Introduction to Techniques for Resolving Project Performance Contradictions
Publication: Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Volume 142, Issue 8
Abstract
Improving project performance has always been emphasized in construction projects. When project objectives contradict, the project manager must apply mitigating or conflict resolution strategies to remove or minimize the level of contradiction in order to enhance project performance. A typical example is conflict between cost and schedule, where cost tends to increase when the schedule is crashed (sped up). Although some of the current project control systems attempt to diagnose the root cause of performance deviations and suggest corrective action, none is designed to resolve conflicts in a systematic and innovative manner to improve the project performance. The purpose of this paper is to present a systematic and structured approach to guide project managers to propose corrective action plans that lead to minimal conflict and ultimately to better project performance. Resolving contradictions can generate effective corrective action plans that would enhance project performance. Conflicts among competing project performance indices such as cost, schedule, safety, and quality are obvious in any project. This innovative approach uses the theory of inventive problem solving (TRIZ) to develop a framework for a conflict resolution strategy called techniques for resolving project performance contradictions (TRAC), or the techniques for resolving performance contradictions. TRAC provides an algorithmic approach for solving performance contradictions in order to optimize the overall project performance. TRAC is a user-oriented methodology and presents a new model for performance problem solving to assist project managers in their corrective action exercise. TRAC methodology is demonstrated in two case studies that indicate the workability of this model and its usefulness in resolving performance contradictions in contraction projects.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
Altshuller, G. (1998). 40 principles: TRIZ keys to technical innovation, L. Shulyak, and S. Rodman, eds., Technical Innovation Center, Worcester, MA.
Altshuller, G. (2000). The innovation algorithm: TRIZ, systematic innovation, and technical creativity, L. Shulyak and S. Rodman, eds., Technical Innovation Center, Worcester, MA.
Chang, H. T., and Chen, J. L. (2004). “The conflict-problem-solving CAD software integrating TRIZ into eco-innovation.” Adv. Eng. Software, 35(8–9), 553–566.
Coskun, K., and Altun, C. M. (2011). “Application of TRIZ to in-situ construction techniques.” Proc., 2nd Int. Conf., Const. and Project Manage., IPEDR, Vol. 15, IACSIT Press, Singapore, 171–175.
De Marco, A., Briccarello, D., and Rafele, C. (2009). “Cost and schedule monitoring of industrial building projects: Case study.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 853–862.
Domb, E. (2000). “Managing creativity for project success.” Proc., 7th Project Leadership Conf., PQR Group, Upland, CA.
Dull, C. B. (1999). “Comparing and combining value engineering and TRIZ techniques.” Proc., SAVE Int. Conf., Vol. 34, SAVE International, Dayton, OH, 71–76.
Fey, V., and Rivin, E. (1997). The science of innovation: A managerial overview of the TRIZ methodology, TRIZ Group, Southfield, MI.
Kourmaev, R., and Teplitskiy, A. (2003). “Application of inventing problem-solving theory (TRIZ) in pipeline technologies.” Proc., ASCE Pipelines, ASCE, Reston, VA, 1465–1471.
Mann, D., and Cathain, C. O. (2001). “40 inventive (architecture) principles with examples.” 〈http://www.triz-journal.com/40-inventive-architecture-principles-examples〉 (Mar. 11, 2004).
Mann, D., and Domb, E. (1999). “40 inventive (business) principles with examples.” 〈http://www.triz-journal.com/40-inventive-business-principles-examples/〉 (Mar. 11, 2004).
Mao, X., Zhang, X., and AbouRizk, S. (2009). “Enhancing value engineering process by incorporating inventive problem-solving techniques.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 416–424.
Marsh, D. G., Waters, F. H., and Marsh, T. D. (2004). “40 inventive principles with applications in education.” 〈http://www.triz-journal.com/40-inventive-principles-applications-education/〉 (Jun. 16, 2004).
Mohamed, Y. (2002). “A framework for systematic improvement of construction systems.” Ph.D. thesis, Univ. of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada.
Mohamed, Y., and AbouRizk, S. (2005a). “Application of the theory of inventive problem solving in tunnel construction.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 1099–1108.
Mohamed, Y., and AbouRizk, S. (2005b). “Technical knowledge consolidation using theory of inventive problem solving.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 993–1001.
Olawale, Y., and Sun, M. (2013). “PCIM: Project control and inhibiting-factors management model.” J. Manage. Eng., 60–70.
Rantanen, K., and Domb, E. (2002). Simplified TRIZ: New problem-solving applications for engineers & manufacturing professionals, CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL.
Retseptor, G. (2003). “40 inventive principles in quality management.” 〈http://www.triz-journal.com/40-inventive-principles-quality-management/〉 (Jan. 12, 2005).
Royzen, Z. (1993). “Application TRIZ in value management and quality improvement.” Proc., Int. Conf. Society of American Value Engineers (SAVE), SAVE International, Dayton, OH, 94–101.
Russell, A., and Fayek, A. (1994). “Automated corrective action selection assistant.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 11–33.
Savransky, S. D. (2000). Engineering of creativity: Introduction to TRIZ methodology of inventive problem solving, CRC Press, New York.
Stratton, R., and Mann, D. (2003). “Systematic innovation and the underlying principles behind TRIZ and TOC.” J. Mat. Process. Tech., 139(1–3), 120–126.
Stratton, R., and Warburton, R. D. H. (2003). “The strategic integration of agile and lean supply.” Int. J. of Product. Econ., 85(2), 183–198.
Terninko, J. (2001). “40 inventive principles with social examples.” 〈http://www.triz-journal.com/40-inventive-principles-social-examples/〉 (Jun. 16, 2004).
TRIZ Journal. (1997). “Contradiction matrix.” 〈http://www.triz-journal.com/contradiction-matrix/〉 (Nov. 10, 2004).
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
© 2016 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: Jun 2, 2015
Accepted: Dec 8, 2015
Published online: Feb 23, 2016
Discussion open until: Jul 23, 2016
Published in print: Aug 1, 2016
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.