Technical Papers
Mar 6, 2014

Condition Prediction Models for Oil and Gas Pipelines Using Regression Analysis

Publication: Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Volume 140, Issue 6

Abstract

Although they are the safest means of transporting oil and gas products, pipelines can sometimes fail with hazardous consequences and large business losses. The decision to replace, repair, or rehabilitate depends mainly on the condition of the pipeline. Assessing and predicting its condition is therefore a key step in the maintenance plan of a pipeline. Several models have recently been developed to predict pipeline failures and conditions. However, most of these models were limited to the use of corrosion as the sole factor to assess the condition of pipelines. The objective of this paper is to develop models that assess and predict the condition of oil and gas pipelines based on several factors including corrosion. The regression analysis technique was used to develop the condition prediction models based on historical inspection data of three existing pipelines in Qatar. In addition, a condition assessment scale for pipelines was built based on expert opinion. The models were able to satisfactorily predict pipeline condition with an average percent validity above 96% when applied to the validation data set. The models are expected to help decision makers assess and predict the condition of existing oil and gas pipelines and hence prioritize their inspection and rehabilitation planning.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Acknowledgments

The authors gratefully acknowledge the support provided by Qatar National Research Fund (QNRF) for this research project under award No. QNRF-NPRP 09-901-2-343. The authors would also like to acknowledge the operational pipeline engineers of Qatar Petroleum for their invaluable suggestions and recommendations.

References

Ahammed, M. (1998). “Probabilistic estimation of remaining life of a pipeline in the presence of active corrosion defects.” Int. J. Pressure Vessels Piping, 75(4), 321–329.
Ahammed, M., and Melchers, R. E. (1996). “Reliability estimation of pressurized pipelines subject to localized corrosion defects.” Int. J. Pressure Vessels Piping, 69(3), 267–272.
Al-Barqawi, H., and Zayed, T. (2006). “Condition rating model for underground infrastructure sustainable water mains.” J. Perform. Constr. Facil., 126–135.
Bersani, C., Citro, L., Gagliardi, R. V., Sacile, R., and Tomasoni, A. M. (2010). “Accident occurrance evaluation in the pipeline transport dangerous goods.” Chem. Eng. Trans., 19, 249–254.
Davis, P. M., Dubois, J., Gambardella, F., and Uhlig, F. (2010). “Performance of European cross-country oil pipelines: Statistical summary of reported spillages in 2008 and since 1971.” CONCAWE, Brussels, Belgium.
Dawotola, A. W., VanGelder, P. H. A. J. M., and Vrijling, J. K. (2009). “Risk assessment of petroleum pipelines using a combined analytical hierarchy process: Fault tree analysis (AHP-FTA).” Proc., 7th Int. Probabilistic Workshop, Dirk Proske, Delft, The Netherlands.
Dey, P. K. (2001). “A risk-based model for inspection and maintenance of cross-country petroleum pipelines.” J. Qual. Maint. Eng., 7(1), 25–43.
Dikmen, I., Birgonul, M., and Kiziltas, S. (2005). “Prediction of organizational effectiveness in construction companies.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 252–261.
El-Abbasy, M. S., Senouci, A., Zayed, T., and Mosleh, F. (2014). “A condition assessment model for oil and gas pipelines using integrated simulation and analytic network process.” J. Struct. Infrastruct. Eng., in press.
Hallen, J. M., Caleyo, F., and Gonzalez, J. L. (2003). “Probabilistic condition assessment of corroding pipelines in Mexico.” Proc., 3rd Pan American Conf. for Nondestructive Testing (PANNDT), Curran Associates, Red Hook, NY.
Levine, D., Stephanm, D., Krehbiel, T., Berenson, M., and Bliss, J. (2002). Statistics for managers: Using Microsoft Excel, 3rd Ed., Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ.
Li, S. X., Yu, S. R., Zeng, H. L., Li, J. H., and Liang, R. (2009). “Predicting corrosion remaining life of underground pipelines with a mechanically based probabilistic model.” J. Pet. Sci. Eng., 65(3–4), 162–166.
Minitab 16.1 [Computer software]. Minitab Inc., State College, PA.
Neter, J., Kutner, M., Nachtsheim, C., and Wasserman, W. (1996). Applied linear regression models, 3rd Ed., McGraw-Hill, New York.
Netto, T. A., Ferraz, U. S., and Estefen, S. F. (2005). “The effect of corrosion defects on the burst pressure of pipelines.” J. Constr. Steel Res., 61(8), 1185–1204.
Noor, N. M., Ozman, N. A. N., and Yahaya, N. (2011). “Deterministic prediction of corroding pipeline remaining strength in marine environment using DNV RP-F101 (Part A).” J. Sustain. Sci. Manage., 6(1), 69–78.
Noor, N. M., Yahaya, N., Ozman, N. A. N., and Othman, S. R. (2010). “The forecasting residual life of corroding pipeline based on semi-probabilistic method.” J. Civ. Eng., 1(2), 246–263.
Peng, X. Y., Zhang, P., and Chen, L. Q. (2009). “Long-distance oil/gas pipeline failure rate prediction based on fuzzy neural network model.” CSIE 2009 Proc., World Congress on Computer Science and Information Engineering, Vol. 5, IEEE Computer Society, Washington, DC.
Senouci, A., El-Abbasy, M. S., Elwakil, E., Abdrabou, B., and Zayed, T. (2014a). “A model for predicting failure of oil pipelines.” J. Struct. Infrastruct. Eng., 10(3), 375–387.
Senouci, A., El-Abbasy, M. S., and Zayed, T. (2014b). “A fuzzy-based model for predicting failure of oil pipelines.” J. Infrastruct. Syst.
Singh, M., and Markeset, T. (2009). “A methodology for risk-based inspection planning of oil and gas pipes based on fuzzy logic framework.” Eng. Failure Anal., 16(7), 2098–2113.
Sinha, S. K., and Pandey, M. D. (2002). “Probabilistic neural network for reliability assessment of oil and gas pipelines.” Comput. Aided Civ. Infrastruct. Eng., 17(5), 320–329.
Teixeira, A. P., GuedesSoares, C., Netto, T. A., and Estefen, S. F. (2008). “Reliability of pipelines with corrosion defects.” Int. J. Pressure Vessels Piping, 85(4), 228–237.
Wilson, P., Wheeler, D., Wilson, R., Coleman, R., and Wolfe, N. (1997). “An assessment of low pressure crude oil pipelines and crude oil gathering lines in California.” CSFM, Sacramento, CA.
Zayed, T., and Halpin, D. (2005). “Deterministic models for assessing production and cost of bored piles.” Constr. Manage. Econ., 23(5), 531–543.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Volume 140Issue 6June 2014

History

Received: Aug 2, 2013
Accepted: Dec 31, 2013
Published online: Mar 6, 2014
Published in print: Jun 1, 2014
Discussion open until: Aug 6, 2014

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Mohammed S. El-Abbasy [email protected]
Ph.D. Candidate, Dept. of Building, Civil and Environmental Engineering, Concordia Univ., Montreal, QC, Canada H3G 1M8 (corresponding author). E-mail: [email protected]
Ahmed Senouci [email protected]
Associate Professor, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Qatar Univ., P.O. Box 2713, Doha, Qatar. E-mail: [email protected]
Tarek Zayed [email protected]
M.ASCE
Professor, Dept. of Building, Civil and Environmental Engineering, Concordia Univ., Montreal, QC, Canada H3G 1M8. E-mail: [email protected]
Farid Mirahadi [email protected]
Graduate Student, Dept. of Building, Civil and Environmental Engineering, Concordia Univ., Montreal, QC, Canada H3G 1M8. E-mail: [email protected]
Laya Parvizsedghy [email protected]
Ph.D. Candidate, Dept. of Building, Civil and Environmental Engineering, Concordia Univ., Montreal, QC, Canada H3G 1M8. E-mail: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share