Technical Papers
Aug 17, 2015

Current Status of Interface Management in Construction: Drivers and Effects of Systematic Interface Management

Publication: Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Volume 142, Issue 2

Abstract

Interface management (IM) is an emerging construction management practice that industry finds necessary for megaprojects that have become more complex and global. Defined as the appropriate management of communications, relationships, and deliverables among stakeholders, effective IM is integral to project success. Yet, because it is an emerging discipline, IM implementation has varied widely across the industry. Furthermore, the effect of IM on project performance is still unclear. To address these gaps, the construction industry institute (CII) chartered a research team, to identify the current state of IM and to investigate the relationship between systematic IM and project performance. To accomplish this, the authors conducted structured interviews for 46 projects. The study results showed that IM practices are most often found in industrial projects, with dollar values of more than one billion. In addition, IM adoption is positively correlated with the project dollar value and number of interface stakeholders. In terms of performance, projects with systematic IM tend to have lower mean and less dispersed cost growth, compared with projects without systematic IM. These results contribute to an understanding of the potential benefits of IM and its appropriate application as it further develops and is used in practice.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank the Construction Industry Institute (CII) for funding this research. Furthermore, this research would not been possible without the outstanding and significant collaboration, effort, and input from the members of the CII research team 302, interface management.

References

Alarcón, L. F., and Mardones, D. A. (1998). “Improving the design-construction interface.” Proc., 6th Annual Meeting of the Int. Group for Lean Construction, Guaruja, Brazil.
Al-Hammad, A. M. (2000). “Common interface problems among various construction parties.” J. Perform. Constr. Facil., 71–74.
Ansar, A., Flyvbjerg, B., Budzier, A., and Lunn, D. (2014). “Should we build more large dams? The actual costs of hydropower megaproject development.” Energy Policy, 69, 43–56.
Bluman, A. G. (2008). Elementary statistics: A brief version, McGraw-Hill, New York.
Chen, Q. (2007). “An object model framework for interface management in building information models.” Ph.D. dissertation, Virginia Polytechnic Institute, State Univ., VA.
Chinowsky, P., Taylor, J. E., and Di Marco, M. (2010). “Project network interdependency alignment: New approach to assessing project effectiveness.” J. Manage. Eng., 170–178.
Chua, D. K. H., and Godinot, M. (2006). “Use of a WBS matrix to improve interface management in projects.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 67–79.
CII (Construction Industry Institute). (2002). “Measuring the impacts of the delivery system on project performance- design-build and design-bid-build.”, Univ. of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX.
CII (Construction Industry Institute). (2014). “Interface management implementation guide (IMIGe).”, Univ. of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX.
Collins, R., Durham, R., Fayek, R. and Zeid, W. (2010). “Interface management in complex projects.” Pet. Technol. Q., 15(2), 27–35.
Comu, S., Unsal, H. I., and Taylor, J. E. (2010). “Dual impact of cultural and linguistic diversity on project network performance.” J. Manage. Eng., 179–187.
Dave, B., and Koskela, L. (2009). “Collaborative knowledge management—A construction case study.” Autom. Constr., 18(7), 894–902.
Di Marco, M., and Taylor, J. E. (2010). “Knowledge system conflicts in global project networks.” Construction Research Congress 2010@ Innovation for Reshaping Construction Practice, ASCE, Reston, VA, 768–777.
Fellows, R., and Liu, A. M. M. (2012). “Managing organizational interfaces in engineering construction projects: Addressing fragmentation and boundary issues across multiple interfaces.” Constr. Manage. Econ., 30(8), 653–671.
Flyvbjerg, B. (2014). “What you should know about megaprojects and why: An overview.” Project Manage. J., 45(2), 6–19.
Ghanem, A. G., and AbdelRazig, Y. A. (2006). “A framework for real-time construction project progress tracking.” Earth Space, 188(112), 1–8.
Han, S. H., Kim, D. Y., and Kim, H. (2007). “Predicting profit performance for selecting candidate international construction projects.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 425–436.
Huang, R., Huang, C., Lin, H., and Ku, W. (2008). “Factor analysis of interface problems among construction parties—A case study of MRT.” J. Mar. Sci. Technol., 16(1), 52–63.
Hui, P. P., Davis-Blake, A., and Broschak, J. P. (2008). “Managing interdependence: The effects of outsourcing structure on the performance of complex projects.” Decis. Sci., 39(1), 5–31.
Jergeas, G. F., and Ruwanpura, J. (2009). “Why cost and schedule overruns on mega oil sands projects?” Pract. Period. Struct. Des. Constr., 40–43.
Kardes, I., Ozturk, A., Cavusgil, S. T., and Cavusgil, E. (2013). “Managing global megaprojects: Complexity and risk management.” Int. Bus. Rev., 22(6), 905–917.
Lin, Y. C. (2009). “Developing construction network-based interface management system.” Building Sustainable Future—Proc., 2009 Construction Research Congress, ASCE, Reston, VA, 477–486.
Lin, Y. C. (2012). “Construction network-based interface management system.” Autom. Constr., 30, 228–241.
Locatelli, G., Mancini, M., Gastaldo, G., and Mazza, F. (2013). “Improving projects performance with lean construction: State of the art, applicability and impacts.” Organiz. Technol. Manage. Constr.: Int. J., 5(2013), 775–783.
Lomax, R. G., and Hahs-Vaughn, D. L. (2007). An introduction to statistical concepts, 3rd Ed., Routledge, New Jersey.
Maylor, H. (2003). Project management, 3rd Ed., FT Prentice Hall, Harlow, England.
Mikkola, J. H., and Gassmann, O. (2001). “Modularity and interface management.” Proc., IAMOT 2001 Conf., Lausanne, Switzerland, 19–22.
Morris, P. W. G. (1983). “Managing project interfaces - key points for project success.” Project management handbook, D. Cleland and W. King, eds., 16–55.
Nikander, I. O., and Eloranta, E. (2001). “Project management by early warnings.” Int. J. Project Manage., 19(7), 385–399.
Nitithamyong, P., and Skibniewski, M. J. (2004). “Web-based construction project management systems: How to make them successful?” Autom. Constr., 13(4), 491–506.
Nooteboom, U. (2004). “Interface, management improves on-time, on-budget delivery of megaprojects.” J. Pet. Technol., 56(8), 32–34.
Pavitt, T. C., and Gibb, A. G. F. (2003). “Interface management within construction: In particular, building facade.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 8–15.
Prieto, B. (2015). “Is it time to rethink project management theory?” PM World J., IV(III), 1–5.
Reichelt, K., and Lyneis, J. (1999). “The dynamics of project performance: Benchmarking the drivers of cost and schedule overrun.” Eur. Manage. J., 17(2), 135–150.
Senthilkumar, V., Varghese, K., and Chandran, A. (2010). “A web-based system for design interface management of construction projects.” Autom. Constr., 19(2), 197–212.
Shirley, R. R., and James, H. (2006). “Complex projects need coordination.” Hart’s E and P, 79(10), 83–85.
Shokri, S., Safa, M., Haas, C. T., and Haas, R. C. G. (2011). “A conceptual framework to improve information and process management in the execution of capital projects.” Proc., 3rd Int./9th Construction Specialty Conf., Canadian Society of Civil Engineering, 14–17.
Shokri, S., Safa, M., Haas, C. T., Haas, R. C. G., Maloney, K., and Mac-Gillivray, S. (2012). “Interface management model for mega capital projects.” Proc., Construction Research Congress, ASCE, Reston, VA, 447–456.
Siao, F. C, and Lin, Y. C. (2012). “Enhancing construction interface management using multilevel interface matrix approach.” J. Civ. Eng. Manage., 18(1), 133–144.
Ulrich, K. (1995). “The role of product architecture in the manufacturing firm.” Res. Policy, 24(3), 419–440.
Vidal, L. A., and Marle, F. (2008). “Understanding project complexity: Implications on project management.” Kybernetes, 37(8), 1094–1110.
Weshah, N., El-Ghandour, W. W., Jergeas, G., and Cowe-Falls, L. (2013). “Factor analysis of the interface management (IM) problems for construction projects in Alberta.” Can. J. Civ. Eng., 40(9), 848–860.
Wong, A. K., and Zhang, R. (2013). “Implementation of web-based construction project management system in China projects by Hong Kong developers.” Constr. Innovation: Inform. Process Manage., 13(1), 26–49.
Wren, D. A. (1967). “Interface and interorganizational coordination.” Acad. Manage. J., 10(1), 69–81.
Yun, S., Mulva, S. P., and O’Brien, W. J. (2012). “A quantitative approach for measuring managerial interfaces in the development of a capital project.” Proc., Construction Research Congress, ASCE, Reston, VA, 1410–1419.
Zhiliang, M., Heng, L., Shen, Q. P., and Jun, Y. (2004). “Using XML to support information exchange in construction projects.” Autom. Constr., 13(5), 629–637.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Volume 142Issue 2February 2016

History

Received: Dec 9, 2014
Accepted: May 28, 2015
Published online: Aug 17, 2015
Discussion open until: Jan 17, 2016
Published in print: Feb 1, 2016

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Postdoctoral Fellow, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of Waterloo, 200 University Ave. West, Waterloo, ON, Canada N2L 3G1 (corresponding author). E-mail: [email protected]
S. Ahn, A.M.ASCE [email protected]
Postdoctoral Fellow, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of Alberta, 9105 116th ST, 5-051 NREF, Edmonton, AB, Canada T6G 2W2. E-mail: [email protected]
S. Lee, M.ASCE [email protected]
Associate Professor, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of Michigan, 2340 GG Brown, 2350 Hayward St., Ann Arbor, MI 48109. E-mail: [email protected]
C. T. Haas, F.ASCE [email protected]
Professor, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of Waterloo, 200 University Ave. West, Waterloo, ON, Canada N2L 3G1. E-mail: [email protected]
R. C. G. Haas, F.ASCE [email protected]
Professor, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of Waterloo, 200 University Ave. West, Waterloo, ON, Canada N2L 3G1. E-mail: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share