Focus Group Study to Explore Critical Factors of Public Engagement Process for Mega Development Projects
Publication: Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Volume 140, Issue 3
Abstract
Due to the dynamic nature of construction projects, multiple stakeholders with various expectations are often involved. To achieve consensus among different stakeholders, public engagement (PE) is increasingly adopted for mega development projects. However, it is really difficult to satisfy various stakeholder needs if PE is inappropriately conducted. PE has been criticized for its illogical and unsystematic processes underlying decisions. Hence, the current study aimed to explore and identify critical factors of the PE process in order to improve final performance. To achieve this aim, four focus groups were held involving different types of stakeholders (e.g., governmental departments, construction professionals, interest groups, and local residents). PE process factors, addressed in the focus groups, fell into two main categories: logical decision-making process and team behaviors, with the latter divided into task and personal dimensions. The results of the current study were used as the first stage of a comprehensive study aimed at improving PE performance. Several practical recommendations for facilitating the PE process were also pointed out in the group discussion, such as the application of logical and systematic decision-making processes, the establishment of effective evaluation methods and frameworks for evaluation criteria, and the usage of transparent and equal discussion rules.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
Acknowledgments
The work described in this paper was fully supported by a grant from the Hong Kong Institute of Surveyors (Planning and Development Division, Project No.: NP022075-02).
References
Adams, G. R., and Schvaneveldt, J. D. (1985). Understanding research methods, Longman, New York.
Albrechts, L. (2004). “Strategic (spatial) planning reexamined.” Environ. Plann. B, 31(5), 743–758.
Albrechts, L. (2006). “Bridge the gap: From spatial planning to strategic projects.” Eur. Plann. Studies, 14(10), 1484–1500.
Altshuler, A. A., and Luberoff, D. (2003). Mega-projects: The changing politics of urban public investment, Brookings Institution, Washington, DC.
Birks, M., and Mills, J. (2011). Grounded theory: A practical guide, Sage Publications, London.
Broad, K., Pfaff, A., Taddei, R., Sankarasubramanian, A., Lall, U., and de Assis de Souza Filho, F. (2007). “Clemate, stream flow prediction and water management in northest Brazil: Societal trends and forecast value.” Clim. Change, 84(2), 217–239.
Bryson, J. M. (2004). “What to do when stakeholders matter: Stakeholder identification and analysis techniques.” Publ. Manage. Rev., 6(1), 21–53.
Bunker, B. B., and Alban, B. T. (1997). Large group interventions: Engaging the whole system for rapid change, Jossey-Bass, San Francisco.
Carron, A. V., et al. (2004). “Using consensus as a criterion for groupness: Implications for the cohesion-group success relationship.” Small Group Res., 35(4), 466–491.
Charmaz, K. (1990). “‘Discovering’ chronic illness: Using grounded theory.” Soc. Sci. Med., 30(11), 1161–1172.
Coleman, S., and Gotze, J. (2001). Bowling together: Online public engagement in policy deliberation, Hansard Society, London.
Cooper, D. R., and Schindler, P. S. (2006). Business research methods, McGraw-Hill/Irwin, New York.
Corbin, J., and Strauss, A. (1990). “Grounded theory research: Procedures, canons, and evaluative criteria.” Qual. Sociol., 13(1), 3–21.
De Cremer, D., Tyler, T., and Ouden, N. (2005). “Managing cooperation via procedural fairness: The mediating influence of self-other merging.” J. Econ. Psychol., 26(3), 393–406.
Doelle, M., and Sinclair, A. J. (2006). “Time for a new approach to public participation in EA: Promoting cooperation and consensus for sustainability.” Environ. Impact Assess. Rev., 26(2), 185–205.
Einhorn, H. J., and Hogarth, R. M. (1981). “Behavioral decision theory: processes of judgment and choice.” J. Account. Res., 19(1), 1–31.
Ellis, L. M., and Chen, E. C. (2013). “Negotiating identity development among undocumented immigrant college students: A grounded theory study.” J. Counsel. Psychol., 60(2), 251–264.
Elton Consulting. (2003). Community engagement in the NSW planning system, Dept. of Planning, Sydney, Australia.
Fielding, K. S., McDonald, R., and Louis, W. R. (2008). “Theory of planned behavior, identity and intentions to engage in environmental activism.” J. Environ. Psychol., 28(4), 318–326.
Freeman, R. E. (1994). “The politics of stakeholder theory: Some future directions.” Bus. Ethics Q., 4(4), 409–421.
Gamble, J. (2010). Evaluating vibrant communities, Tamarack, Canada.
Garmendia, E., and Stagl, S. (2010). “Public participation for sustainability and social learning: Concepts and lessons from three case studies in Europe.” Ecol. Econ., 69(8), 1712–1722.
Glaser, B. (1978). Theoretical sensitivity, Sociology Press, Mill Valley, CA.
Glaser, B., and Strauss, A. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research, Aldine de Gruyter, Chicago.
Graaf, R. S., and Dewulf, G. (2010). “Applying the lessons of strategic urban planning learned in the developing world to the Netherlands: A case study of three industrial area development projects.” Habitat Int., 34(4), 471–477.
Gregory, R. (2000). “Using stakeholder values to make smarter environmental decisions.” Environment, 42(5), 34–44.
Heylen, M., and Chappell, B. (2008). Community engagement handbook: A model framework for leading practice in local government in South Australia, Local Government Association, Adelaide, Australia.
Hughes, D., and DuMont, K. (1993). “Using focus groups to facilitate culturally anchored research.” Am. J. Community Psychol., 21(6), 775–805.
Hurd, T. L., and McIntyre, A. (1996). “The seduction of sameness: similarity and representing the other.” Representing the other, S. Wilkinson and C. Kitzinger, eds., Sage, London, 78–82.
Innes, J. E., and Booher, D. E. (1999). “Consensus building and complex adaptive systems: A framework for evaluating collaborative planning.” APA J., 65(4), 412–423.
Irvin, R. A., and Stansbury, J. (2004). “Citizen participation in decision making: Is it worth the effort?” Publ. Admin. Rev., 64(1), 55–65.
Johnson, G., and Scholes, K. (1999). Exploring corporate strategy: Text and cases, Prentice Hall Europe, London.
King, C. S., Feltey, K. M., and Susel, B. O. (1998). “The question of participation: toward authentic public participation in public administration.” Publ. Admin. Rev., 58(4), 317–326.
Krueger, R. A., and Casey, M. A. (2009). Focus groups: A practical guide for applied research, Sage, Los Angeles.
Leung, M. Y. (2001). Value management in construction projects, Univ. of Hong Kong, Hong Kong.
Leung, M. Y., and Chan, I. Y. S. (2012). “Exploring stressors of Hong Kong expatriate construction professionals in Mainland China: Focus group study.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 78–88.
Leung, M. Y., and Liu, A. M. M. (2003). “Analysis of value and project goal specificity in value management.” Constr. Manage. Econ., 21(1), 11–19.
Leung, M. Y., Liu, A. M. M., and Ng, S. T. (2005). “Is there a relationship between construction conflicts and participants satisfaction.” Eng. Construct. Architect. Manage., 12(2), 149–167.
Leung, M. Y., Ng, S. T., and Cheung, S. (2002). “Improving satisfaction through conflict stimulation and resolution in value management in construction projects.” J. Manage. Eng., 68–74.
Leung, M. Y., Ng, S. T., and Cheung, S. (2004). “Measuring construction project participant satisfaction.” Constr. Manage. Econ., 22(3), 319–331.
Leung, M. Y., and Olomolaiye, P. (2010). “Risk and construction stakeholders.” Construction stakeholder management, E. Chinyio, ed., Blackwell Publishing, Chichester, U.K., 75–98.
Leung, M. Y., and Yu, J. (2012). “A comparison of the decision-making processes involved in public engagement practices and value management practices in Hong Kong.” Proc., Int. Value Management Conf. 2012, Polytechnic Univ. of Hong Kong, Hong Kong.
Leung, M. Y., Yu, J. Y., Wang, L., and Zhou, W. T. (2012). Improvement of public engagement performance for planning and development projects via a value management approach, Hong Kong Institute of Surveyors (Planning and Development Division) and City Univ. of Hong Kong, Hong Kong.
Liu, A. M. M., and Leung, M. Y. (2002). “Developing a soft value management model.” Int. J. Project Manage., 20(5), 341–349.
Mannarini, T., Fedi, A., and Trippetti, S. (2010). “Public involvement: How to encourage citizen participation.” J. Community Appl. Soc. Psychol., 20(4), 262–274.
Marquart-Pyatt, S. T., and Petrzelka, P. (2008). “Trust, the democratic process, and involvement in a rural community.” Rural Sociol., 73(2), 250–274.
Mayer, I., Edelenbos, J., and Monnikhof, R. (2005). “Interactive policy development: undermining or sustaining democracy?” Public Admin., 83(1), 179–199.
Merton, R. K., and Kendall, P. L. (1946). Focus groups: A practical guide for applied research, Sage, Newbury Park, CA.
Morgan, D., Krueger, R. A., Scannell, A. U., and King, J. A. (1998). Focus group kit, SAGE, Thousand Oaks, CA.
Moura, H. M., and Teixeira, J. C. (2010). “Managing stakeholders conflicts.” Construction stakeholder management, E. Chinyio, ed., Blackwell Publishing, Chichester, U.K., 286–316.
Newcombe, R. (2003). “From client to project stakeholders: A stakeholder mapping approach.” Constr. Manage. Econ., 21(8), 841–848.
Olander, S. (2007). “Stakeholder impact analysis in construction project management.” Constr. Manage. Econ., 25(3), 277–287.
Pahl-Wostl, C., and Hare, M. (2004). “Process of social learning in integrated resources management.” J. Community Appl. Soc. Psychol., 14(3), 193–206.
Petts, J. (1999). “Public participation and environmental impact assessment.” Handbook of environmental impact assessment, J. Petts, ed., Blackwell Science, Oxford, U.K., 145–177.
Pomeroy, R., and Douvere, F. (2008). “The engagement of stakeholders in the marine spatial planning process.” Mar. Pol., 32(5), 816–822.
Reed, M. S. (2008). “Stakeholder participation for environmental management: A literature review.” Biol. Conserv., 141(10), 2417–2431.
Renn, O., Webler, T., Rakel, H., Dienel, P., and Johnson, B. (1993) “Public participation in decision making: A three-step procedure.” Policy Sci., 26(3), 189–214.
Roberts, N. (2004). “Public deliberation in an age of direct citizen participation.” Am. Rev. Public Admin., 34(4), 315–353.
Rogers, J. C., Simmons, E. A., Convery, I., and Weatherall, A. (2008). “Public perception of opportunities for community-based renewable energy projects.” Energy Policy, 36(11), 4217–4226.
Rowe, G., and Frewer, L. J. (2005). “A typology of public engagement mechanisms.” Sci. Technol. Human Values, 30(2), 251–290.
SAVE International. (2007). “Value standard and body of knowledge.” 〈http://www.value-eng.org/about_vmstandard.php〉 (Sep. 25, 2012).
Sewell, W. R. D., and Coppock, J. T. (1988). “A perspective on public participation in planning.” Public participation in planning, W. R. D. Sewell and J. T. Coppock, eds., Wiley, London.
Smithson, J. (2000). “Using and analyzing focus groups: Limitations and possibilities.” Int. J. Soc. Res. Meth., 3(2), 103–119.
Taylor, J. E., Dossick, C. S. D., and Garvin, M. (2011). “Meeting the burden of proof with case-study research.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 303–311.
Thomas, J. C. (1995). Public participation in public decisions: New skills and strategies for public managers, Jossey-Bass, San Francisco.
Thompson, M. N., Cole, O. D., and Nitzarim, R. S. (2012). “Recognizing social class in psychotherapy relationship: A grounded theory exploration of low-income clients.” J. Counsel. Psychol., 59(2), 208–221.
Timlin-Scalera, R. M., Ponterotto, J. G., Blumberg, F. C., and Jackson, M. A. (2003). “A grounded theory study of help-seeking behaviors among white male high school students.” J. Counsel. Psychol., 50(3), 339–350.
Tracy, S. J., Lutgen-Sandvik, P., and Alberts, J. K. (2006). “Nightmares, demons, and slaves: Exploring the plainful metaphors of workplace bullying.” Manage. Commun. Q., 20(2), 148–185.
Tyler, T., and Blader, S. (2003). “The group engagement model: Procedural justice, social identity, and cooperative behavior.” Pers. Soc. Psychol. Rev., 7(4), 349–361.
Vaughn, S., Shay, S., and Sinagub, J. (1996). Focus group interviews in education and psychology, Sage, Newbury Park, CA.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Volume 140 • Issue 3 • March 2014
Copyright
© 2013 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: Mar 25, 2013
Accepted: Oct 28, 2013
Published online: Dec 12, 2013
Published in print: Mar 1, 2014
Discussion open until: May 12, 2014
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.