effects of Last Planner System Practices on Social Networks and the Performance of Construction Projects

Publication: Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Volume 144, Issue 3

Abstract

Management practices of lean production within the last planner system (LPS) have enabled significant improvements in project performance worldwide. These improvements are, in part, attributed to practices that strengthen social networks within projects and enhance effective communication. However, the relationships by which LPS management practices and organizational characteristics impact project performance are not well known and require in-depth investigation. To obtain a better understanding of these relationships, analyzed data was collected from nine construction projects from two Chilean construction companies. Correlation analysis was applied to the degree of implementation of LPS practices, social networks metrics, and key performance indicators (KPIs). Significant relationships were found among these three variables. It was also found that a high implementation level of LPS practices is usually related to improved project performance, although it is not always associated with improved network metrics. The results provide insights into project performance relationships with the organization and LPS practices that should lead to improve the managerial decision-making process regarding organizational and management practices for better project performance. The role of social network properties on project performance requires further research because optimal metrics have not been established yet.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

All data generated or analyzed during the study are included in the published paper. Information about the Journal’s data sharing policy can be found here: http://ascelibrary.org/doi/10.1061/%28ASCE%29CO.1943-7862.0001263.

Acknowledgments

We thank the companies that provided access for data collection for this study.

References

Abraham, A., Hassanien, A.-E., and Snášel, V. (2009). Computational social network analysis: Trends, tools and research advances, Springer, London.
Ackoff, R. L. (1971). “Towards a system of systems concepts.” Manage. Sci., 17(11), 661–671.
Alarcón, D. M., Alarcón, I. M., and Alarcón, L. F. (2013). “Social network analysis: A diagnostic tool for information flow in the AEC industry.” Proc., 21st Annual Conf. of the Int. Group for Lean Construction, Fortaleza, Brazil, 947–956.
Alarcón, L. F., Diethelm, S., Rojo, O., and Calderón, R. (2008). “Assessing the impacts of implementing lean construction.” Revista Ingeniería de Construcción, 23(1), 26–33.
Aramo-Immonen, H., and Vanharanta, H. (2009). “Project management: The task of holistic systems thinking.” Hum. Factors Ergon. Manuf., 19(6), 582–600.
Beatham, S., Anumba, C., Thorpe, T., and Hedges, I. (2004). “KPIs: A critical appraisal of their use in construction.” Benchmarking Int. J., 11(1), 93–117.
Bertelsen, S. (2003). “Construction as a complex system.” Proc., 11th Annual Conf. of the Int. Group for Lean Construction, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA.
Castillo, T., Alarcón, L. F., Salvatierra, J. L., and Alarcón, D. (2015). “Analyzing the interrelation between management practices, organizational characteristics and performance indicators for construction companies.” Proc., 23th Annual Conf. of the Int. Group for Lean Construction, Perth, Australia, 691–700.
Cherven, K. (2015). Mastering Gephi network visualization, Packt Publishing, Birmingham, U.K.
Daft, R. L. (2012). Organizational theory and design, Cengage Learning, Boston.
Easley, D., and Kleinberg, J. (2010). Networks, crowds, and markets: Reasoning about a highly connected world, Cambridge University Press, New York.
Evans, J. R. (2012). Statistics, data analysis, and decision modeling, Pearson Press, Upper Saddle River, NJ.
Gyadu-Asiedu, W. (2014). “Construction project performance measurement: A review of the philosophies, concepts and paradigms.” ADRRI J., 5(5), 74–91.
Krackhardt, D., and Hanson, J. R. (1993). “Informal networks: The company behind the chart.” Harv. Bus. Rev., 71(4), 104–111.
Leal, M., and Alarcón, M. (2010). “Quantifying impacts of last planner implementation in industrial mining projects.” Proc., 18th Annual Conf. of the Int. Group for Lean Construction, Haifa, Israel, 518–527.
Lin, S. (2015). “An analysis for construction engineering networks.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 04014096.
Mehany, M. S. H. M. (2015). “Lean construction principles past and present—A business model consistency.” Proc., 51st ASC Annual Int. Conf., ASC, Fort Collins, CO, 371–377.
Moses, L. E. (1952). “Non-parametric statistics for psychological research.” Psychol. Bull., 49(2), 122–143.
Mossman, A. (2011). “Last planner collaborative conversations for predictable design & construction delivery.” ⟨http://www.thechangebusiness.co.uk/sites/default/files/downloads/LastPlanner2009-05-21.pdf⟩ (Jun. 15, 2017).
NIST/SEMATECH (National Institute of Standards and Technology/Semiconductor Manufacturing Technology). (2015). “e-handbook of statistical methods.” ⟨http://www.itl.nist.gov/div898/handbook⟩ (May 25, 2017).
Page, S. (2009). “The interesting in-between: Why complexity exists.” ⟨http://docslide.us/documents/06-04-09-the-interesting-in-between-why-complexity-exists-scott-e-page-university.html⟩ (May 25, 2017).
Priven, V., and Sacks, R. (2015). “Effects of the last planner system on social networks among construction trade crews.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 4015006.
Priven, V., and Sacks, R. (2016). “Impacts of the social subcontract and last planner system interventions on the trade-crew workflows of multistory residential construction projects.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 1–14.
R version 3.1.2 [Computer software]. R Core Team, Vienna, Austria.
Radosavljevic, M., and Bennett, J. (2012). Construction management strategies: A theory of construction management, Wiley, Chichester, U.K.
Radujković, M., Vukomanović, M., and Dunović, I. B. (2010). “Application of key performance indicators in South Eastern European construction.” J. Civ. Eng. Manag., 16(4), 521–530.
Ramırez, R., Alarcón, L. F., and Knights, P. (2004). “Benchmarking system for evaluating management practices in the construction industry.” J. Manage. Eng., 20(3), 110–117.
Rödder, W., Brenner, D., and Kulmann, F. (2014). “Entropy based evaluation of net structures: Deployed in social network analysis.” Expert Syst. Appl., 41(17), 7968–7979.
Schalcher, H. R. (2010). “Complexity in construction.” 3rd Int. Holcim Forum 2010, Holcim Foundation, Zurich, Switzerland, 1–8.
Scott, J. (2013). Social network analysis, Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA.
Shan, Y., Goodrum, P. M., Zhai, D., Haas, C., and Caldas, C. H. (2011). “The impact of management practices on mechanical construction productivity.” Constr. Manage. Econ., 29(3), 305–316.
Sibiya, M., Aigbavboa, C., and Thwala, W. (2015). “Construction projects’ key performance indicators: A case of the South African construction industry.” ICCREM 2015: Environment and the Sustainable Building, Lulea, Sweden, 521–531.
Textoris, R., and Tanzi, T. J. (2013). “Reflection on a model of accident reporting to help to implement efficient prevention strategies.” Proc., IEEE 8th Int. Conf. on System of Systems Engineering (SoSE), IEEE, New York, 6.
Viana, D., Mota, B., Formoso, C. T., Echeveste, M., Peixoto, M., and Rodrigues, C. L. (2010). “A survey on the last planner system: Impacts and difficulties for implementation in Brazilian companies.” Proc., 18th Annual Conf. of the Int. Group for Lean Construction, Haifa, Israel, 497–507.
Weaver, W. (1948). “Science and complexity.” Am. Sci., 36(4), 536–544.
Zeffane, R., Tipu, S. A., and Ryan, J. C. (2011). “Communication, commitment & trust: Exploring the triad.” Int. J. Bus. Manage., 6(6), 77–87.
Zheng, X., Le, Y., Chan, A. P. C., Hu, Y., and Li, Y. (2016). “Review of the application of social network analysis (SNA) in construction project management research.” Int. J. Project Manage., 34(7), 1214–1225.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Volume 144Issue 3March 2018

History

Received: Mar 3, 2017
Accepted: Sep 7, 2017
Published online: Dec 28, 2017
Published in print: Mar 1, 2018
Discussion open until: May 28, 2018

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Tito Castillo [email protected]
Ph.D. Candidate, Dept. of Construction Engineering and Management, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Vicuña Mackenna 4860, Macul, Santiago, Chile; Researcher, Facultad de Ingeniería, Universidad Nacional de Chimborazo, Avda. Antonio José de Sucre, Km 1.5 Vía a Guano, Riobamba EC060108, Ecuador (corresponding author). E-mail: [email protected]
Luis F. Alarcón, Ph.D., A.M.ASCE [email protected]
Professor, Dept. of Construction Engineering and Management, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Vicuña Mackenna 4860, Macul, Santiago, Chile. E-mail: [email protected]
José Luis Salvatierra, Ph.D. [email protected]
Senior Consultant, Academia Graña y Montero, Ave. Paseo de la República 4667 Office, C-401, Surquillo, Lima 34, Peru. E-mail: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share