Case Studies
Nov 23, 2017

Industrialized Building Companies’ Business Models: Multiple Case Study of Swedish and North American Companies

Publication: Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Volume 144, Issue 2

Abstract

Industrialized building companies apply various product predefinition strategies, derived from market- or resource-based strategic perspectives. This strongly affects the buildup of such companies’ business models and their operational structure. Ten companies were included in a case study, presenting strategic orientations and business models. The aim of this study was to analyze the primary characteristics of different business models applied by industrialized building companies, further describe their strategic orientations, and picture different paths of business model development. The emergence of industrialized building companies implies that new offerings and new roles for the building market is explored to lead to competitive advantages. This study showed that a key driver is to use deep customer knowledge to develop competitive end-product offers aimed at certain customer segments, achieving high customer value. Further findings were that a good fit and balance between the business model corner stones—offering, operational platform and market position—are crucial for industrialized building companies’ success. Business models for industrialized building companies evolve over time and lead to a fine-tuned balance and, thereby, increase fit. Differences and similarities between the studied companies’ business models and strategic orientations were affected by the surrounding market conditions. This study contributes to the theoretical buildup of business models and strategic orientations of industrialized building companies, and contributes to practitioners’ understanding of industrialized building companies from a strategic, company perspective.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

All data generated or analyzed during the study are included in the published paper. Information about the Journal’s data sharing policy can be found here: http://ascelibrary.org/doi/10.1061/%28ASCE%29CO.1943-7862.0001263.

References

Amit, R., and Zott, C. (2001). “Value creation in e-business.” Strategic Manage. J., 22(6–7), 493–520.
Baden-Fuller, C., and Morgan, M. S. (2010). “Business models as models.” Long Range Plann., 43(2), 156–171.
Barlow, J., Childerhouse, P., Gann, D., Hong-Minh, S., Naim, M., and Ozaki, R. (2003). “Choice and delivery in housebuilding: Lessons from Japan for UK housebuilders.” Build. Res. Inf., 31(2), 134–145.
Barlow, J., and Ozaki, R. (2003). “Achieving ‘customer focus’ in private housebuilding: Current practice and lessons from other industries.” Hous. Stud., 18(1), 87–101.
Blismas, N., Pasquire, C., and Gibb, A. (2006). “Benefit evaluation for off-site production in construction.” Constr. Manage. Econ., 24(2), 121–130.
Brege, S., Stehn, L., and Nord, T. (2014). “Business models in industrialized building of multi-storey houses.” Constr. Manage. Econ., 32(1–2), 208–226.
Casadesus-Masanell, R., and Ricart, J. E. (2010). “From strategy to business models and onto tactics.” Long Range Plann., 43(2), 195–215.
Demil, B., and Lecocq, X. (2010). “Business model evolution: In search of dynamic consistency.” Long Range Plann., 43(2), 227–246.
De Wit, B., and Meyer, R. (2010). Strategy: Process, content, context: An international perspective, Cengage Learning EMEA, Andover, MA.
Gann, D. M. (1996). “Construction as a manufacturing process? Similarities and differences between industrialized housing and car production in Japan.” Constr. Manage. Econ., 14(5), 437–450.
Gibb, A. G. F. (2001). “Standardization and pre-assembly—Distinguishing myth from reality using case study research.” Constr. Manage. Econ., 19(3), 307–315.
Gibb, A. G. F., and Isack, F. (2003). “Re-engineering through pre-assembly: Client expectations and drivers.” Build. Res. Inf., 31(2), 146–160.
Goulding, J. S., Pour Rahimian, F., Arif, M., and Sharp, M. (2014). “New offsite production and business models in construction: Priorities for the future research agenda.” Archit. Eng. Des. Manage., 11(3), 163–184.
Hedman, J., and Kalling, T. (2003). “The business model concept: Theoretical underpinnings and empirical illustrations.” Eur. J. Inf. Syst., 12(1), 49–59.
Hvam, L., Mortensen, N. H., and Riis, J. (2008). Product customization, Springer, Leipzig, Germany.
Jansson, G., Johnsson, H., and Engström, D. (2014). “Platform use in systems building.” Constr. Manage. Econ., 32(1–2), 70–82.
Jensen, P., Lidelöw, H., and Olofsson, T. (2015). “Product configuration in construction.” Int. J. Mass Customisation, 5(1), 73–92.
Johnsson, A. P. H. (2011). “The building system as a strategic asset in industrialised construction.” 6th Nordic Conf. on Construction Economics and Organisation, Aalborg Univ., Aalborg, Denmark, 541.
Johnsson, H. (2013). “Production strategies for pre-engineering in house-building: Exploring product development platforms.” Constr. Manage. Econ., 31(9), 941–958.
Johnsson, H., and Rudberg, M. (2014). “Classification of production systems for industrialized building: A production strategy perspective.” Constr. Manage. Econ., 32(1–2), 53–69.
Lessing, J. (2006). Industrialised house-building: Concept and processes, Dept. of Construction Sciences, Lund Univ., Lund, Sweden.
Lessing, J., and Brege, S. (2015). “Business models for product-oriented house-building companies-experience from two Swedish case studies.” Constr. Innovation, 15(4), 449–472.
Lessing, J., Stehn, L., and Ekholm, A. (2015). “Industrialised house-building—Development and conceptual orientation of the field.” Constr. Innovation, 15(3), 378–399.
Lidelöw, H., Stehn, L., Lessing, J., and Engström, D. (2015). Industriellt husbyggande, Studentlitteratur AB, Lund, Sweden.
Lincoln, Y. S., and Guba, E. G. (1990). “Judging the quality of case study reports.” Int. J. Qual. Stud. Educ., 3, 53–59.
Magretta, J. (2002). “Why business models matter.” Harv. Business Rev., 2002, 3–8.
Mcgrawhill-Construction. (2011). “Prefabrication and modularization: Increasing productivity in the construction industry.”, Bedford, MA.
Merriam, S. B. (1998). “Qualitative research and case study applications in education.” ERIC, San Francisco.
Meyer, M., and Lehnerd, A. (1997). The power of product platforms: Building value and cost leadership, Free Press, New York.
Mintzberg, H. (1983). Structure in fives: Designing effective organizations, Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ.
National Research Council. (2009). “Advancing the competitiveness and efficiency of the US construction industry.” National Academy of Sciences, Washington, DC.
Osterwalder, A., Pigneur, Y., and Tucci, C. L. (2005). “Clarifying business models: Origins, present, and future of the concept.” Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst., 16, 1.
Pan, W., Gibb, A. G., and Dainty, A. R. (2012). “Strategies for integrating the use of off-site production technologies in house building.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 1331–1340.
Pan, W., and Goodier, C. (2012). “House-building business models and off-site construction take-up.” J. Archit. Eng., 84–93.
Porter, M. (1985). Competitive advantage: Creating and sustaining superior performance, Free Press, New York.
Porter, M. E. (1996). “What is strategy?” Harv. Business Rev., 74, 61–78.
Prahalad, C., and Hamel, G. (1990). “The core competence of the corporation.” Harv. Business Rev., 68, 79–91.
Robertson, D., and Ulrich, K. (1998). “Planning for product platforms.” Sloan Manage. Rev., 39, 19–31.
Schoenwitz, M., Naim, M., and Potter, A. (2012). “The nature of choice in mass customized house building.” Constr. Manage. Econ., 30(3), 203–219.
Smith, R. E. (2015). Permanent modular construction—Process practice performance, Univ. of Utah, Salt Lake City.
Stake, R. E. (1995). The art of case study research/Robert E. Stake, Sage, London.
Teece, D. J., Pisano, G., and Shuen, A. (1997). “Dynamic capabilities and strategic management.” Strategic Manage. J., 18(7), 509–533.
Ulrich, K. T., and Eppinger, S. D. (2011). Product design and development/Karl T. Ulrich, Steven D. Eppinger, McGraw-Hill/Irwin, New York.
Ward, A. C., Shook, J., and Sobek, D. (2007). Lean product and process development, Lean Enterprise Institute, Cambridge, MA.
Wernerfelt, B. (1984). “A resource-based view of the firm.” Strategic Manage. J., 5(2), 171–180.
Winch, G. M. (2003). “Models of manufacturing and the construction process: The genesis of re-engineering construction.” Build. Res. Inf., 31(2), 107–118.
Yin, R. K. (2003). Case study research: Design and methods, 3rd Ed., Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA.
Zott, C., and Amit, R. (2008). “The fit between product market strategy and business model: Implications for firm performance.” Strategic Manage. J., 29(1), 1–26.
Zott, C., Amit, R., and Massa, L. (2011). “The business model: Recent developments and future research.” J. Manage., 37(4), 1019–1042.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Volume 144Issue 2February 2018

History

Received: Jun 17, 2016
Accepted: Apr 7, 2017
Published online: Nov 23, 2017
Published in print: Feb 1, 2018
Discussion open until: Apr 23, 2018

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Jerker Lessing, Ph.D. [email protected]
Researcher, Dept. of Building and Environmental Technology, Lund Univ., P.O. Box 118, SE-221 00 Lund, Sweden (corresponding author). E-mail: [email protected]
Staffan Brege [email protected]
Professor, Dept. of Management and Engineering, Linköping Univ., SE-581 83 Linköping, Sweden. E-mail: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share