Empirical Investigation of the Average Deployment Force of Personal Fall-Arrest Energy Absorbers
Publication: Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Volume 141, Issue 1
Abstract
The personal energy absorber (PEA) is a critical component of a personal fall arrest system (PFAS), and it is meant to dissipate the energy generated during a fall to prevent injuries to the user. When designing PFASs, engineers need to estimate the fall distance of the user, and one of the parameters needed is the average deployment force () of a PEA. However, currently there is a lack of empirical information on . The guidance for the estimation of stipulated in the North American standards Z259.16 and Z359.6 did not provide supporting empirical data and appeared to be focused on lower-capacity PEAs (class E4 or Type 1) that are not common in regions like Australia, New Zealand, Europe, and Singapore. Thus, this study aims to provide empirical data for the estimation of of higher-capacity PEAs (class E6 or Type 2) represented by AS/NZS 1891.1:2007 PEAs. Thirty-one force–time charts of drop tests conducted on AS/NZS 1891.1-certified PEAs were evaluated, and it was found that the ranged from 3.2 to 4.7 kN with a mean of 3.9 kN. In contrast to the guidance in Z259.16 and Z359.6, the data does not support estimating based on 80% of maximum arrest force. The study also provided empirical basis for approximating using energy-balance calculation. This paper recommends that in the absence of manufacturer’s information on and other test data, a reasonable estimate of of PEA certified to AS/NZS 1891.1:2007 is 3.4 kN (10th percentile) and a conservative estimate is 3.2 kN (minimum). In the absence of publicly available empirical data of PEA certified to other standards, the results in this paper can provide useful guidance for estimation of certified to other similar standards.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
Acknowledgments
This study would not have been possible without the in-kind support from Capital Safety, WorkSafe Gear, and Mr. Hoe Yee Pin. The author would like to thank the assistance provided by Michael Biddle, Rick Millar, and Wayne Loft from Capital Safety, Mark Haney and Graham Genge from WorkSafe Gear. The author also acknowledges the assistance provided by Teck Poh Teng in this study. Last, Greg Small of High Engineering Corp. provided critical and valuable inputs for the paper, including useful suggestions for further research.
References
ANSI/ASSE. (2009). Z359.6-2009 specifications and design requirements for active fall protection systems, Springfield, IL.
ANSI/ASSE. (2013). ANSI/ASSE Z359.13-2013 personal energy absorbers and energy absorbing lanyards, Springfield, IL.
Beavers, J. E., Moore, J. R., and Schriver, W. R. (2009). “Steel erection fatalities in the construction industry.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 227–234.
Behm, M. (2005). “Linking construction fatalities to the design for construction safety concept.” Saf. Sci., 43(8), 589–611.
British Standards Institution. (2002). BS EN 355:2002—Personal protective equipment against falls from a height—Energy absorbers, London.
Canadian Standards Association. (2005). Z259.11-05 energy absorbers and lanyards, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Canadian Standards Association. (2009). Z259.16-04 (R2009) design of active fall-protection systems, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Goh, Y. M., and Love, P. E. D. (2010). “Adequacy of personal fall arrest energy absorbers in relation to heavy workers.” Saf. Sci., 48(6), 747–754.
Hoła, B. (2010). “Methodology of hazards identification in construction work course.” J. Civ. Eng. Manage., 16(4), 577–585.
International Organization for Standardization. (2000). ISO 10333-2:2000 personal fall-arrest systems—Part 2: Lanyards and energy absorbers, Geneva.
Miura, M., and Sulowski, A. C. (1991). “Introduction to horizontal lifelines.” Fundamentals of fall protection, International Society for Fall Protection, Toronto, ON, Canada, 217–283.
Sa, J., Seo, D.-C., and Choi, S. D. (2009). “Comparison of risk factors for falls from height between commercial and residential roofers.” J. Saf. Res., 40(1), 1–6.
Small, G. (2011). “Calculating clearance—Know your fall protection’s capabilities.” 〈http://www.ishn.com/articles/print/91975-calculating-clearance〉 (Nov. 21, 2013).
Society of Automotive Engineers. (1988). Instrumentation for impact tests, Warrendale, PA.
Spring Singapore. (2006). SS 528: Part 2: 2006 specification for personal fall-arrest systems—Part 2: Lanyards and energy absorbers, Singapore.
Standards Australia/Standards New Zealand. (2007). “As/nzs 1891.1 industrial fall-arrest systems and devices—Part 1: Harnesses and ancillary equipment.” Standards Australia Online, Sydney, Australia.
Wu, J. Z., Powers, J. R., Harris, J. R., and Pan, C. S. (2011). “Estimation of the kinetic energy dissipation in fall-arrest system and manikin during fall impact.” Ergonomics, 54(4), 367–379.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
© 2014 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: Jan 6, 2014
Accepted: Jun 12, 2014
Published online: Jul 22, 2014
Discussion open until: Dec 22, 2014
Published in print: Jan 1, 2015
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.