Technical Papers
Feb 9, 2016

The Real Option Value of Renegotiation in Public–Private Partnerships

Publication: Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Volume 142, Issue 8

Abstract

Public–private partnerships (PPP) are contracts with a long-lasting period, huge relationship-specific investment, and great uncertainties. In many PPP projects, it is difficult or even impossible to write a complete contract that specifies all contingencies, so a renegotiation-allowed contract could be better than a renegotiation-proof one. Under a renegotiation-allowed PPP agreement, renegotiations can significantly influence the interests of both the private party and the government, so they have to evaluate the benefit and cost of renegotiations ex ante and consider them in the tender price. This study considers renegotiations as real options that are embodied to provide flexibilities for PPP contracts, and develops a model to capture the value of renegotiation based on real option theory. The model is proposed in three steps, including modeling underlying risk, bargaining renegotiation payoffs, and determining real option value. An illustration case is presented to demonstrate the applicability of the model. The case study shows that if a renegotiation-allowed contract is used, then (1) contractor-led renegotiation is very likely to occur, especially at the early stage of concession while government-led renegotiation is less likely to occur, and if any, it should occur at the middle stage of concession; (2) one party could use opportunistic renegotiation to hold the other party up and ask for excessive compensation, so renegotiations must be regulated; and (3) renegotiation in a PPP project may have a huge real option value, and the higher the uncertainty, the higher the renegotiation value.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Acknowledgments

This study is financially supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Project Number 71472052).

References

Alonso-Conde, A. B., Brown, C., and Rojo-Suarez, J. (2007). “Public private partnerships: Incentives, risk transfer and real options.” Rev. Financial Econ., 16(4), 335–349.
Amram, M., and Kulatilaka, N. (1999). Real options: Managing strategic investment in an uncertain world, Harvard Business School Press, Boston.
Ashuri, B., Kashani, H., Molenaar, K. R., Lee, S., and Lu, J. (2012). “Risk-neutral pricing approach for evaluating BOT highway projects with government minimum revenue guarantee options.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 545–557.
Bajari, P., and Tadelis, S. (2001). “Incentives versus transaction costs: A theory of procurement contracts.” RAND J. Econ., 32(3), 387–407.
Bennett, J., and Iossa, E. (2006). “Building and managing facilities for public services.” J. Public Econ., 90(10), 2143–2160.
Brandao, L. E. T., and Saraiva, E. (2008). “The option value of government guarantees in infrastructure projects.” Constr. Manage. Econ., 26(11), 1171–1180.
Chan, H., and Levitt, R. E. (2011). “To talk or to fight? Effects of strategic, cultural, and institutional factors on renegotiation approaches in public–private concessions.” Global projects: Institutional and political challenges, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England, 310–348.
Chang, C., and Chou, H. (2014). “Transaction-cost approach to the comparative analysis of user-pay and government-pay public-private partnership systems.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 04014039.
Chiara, N., Garvin, M. J., and Vecer, J. (2007). “Valuing simple multiple-exercise real options in infrastructure projects.” J. Infrastruct. Syst., 97–104.
Cruz, C. O., and Marques, R. C. (2012). “Flexible contracts to cope with uncertainty in public-private partnerships.” Int. J. Project Manage., 31(3), 11.
Cruz, C. O., and Marques, R. C. (2013a). “Endogenous determinants for renegotiating concessions: Evidence from local infrastructure.” Local Government Stud., 39(3), 352–374.
Cruz, C. O., and Marques, R. C. (2013b). “Exogenous determinants for renegotiating public infrastructure concessions: Evidence from Portugal.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 139(9), 9.
Cui, Q., Johnson, P., Quick, A., and Hastak, M. (2008). “Valuing the warranty ceiling clause on New Mexico Highway 44 using a binomial lattice model.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 10–17 .
De Brux, J. (2010). “The dark and bright sides of renegotiation: An application to transport concession contracts.” Util. Policy, 18(2), 77–85.
Dewatripont, M. (1988). “Commitment through renegotiation-proof contracts with third parties.” Rev. Econ. Stud., 55(3), 377–390.
Dudkin, G., and Välilä, T. (2005). “Transaction costs in public-private partnerships: A first look at the evidence.” Econ. Financial Rep., 307–331.
Duggan, M. G. (2000). “Hospital ownership and public medical spending.” Q. J. Econ., 115(4), 1343–1373.
Fishburn, P. C., and Rubinstein, A. (1982). “Time preference.” Int. Econ. Rev., 23(3), 677–694.
Fudenberg, D., and Tirole, J. (1990). “Moral hazard and renegotiation in agency contracts.” Econ.: J. Econ. Soc., 58(6), 1279–1319.
Galera, A. L. L., and Soliño, A. S. (2010). “A real options approach for the valuation of highway concessions.” Transp. Sci., 44(3), 416–427.
Garvin, M. J., and Cheah, C. Y. (2004). “Valuation techniques for infrastructure investment decisions.” Constr. Manage. Econ., 22(4), 373–383.
Grossman, S. J., and Hart, O. D. (1986). “The costs and benefits of ownership: A theory of vertical and lateral integration.” J. Political Econ., 94(4), 691–719.
Guasch, J. L., Laffont, J. J., and Straub, S. (2008). “Renegotiation of concession contracts in Latin America: Evidence from the water and transport sectors.” Int. J. Ind. Organiz., 26(2), 421–442.
Guasch, L. (2004). Granting and renegotiating infrastructure concessions: Doing it right, World Bank, Washington, DC.
Hart, O. (2003). “Incomplete contracts and public ownership: Remarks, and an application to public-private partnerships.” Econ. J., 113(486), C69–C76.
Hart, O., and Moore, J. (1988). “Incomplete contracts and renegotiation.” Econ.: J. Econ. Soc., 56(4), 755–785.
Hart, O., Shleifer, A., and Vishny, R. W. (1997). “The proper scope of government: Theory and an application to prisons.” Q. J. Econ., 112(4), 1127–1161.
Hart, O. D., and Tirole, J. (1988). “Contract renegotiation and Coasian dynamics.” Rev. Econ. Stud., 55(4), 509–540.
HM Treasury. (2007). “Standardisation of PFI contracts (SoPC) version 4.” 〈http://www.hm-treasury.gov.uk/d/pfi_sopc4pu101_210307.pdf〉 (Mar. 26, 2010).
Ho, S. P., and Liu, L. Y. (2002). “An option pricing-based model for evaluating the financial viability of privatized infrastructure projects.” Constr. Manage. Econ., 20(2), 143–156.
Kruger, N. A. (2012). “To kill a real option—Incomplete contracts, real options and PPP.” Transp. Res. Part A-Policy Pract., 46(8), 1359–1371.
Liu, J., Yu, X., and Cheah, C. Y. J. (2013). “Evaluation of restrictive competition in PPP projects using real option approach.” Int. J. Project Manage., 32(3), 473-481.
Maskin, E., and Moore, J. (1999). “Implementation and renegotiation.” Rev. Econ. Stud., 66(1), 39–56.
Maskin, E., and Tirole, J. (1999). “Two remarks on the property-rights literature.” Rev. Econ. Stud., 66(1), 139–149.
Myerson, R. B. (2013). Game theory: Analysis of conflict, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
National Audit Office. (2009). “Performance of PFI construction.” 〈http://www.nao.org.uk/publications/0809/pfi_construction.aspx〉 (Dec. 12, 2011).
Park, T., Kim, B., and Kim, H. (2013). “Real option approach to sharing privatization risk in underground infrastructures.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 685–693 .
Segal, I. (1999). “Complexity and renegotiation: A foundation for incomplete contracts.” Rev. Econ. Stud., 66(1), 57–82.
Shen, L. Y., Bao, H. J., Wu, Y. Z., and Lu, W. S. (2007). “Using bargaining-game theory for negotiating concession period for BOT-type contract.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 385–392 .
Smit, H. (2003). “Infrastructure investment as a real options game: The case of European airport expansion.” Financial Manage., 32(4), 27–57.
Smit, H. T., and Trigeorgis, L. (2012). Strategic investment: Real options and games, Princeton University Press, NJ.
Soliño, A. S., and Gago de Santos, P. (2010). “Transaction costs in transport public-private partnerships: Comparing procurement procedures.” Transp. Rev., 30(3), 389–406.
Tirole, J. (2009). “Cognition and incomplete contracts.” Am. Econ. Rev., 99(1), 265–294.
Trigeorgis, L. (1995). Real options in capital investment: Models, strategies, and applications, Greenwood Publishing Group, Westport, CT.
Wibowo, A., Permana, A., Kochendörfer, B., Kiong, R. T. L., Jacob, D., and Neunzehn, D. (2012). “Modeling contingent liabilities arising from government guarantees in Indonesian BOT/PPP toll roads.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 1403–1410 .
Williamson, O. E. (1985). The economic institutions of capitalism, Simon and Schuster, New York.
Woodhouse, E. J. (2006). “IPP study case selection and project outcomes: An additional note.” 〈http://iis-db.stanford.edu/pubs/21262/IPP_Study_-_Country_and_Project_Annex.pdf〉 (Dec. 12, 2013).
Xiong, W., and Zhang, X. (2014). “Concession renegotiation models for projects developed through public-private partnerships.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 04014008 .
Zhao, T., and Tseng, C.-L. (2003). “Valuing flexibility in infrastructure expansion.” J. Infrastruct. Syst., 89–97.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Volume 142Issue 8August 2016

History

Received: Apr 9, 2015
Accepted: Nov 24, 2015
Published online: Feb 9, 2016
Discussion open until: Jul 9, 2016
Published in print: Aug 1, 2016

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Ph.D. Candidate, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Hong Kong Univ. of Science and Technology, Clear Water Bay, Kowloon, Hong Kong, China. E-mail: [email protected]
Xueqing Zhang [email protected]
Associate Professor, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Hong Kong Univ. of Science and Technology, Clear Water Bay, Kowloon, Hong Kong, China (corresponding author). E-mail: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share