Abstract

The pursuit of Faster Fast Track or Flash Track is deemed necessary in today’s industry for reasons such as emergency rebuilds, competitive market advantage, and regulatory compliance. Flash Tracking has been defined as a time-driven project, which by necessity requires a heightened degree of concurrency between engineering, procurement, and construction. This paper reports on Flash Track readiness assessment algorithms that were developed to enable an organization to assess its readiness to execute time-critical or Flash Track projects. The readiness assessment algorithms were developed by defining the relative importance of 47 essential Flash Track practices, grouped into 6 categories using the analytic hierarchy process (AHP). The weights of the practices and categories were determined by a 15-member industry expert panel, comprised of 15 Construction Industry Institute (CII) member companies representing owners, contractors, and engineering organizations. The algorithms were ultimately integrated into a Flash Track toolkit. In a validation exercise, representatives from 13 completed Flash Track projects used the toolkit with reference to their projects. Project representatives’ retrospective self-assessment of readiness to perform the projects on a Flash Track basis were moderately to strongly correlated (r=0.76) with their readiness assessment forecasted by this research’s algorithms. This research provides the first quantitative measurement suitable to assess an organization’s readiness to undertake the unique challenges of a Flash Track project.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Acknowledgments

This research was funded by the Construction Industry Institute. The opinions, findings, and conclusions are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the views of CII. CII funding is greatly appreciated. We would like to acknowledge the wealth of knowledge received by the following individuals from CII member companies who collaborated with the authors over two years: Bob Kohlburn, MC Industrial; Cleve Whitener, Lauren Engineers and Constructors; Dale Sullivan, S&B Engineers and Constructors; Don Cahill, TVA; Marty Gamble, Alstom; Jesse Gyöngyös, ExxonMobil; John Strickland, CH2M Hill; Keith Critzer, ExxonMobil; Larry Garrett, Phillips 66; Mike Giambra, Matrix Service Company; Rob Rainbolt, Burns and McDonnell; Ron Reynolds, Yates Construction; Travis Oates, ATC; and Victor Galotti, Georgia Pacific.

References

Alhomadi, A. A., Dehghan, R., and Ruwanpura, J. Y. (2011). “The predictability of fast-track projects.” Procedia Eng., 14, 1966–1972.
Austin, R. B., Pishdad-Bozorgi, P., and de la Garza, J. M. (2015a). “Identifying and prioritizing best practices to achieve flash track projects.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 04015077.
Austin, R. B., Pishdad-Bozorgi, P., and de la Garza, J. M. (2015b). “Successful delivery of flash track projects.”, Construction Industry Institute, Austin, TX.
Ballard, G., Cho, S. K., Kim, Y. W., and Azari, R. (2012). “Starting from scratch: A new project delivery Paradigm.”, Construction Industry Institute, Austin, TX.
Bynum, S. D. (1983). “Construction management and design build from the perspective of a general contractor.” Law Contemp. Prob., 46(1), 25–38.
Construction Industry Institute. (2015). Flash track tool, implementation resource 311-2, Austin, TX.
de la Garza, J. M., Alcantara, P., Kapoor, M., and Ramesh, P. S. (1994). “Value of concurrent engineering for the AEC industry.” J. Manage. Eng., 3(46), 46–55.
Duggan, T. (2013). “Design-build project delivery market share and market size report.” 〈https://www.dbia.org/resource-center/Documents/rsmeansreport_2013rev.pdf〉 (Feb. 28, 2015).
Eastham, G. (2002). The fast track manual: A guide to schedule reduction for clients and contractors on engineering and construction projects, European Construction Institute, Loughborough, U.K.
Elvin, G. (2003). “Proven practices in design-build and fast track.” Archit. Eng., 1–8.
Foster, C. A. (1983). “Construction management and design build/fast track construction: A solution which uncovers a problem for the surety.” Law Contemp. Prob., 46(1), 95–125.
Horsey, S., Taylor, J. E., and de la Garza, J. M. (2014). “Deploying best practices in unfamiliar countries.”, Construction Industry Institute, Austin, TX.
Ibrahim, C., Costello, S., and Wilkinson, S. (2013). “Development of a conceptual team integration performance index for alliance projects.” Constr. Manage. Econ., 31(11), 1128–1143.
Knecht, B. (2002). “Fast track construction becomes the norm.” Archit. Rec., 190(2), 123.
Lichtig, W. A. (2006). “The integrated agreement for lean project delivery.” Constr. Lawyer, 26(3), 1–8.
Pishdad-Bozorgi, P., Austin, R. B., and de la Garza, J. M. (2016). “Flash track practices distilled via structured interviews from EPC projects.” ASCE Construction Research Congress, San Juan, Puerto Rico.
Pishdad-Bozorgi, P., and Beliveau, Y. J. (2016a). “A schema of trust-building attributes and their corresponding integrated project delivery traits.” Int. J. Constr. Educ. Res, 12(2), 142–160.
Pishdad-Bozorgi, P., and Beliveau, Y. J. (2016b). “Symbiotic relationships between integrated project delivery (IPD) and trust.” Int. J. Constr. Educ. Res., in press.
Saaty, T. L. (1990). “How to make a decision: The analytic hierarchy process.” Eur. J. Oper. Res., 48(1), 9–26.
Saaty, T. L. (2006). Fundamentals of decision making and probability theory, RWS Publications, Pittsburgh.
Saaty, T. L. (2012). Decision making for leaders, RWS Publications, Pittsburgh.
Salazar, G., Serrambana, V., Denny, T., and Farrell, T. (1994). The cost-trust relationship in the construction industry, SD 100, Construction Industry Institute, Austin, TX.
Salem, O., and Miller, R. (2008). “Best practices for design in fast track projects.”, Construction Industry Institute, Austin, TX.
Skibniewski, M. J., and Chao, L. (1992). “Evaluation of advanced construction technology with AHP method.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 577–593.
Smock, R. (1992). “Fast-track, low-cost construction starts with the owner.” Power Eng., 96(2), 19–24.
Songer, A. D., and Diekmann, J. (2000). “Re-engineering the EPC process.”, Construction Industry Institute, Austin, TX.
Tighe, J. J. (1991). “Benefits of fast tracking are a myth.” Int. J. Project Manage., 9(1), 49–51.
Vorster, M. C., Magrongan, S. A., and McNeil, B. W. (1998). “PEpC: A breakthrough project delivery system that improves performance by reforming owner, contractor, supplier relationships.”, Construction Industry Institute, Austin, TX.
Williams, G. V. (1995). “Fast track pros and cons: Considerations for industrial projects.” J. Manage. Eng., 24–32.
Yitmen, I. (2007). “The challenge of change for innovation in construction: A North Cyprus perspective.” Build. Environ., 42(3), 1319–1328.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Volume 142Issue 12December 2016

History

Received: Jan 4, 2016
Accepted: Apr 6, 2016
Published online: Jun 17, 2016
Discussion open until: Nov 17, 2016
Published in print: Dec 1, 2016

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Pardis Pishdad-Bozorgi, Ph.D., A.M.ASCE [email protected]
Assistant Professor, School of Building Construction, Georgia Tech, 280 Ferst Dr., Atlanta, GA 30332 (corresponding author). E-mail: [email protected]
Jesus M. de la Garza, Ph.D., Dist.M.ASCE [email protected]
Vecellio Professor, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Virginia Tech, 750 Drillfield, Blacksburg, VA 24061. E-mail: [email protected]
Robert B. Austin, Ph.D., P.E., M.ASCE [email protected]
Ph.D. Graduate, School of Building Construction, Georgia Tech, 280 Ferst Dr., Atlanta, GA 30332. E-mail: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share