Technical Papers
Apr 12, 2016

Exposing Uncertainty in Bid Preparation of Steel Construction Cost Estimating: II. Comparative Analysis and Quantitative C-I-V-I-L Classification

Publication: Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Volume 142, Issue 10

Abstract

Bid prices vary greatly based on assumptions about uncertain conditions. In steel construction bidding, the contingency amount is typically used as a bid line item to factor in the unexpected—including impact of uncertainty—to the lump-sum bid price. Therefore, the goal of this research is to explore the impacts of uncertainties that contribute to contingency amounts. The costs of uncertainties in bid documents of several real-world school projects have been calculated. Contributions to the body of knowledge are (1) providing illustrative examples of real-world uncertainties from the data set; (2) statistically analyzing the relative occurrence and cost significance to increase estimators’ awareness when they evaluate uncertainties; and (3) comparing the cost significance from the data with officially recommended contingency percentages. This research enables steel estimators to make quantitative-based decisions on contingencies in their estimates should various major types of uncertainties arise without an opportunity to resolve them.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

References

AACEi (Association for the Advancement of Cost Engineering International). (2011). “Recommended Practice No. 18R-97: Cost estimate classification system—As applied in engineering, procurement, and construction for the process industries.” TCM Framework: 7.3—Cost Estimating and Budgeting, Morgantown, WV, 〈www.aacei.org/non/rps/18r-97.pdf〉 (Oct. 27, 2014).
AISC. (2005). Code of standard practice for steel buildings and bridges, Chicago.
Angelis, L., and Stamelos, I. (2000). “A simulation tool for efficient analogy based cost estimation.” Empirical Software Eng., 5(1), 35–68.
Bilginsoy, C., and Philips, P. (2000). “Prevailing wage regulations and school construction costs: Evidence from British Columbia.” J. Educ. Finance, 25(3), 415–431.
Blok, F. G. (1982). “Contingency: Definition, classification and probability.” Transactions of the 7th Int. Cost Engineering Congress, T. Bridgwater, ed., Association of Cost Engineers, London, B3-1–B3-8.
BLS (Bureau of Labor Statistics). (2010a). “May 2010 national industry-specific occupational employment and wage estimates: NAICS 236000–Construction of buildings.” U.S. Dept. of Labor, Washington, DC, 〈http://www.bls.gov/oes/2010/may/naics3_236000.htm〉 (Jul. 17, 2014).
BLS (Bureau of Labor Statistics). (2010b). “Washington-Baltimore-Northern Virginia, DC-MD-VA-WV, National Compensation Survey, April 2010.” 〈http://www.bls.gov/ncs/ocs/sp/ncbl1604.pdf〉 (Jul. 17, 2014).
BLS (Bureau of Labor Statistics). (2011). “May 2011 national industry-specific occupational employment and wage estimates: NAICS 236000–Construction of buildings: 47,0000 construction and extraction occupations.” 〈http://www.bls.gov/oes/2011/may/oessrci.htm〉 (Jul. 17, 2014).
Carr, R. I. (1989). “Cost estimating principles.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 545–551.
DOE (U.S. Dept. of Energy). (1997). “Cost estimating guide: Chapter 4: Types of cost estimates.”, Types of Cost Estimates. U.S. Dept. of Energy, Washington, DC, 〈https://www.directives.doe.gov/directives/0430.1-EGuide-1-Chp04/view〉 (Jul. 17, 2014).
DOE (U.S. Dept. of Energy). (2011). “Cost estimating guide.”, Washington, DC, 〈https://www.directives.doe.gov/directives/0413.3-EGuide-21/view〉 (Jul. 17, 2014).
DOL (U.S. Department of Labor). (2014). “The Davis-Bacon Act, as amended.” Davis-Bacon Act, Pub.L. 71-798, Washington, DC, 〈http://www.dol.gov/whd/regs/statutes/dbra.htm〉 (Oct. 17, 2014).
DOL (U.S. Department of Labor). (2014). “Wage determinations OnLine.gov” Washington, DC, 〈http://www.wdol.gov/dba.aspx〉 (Jul. 17, 2014).
Duzkale, A. K., and Lucko, G. (2016). “Exposing uncertainty in bid preparation of steel construction cost estimating: I. Conceptual framework and qualitative C-I-V-I-L classification.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 04016049.
Freire, J., and Alarcón, L. F. (2002). “Achieving lean design process: Improvement methodology.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 248–256.
Günhan, S., and Arditi, D. (2007). “Budgeting owner’s construction contingency.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 492–497.
Ho, S., and Liu, L. Y. (2004). “Analytical model for analyzing construction claims and opportunistic bidding.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 94–104.
Lee, G., Eastman, C. M., and Zimring, C. (2003). “Avoiding design errors: A case study of redesigning an architectural studio.” Des. Stud., 24(5), 411–435.
Liu, L., and Zhu, K. (2007). “Improving cost estimates of construction projects using phased cost factors.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 91–95.
Lopes, M. E. R. F., and Forster, C. H. Q. (2013). “Application of human error theories for the process improvement of requirements engineering.” Inform. Sci., 250, 142–161.
Love, P. E. D., Lopez, R., Goh, Y. M., and Davis, P. R. (2011). “Systemic modelling of design error causation in social infrastructure projects.” Procedia Eng., 14, 161–168.
Mak, S., and Picken, D. (2000). “Using risk analysis to determine construction project contingencies.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 130–136.
Norman, D. A. (1990). The design of everyday things, Doubleday, New York.
Reason, J. (1990). Human error, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, U.K.
Rothwell, G. S. (2004). “Cost contingency as the standard deviation of the cost estimate for cost engineering.” 〈http://web.stanford.edu/group/siepr/cgi-bin/siepr/?q=system/files/shared/pub s/papers/pdf/04-05.pdf〉 (Oct. 27, 2014).
Safin, S., Leclercq, P., and Blavier, A. (2008). “Errors in architectural design process: Towards a cognitive model.” Proc., 2008 10th Int. Design Conf., D. Marjanovic, M. Storga, N. Pavkovic, and N. Bojcetic, eds., Univ. of Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia, 1057–1064.
Shelton, F., and Brugh, M. (2002). “Indirect costs of contracts.” J. Constr. Account. Taxat., 12(4), 3–9.
Sherwin-Williams. (2012). “Tools, charts and tables, surface preparation standards.” Cleveland, 〈http://protective.sherwin-williams.com/pdf/tools-charts-list/surface_preparation_standards.pdf〉 (Jul. 17, 2014).

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Volume 142Issue 10October 2016

History

Received: May 13, 2015
Accepted: Nov 11, 2015
Published online: Apr 12, 2016
Discussion open until: Sep 12, 2016
Published in print: Oct 1, 2016

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Abdulhamit Kayihan Duzkale, Ph.D., A.M.ASCE [email protected]
Postdoctoral Research Associate, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Catholic Univ. of America, Washington, DC 20064; Director, Hittite Steel, Sterling, VA 20166. E-mail: [email protected]
Gunnar Lucko, Ph.D., A.M.ASCE [email protected]
Associate Professor, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Catholic Univ. of America, Washington, DC 20064 (corresponding author). E-mail: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share