Technical Papers
Dec 15, 2017

Maintenance Cost Optimization for Bridge Structures Using System Reliability Analysis and Genetic Algorithms

Publication: Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Volume 144, Issue 2

Abstract

Maintenance cost optimization and performance prediction of bridge structures have become important challenges in bridge management systems. The performance of bridge structures should be carefully monitored, especially in severe climatic conditions. The objective of this study is to develop a rational method that predicts the most cost-effective intervention schedule for bridges, where the structural safety is maintained with the minimum possible lifecycle cost. The framework functions through (1) a central database that contains the asset inventory along with the maintenance actions list, (2) a biquadratic system reliability–based deterioration model, (3) an intervention effect model that simulates the effect of undertaking various intervention scenarios on the bridge superstructure performance, (4) a financial model that computes the lifecycle costs throughout the planning horizon, and (5) an optimization model that utilizes a genetic algorithms engine to compare the different intervention scenarios and selects the most cost-effective one. This method is applied to a simply supported bridge superstructure case study, designed in accordance with Canadian highway bridge design standards. The results indicate that undertaking less costly minor repair actions may considerably reduce the lifecycle costs as a result of decreasing the number of costly major interventions. The optimum scenario resulted in an equivalent uniform annual cost of US$8,277 per year, which shows 4.5 times cost saving as compared with the conventional scenario where only major repairs are performed. This innovative combination of reliability analysis, nonlinear finite-element modeling, and genetic algorithms optimization supports asset managers in long-term planning and ensures undertaking rational and objective decisions.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

Data generated or analyzed during the study are available from the corresponding author by request. Information about the Journal’s data sharing policy can be found here: http://ascelibrary.org/doi/10.1061/%28ASCE%29CO.1943-7862.0001263.

References

AASHTO. (2004). AASHTO LRFD bridge design specifications, Washington, DC.
Bisby, L. A. (2006). “An introduction to life cycle engineering and costing for innovative infrastructure.” Queen’s Univ., Kingston, ON, Canada.
Bolukbasi, M., Mohammadi, J., and Arditi, D. (2004). “Estimating the future condition of highway bridge components using National Bridge Inventory data.” Pract. Period. Struct. Des. Constr., 16–25.
Canada Infrastructure. (2016). “Canadian infrastructure report card.” ⟨http://www.canadainfrastructure.ca/downloads/Canadian_Infrastructure_Report_2016.pdf⟩ (Jan. 20, 2016).
Chang, C. K., Christensen, M. J., and Zhang, T. (2001). “Genetic algorithms for project management.” Ann. Software Eng., 11(1), 107–139.
CSA (Canadian Standards Association). (2006). “Canadian highway bridge design code (CHBDC).” CAN/CSA-S6-06, Mississauga, Canada.
Cusson, D., Lounis, Z., and Daigle, L. (2011). “Durability monitoring for improved service life predictions of concrete bridge decks in corrosive environments.” Comput. -Aided Civ. Infrastruct. Eng., 26(7), 524–541.
Czarnecki, A. A., and Nowak, A. S. (2007). “Reliability-based evaluation of steel girder bridges.” Proc. Inst. Civ. Eng. Bridge Eng., 160(1), 9–15.
Evolver [Computer software]. Palisade Europe, West Drayton, U.K.
Frangopol, D., Kong, J., and Gharaibeh, E. (2001). “Reliability-based life-cycle management of highway bridges.” J. Comput. Civ. Eng., 27–34.
Frangopol, D. M., and Neves, L. C. (2004). “Probabilistic life-cycle analysis of deteriorating structures under multiple performance constraints.” Proc., 2004 Structures Congress—Building on the Past: Securing the Future, ASCE, Reston, VA, 85–92.
Ghodoosi, F., Bagchi, A., and Zayed, T. (2015). “System-level deterioration model for reinforced concrete bridge decks.” J. Bridge Eng., 04014081.
Ghodoosi, F., Bagchi, A., and Zayed, T. (2016). “Reliability-based condition assessment of an externally restrained bridge deck system considering uncertainties in key design parameters.” J. Perform. Constr. Facil., 04014189.
Grussing, M. N., Uzarski, D. R., and Marrano, L. R. (2006). “Condition and reliability prediction models using the Weibull probability distribution.” Proc., Ninth Int. Conf. on Applications of Advanced Technology in Transportation, ASCE, Reston, VA, 19–24.
Hag-Elsafi, O., Alampalli, S., and Kunin, J. (2001). “Application of FRP laminates for strengthening of a reinforced-concrete T-beam bridge structure.” Compos. Struct., 52(3–4), 453–466.
Kong, J., and Frangopol, D. (2003). “Life-cycle reliability-based maintenance cost optimization of deteriorating structures with emphasis on bridges.” J. Struct. Eng., 818–828.
Liu, Y., and Weyers, R. E. (1998). “Modeling the time-to-corrosion cracking in chloride contaminated reinforced concrete structures.” ACI Mater., 95(6), 675–681.
Maunsell and Transport Research Laboratory. (1998). “Strategic review of bridge maintenance costs: Report on 1997/98 review.”, The Highways Agency, London.
Maunsell and Transport Research Laboratory. (1999). “Strategic review of bridge maintenance costs: Report on 1998 review.”, The Highways Agency, London.
McDaniel, M., Celaya, M., and Nazarian, M. (2010). “Concrete bridge deck quality mapping with seismic methods: Case study in Texas.” Transp. Res. Rec., 2202, 53–60.
Mirza, S. (2009). “Canadian infrastructure crisis still critical.” ⟨https://www.renx.ca/PDF2/09-Mirza-ppp.pdf⟩ (Jan. 18, 2017).
Miyamoto, A., Kawamura, K., and Nakamura, H. (2000). “Bridge management system and maintenance optimization for existing bridges.” Comput. -Aided Civ. Infrast. Eng., 15(1), 45–55.
Nielson, B. G. (2005). “Analytical fragility curves for highway bridges in moderate seismic zones.” Ph.D. dissertation, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta.
Nowak, A. S. (1993). “Live load model for highway bridges.” Struct. Saf., 13(1–2), 53–66.
Nowak, A. S. (1999). “Calibration of LRFD bridge design code.”, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC.
Nowak, A. S., and Collins, K. R. (2000). Reliability of structures, McGraw-Hill, Boston.
Rens, K. L., and Nogueira, C. L. (2005). “Bridge management and non-destructive evaluation.” J. Perform. Constr. Facil., 3–16.
SAP2000 version 15 [Computer software]. Computers and Structures, Berkeley, CA.
Tang, K. S., Man, K. F., Kwong, S., and He, Q. (1996). “Genetic algorithms and their applications.” IEEE Sig. Process. Mag., 13(6), 22–37.
Tavares, D. H., Padgett, J. E., and Paultre, P. (2012). “Fragility curves of typical as-built highway bridges in eastern Canada.” Eng. Struct., 40, 107–118.
Uddin, W., Hudson, W. R., and Hass, R. (2013). Public infrastructure asset management, McGraw-Hill, New York.
Vu, K. T., Stewart, M. G., and Mullard, J. (2005). “Corrosion-induced cracking: Experimental data and predictive models.” ACI Struct., 102(5), 719–726.
Weseman, W. A. (1995). “Recording and coding guide for the structure inventory and appraisal of the nation’s bridges.”, Federal Highway Administration, U.S. Dept. of Transportation, Washington, DC.
Weyers, R. E. (1998). “Service life model for concrete structures in chloride laden environments.” ACI Mater., 95(4), 445–453.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Volume 144Issue 2February 2018

History

Received: Mar 20, 2017
Accepted: Aug 7, 2017
Published online: Dec 15, 2017
Published in print: Feb 1, 2018
Discussion open until: May 15, 2018

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Farzad Ghodoosi [email protected]
Research Associate, Dept. of Building, Civil, and Environmental Engineering, Concordia Univ., Montreal, QC, Canada H3G 1M8 (corresponding author). E-mail: [email protected]
Soliman Abu-Samra [email protected]
Research Assistant, Dept. of Building, Civil, and Environmental Engineering, Concordia Univ., Montreal, QC, Canada H3G 1M8. E-mail: [email protected]
Mehran Zeynalian [email protected]
Assistant Professor, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Univ. of Isfahan, 81767-37841 Isfahan, Iran. E-mail: [email protected]
Tarek Zayed, F.ASCE [email protected]
Professor, Dept. of Building, Civil, and Environmental Engineering, Concordia Univ., Montreal, QC, Canada H3G 1M8. E-mail: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share