Technical Papers
Nov 10, 2017

3D Visualization-Based Ergonomic Risk Assessment and Work Modification Framework and Its Validation for a Lifting Task

Publication: Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Volume 144, Issue 1

Abstract

The construction manufacturing industry in North America has a disproportionately high number of lost-time injuries because of the high physical demand of the labor-intensive tasks it involves. It is thus essential to investigate the physical demands of body movement in the construction manufacturing workplace to proactively identify worker exposure to ergonomic risk. This paper proposes a methodology to use three-dimensional (3D) skeletal modeling to imitate human body movement in an actual construction manufacturing plant for ergonomic risk assessment of a workstation. The inputs for the creation of an accurate and reliable 3D model are also identified. Through 3D modeling, continuous human body motion data can be obtained (such as joint coordinates and joint angles) for risk assessment analysis using existing risk assessment algorithms. The presented framework enables risk evaluation by detecting awkward body postures and evaluating the handled force/load and frequency that cause ergonomic risks during manufacturing operations. The results of the analysis are expected to facilitate the development of modified work to the workstation, which will potentially reduce injuries and workers’ compensation insurance costs in the long term for construction manufacturers. The proposed framework can also be expanded to evaluate workstations in the design phase without the need for physical imitation by human subjects. In this paper, the proposed 3D visualization-based ergonomic risk assessment methodology is validated through an optical marker-based motion capture experiment for a lifting task in order to prove the feasibility and reliability of the framework. It is also compared to the traditional manual observation method. Three subjects are selected to conduct the experiment and three levels of comparison are completed: joint angles comparison, risk rating comparison for body segments, and Rapid Entire Body Assessment/Rapid Upper Limb Assessment (REBA/RULA) total risk rating and risk level comparison.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

Data generated or analyzed during the study are available from the corresponding author by request. Information about the Journal’s data sharing policy can be found here: http://ascelibrary.org/doi/10.1061/%28ASCE%29CO.1943-7862.0001263.

Acknowledgments

This study was funded by the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC) through the Industrial Research Chair (IRC) in the Industrialization of Building Construction (File No. IRCPJ 419145-15), Engage Grant EGP470391, and Discovery Grants RGPIN 402046, RGPIN 436051, and RGPIN-2017-06721. The authors would also like to acknowledge the support from their industry partner, All Weather Windows, as well as the contributions of Amin Komeili and Justin Lewicke, who assisted with and participated in the experiment. And special thanks are extended to the Glenrose Rehabilitation Hospital for allowing the authors to complete the experiment in their motion capture lab.

References

3ds Max [Computer software]. Autodesk, San Rafael, CA.
Al-Hussein, M., Niaz, M. A., Yu, H., and Kim, H. (2005). “Integrating 3D visualization and simulation for tower crane operations on construction site.” Autom. Constr., 15(5), 554–562.
Alwasel, A., Elrayes, K., Abdel-Rahman, E. M., and Haas, C. T. (2011). “Sensing construction work-related musculoskeletal disorders (WMSDs).” Proc., Int. Symp. on Automation and Robotics in Construction (ISARC), International Association for Automation and Robotics in Construction, London, 164–169.
Ceseracciu, E., Sawacha, Z., and Cobelli, C. (2014). “Comparison of markerless and marker-based motion capture technologies through simultaneous data collection during gait: Proof of concept.” PLoS One, 9(3), e87640.
David, G. C. (2005). “Ergonomic methods for assessing exposure to risk factors for work-related musculoskeletal disorders.” Occup. Med., 55(3), 190–199.
Dennis, P. (2002). Lean production simplified, 2nd Ed., Productivity Press, New York.
Eichelberger, P., et al. (2016). “Analysis of accuracy in optical motion capture: A protocol for laboratory setup evaluation.” J. Biomech., 49(10), 2085–2088.
Feyen, R., Liu, Y., Chaffin, D., Jimmerson, G., and Joseph, B. (2000). “Computer-aided ergonomics: A case study of incorporating ergonomics analyses into workplace design.” Appl. Ergon., 31(3), 291–300.
Golabchi, A., Han, S., and Robinson Fayek, A. (2016). “A fuzzy logic approach to posture-based ergonomic analysis for field observation and assessment of construction manual operations.” Can. J. Civ. Eng., 43(4), 294–303.
Golabchi, A., Han, S., Seo, J., Han, S., Lee, S., and Al-Hussein, M. (2015). “An automated biomechanical simulation approach to ergonomic job analysis for workplace design.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 04015020.
Han, S., and Lee, S. (2013). “A vision-based motion capture and recognition framework for behavior-based safety management.” Autom. Constr., 35, 131–141.
Han, S., Lee, S., and Peña-Mora, F. (2013). “Vision-based detection of unsafe actions of a construction worker: Case study of ladder climbing.” J. Comput. Civ. Eng., 635–644.
Han, S. H., Hasan, S., Bouferguene, A., Al-Hussein, M., and Kosa, J. (2014). “Utilization of 3D visualization of mobile crane operations for modular construction on-site assembly.” J. Manage. Eng., 9.
Hignett, S., and McAtamney, L. (2000). “Rapid entire body assessment (REBA).” Appl. Ergon., 31(2), 201–205.
Inyang, N., and Al-Hussein, M. (2011). “Ergonomic hazard quantification and rating of residential construction tasks.” Proc., Canadian Society for Civil Engineering (CSCE) Annual Conf., Canadian Society for Civil Engineering, Montréal.
Janowitz, I. L., et al. (2006). “Measuring the physical demands of work in hospital settings: Design and implementation of an ergonomics assessment.” Appl. Ergon., 37(5), 641–658.
Kamat, V. R., Martinez, J. C., Fischer, M., Golparvar-Fard, M., Peña-Mora, F., and Savarese, S. (2011). “Research in visualization techniques for field construction.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 853–862.
Karhu, O., Kansi, P., and Kuorinka, I. (1977). “Correcting working postures in industry: A practical method for analysis.” Appl. Ergon., 8(4), 199–201.
Levanon, Y., Lerman, Y., Gefen, A., and Ratzon, N. Z. (2014). “Validity of the modified RULA for computer workers and reliability of one observation compared to six.” Ergonomics, 57(12), 1856–1863.
Li, C., and Lee, S. (2011). “Computer vision techniques for worker motion analysis to reduce musculoskeletal disorders in construction.” Proc., Int. Workshop on Computing in Civil Engineering, ASCE, Reston, VA, 380–387.
Li, G., and Buckle, P. (1999). “Current techniques for assessing physical exposure to work-related musculoskeletal risks, with emphasis on posture-based methods.” Ergonomics, 42(5), 674–695.
Li, X., Komeili, A., Gül, M., and El-Rich, M. (2017). “A framework for evaluating muscle activity during repetitive manual material handling in construction manufacturing.” Autom. Constr., 79, 39–48.
Manrique, J. D., Al-Hussein, M., Telyas, A., and Funston, G. (2007). “Constructing a complex precast tilt-up panel structure utilizing an optimization model, 3D CAD, and animation.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 199–207.
McAtamney, L., and Corlett, E. N. (1993). “RULA: A survey method for investigation of work related upper limb disorders.” Appl. Ergon., 24(2), 91–99.
Middlesworth, M. (2012). “A step-by-step guide: Rapid entire body assessment (REBA).” ⟨www.ergo-plus.com⟩ (Jan. 15, 2016).
Mitropoulos, P., Cupido, G., and Namboodiri, M. (2009). “Cognitive approach to construction safety: Task demand-capability model.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 881–889.
Motion Analysis. (2016). “Motion analysis.” ⟨http://www.motionanalysis.com⟩ (Jan. 15, 2015).
Mündermann, L., Corazza, S., and Andriacchi, T. P. (2006). “The evolution of methods for the capture of human movement leading to markerless motion capture for biomechanical applications.” J. NeuroEng. Rehabil., 3(6), 11.
OSACH (Ontario Safety Association for Community and Healthcare). (2010). “Musculoskeletal disorders prevention series. 1: MSD prevention guideline for Ontario.” ⟨http://www.osach.ca/misc_pdf⟩ (Mar. 15, 2015).
Ray, S. J., and Teizer, J. (2012). “Real-time construction worker posture analysis for ergonomics training.” Adv. Eng. Inf., 26(2), 439–455.
Schneider, S. P. (2001). “Musculoskeletal injuries in construction: A review of the literature.” Appl. Occup. Environ. Hyg., 16(11), 1056–1064.
Seo, J., Han, S., Lee, S., and Kim, H. (2015a). “Computer vision techniques for construction safety and health monitoring.” Adv. Eng. Inf., 29(2), 239–251.
Seo, J., Lee, S., Armstrong, T. J., and Han, S. (2013). “Dynamic biomechanical simulation for identifying risk factors for work-related musculoskeletal disorders during construction tasks.” Proc., Int. Symp. on Automation and Robotics in Construction and Mining (ISARC), International Association for Automation and Robotics in Construction, London, 1074–1084.
Seo, J., Starbuck, R., and Han, S. (2015b). “Motion data-driven biomechanical analysis during construction tasks on sites.” J. Comput. Civ. Eng., B4014005.
Spielholz, P., Silverstein, B., Morgan, M., Checkoway, H., and Kaufman, J. (2001). “Comparison of self-report, video observation and direct measurement methods for upper extremity musculoskeletal disorder physical risk factors.” Ergonomics, 44(6), 588–613.
Staub-French, S., Russell, A., and Tran, N. (2008). “Linear scheduling and 4D visualization.” J. Comput. Civ. Eng., 192–205.
University of Michigan. (2012). “3D static strength prediction program.” ⟨http://djhurij4nde4r.cloudfront.net/attachments/files/000/000/284/original/Manual_606.pdf?1406656210⟩ (Jul. 15, 2016).
Van der Molen, H. F., Mol, E., Kuijer, P. P. F. M., and Frings-Dresen, M. H. W. (2007). “The evaluation of smaller plasterboards on productivity, work demands and workload in construction workers.” Appl. Ergon., 38(5), 681–686.
Wang, D., Dai, F., and Ning, X. (2015). “Risk assessment of work-related musculoskeletal disorders in construction: State-of-the-art review.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 04015008.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Volume 144Issue 1January 2018

History

Received: Feb 16, 2017
Accepted: Jun 29, 2017
Published online: Nov 10, 2017
Published in print: Jan 1, 2018
Discussion open until: Apr 10, 2018

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Xinming Li, Ph.D.
Postdoctoral Fellow, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada T6G 1H9.
SangHyeok Han, Ph.D.
Assistant Professor, Dept. of Building, Civil and Environmental Engineering, Concordia Univ., Montréal, QC, Canada H3G 1M8.
Mustafa Gül, Ph.D., A.M.ASCE [email protected]
Associate Professor, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada T6G 1H9 (corresponding author). E-mail: [email protected]
Mohamed Al-Hussein, Ph.D.
Professor, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada T6G 1H9.
Marwan El-Rich, Ph.D.
Associate Professor, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada T6G 1H9; Associate Professor, Dept. of Mechanical Engineering, Khalifa Univ., Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates 127788.

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share