Technical Papers
Sep 10, 2012

Adaptive Learning of Contractor Default Prediction Model for Surety Bonding

Publication: Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Volume 139, Issue 6

Abstract

The performance of a fuzzy expert system (FES) is significantly affected by the accuracy of its knowledge base parameters (membership functions and rule bases). The main contribution of this paper is in presenting a methodology to integrate an FES with adaptation/optimization techniques and applying the data-based adaptive learning concept to increase the accuracy of an FES developed for contractor default prediction for surety bonding. In addition, this paper investigates two optimization approaches (genetic algorithms and neural network back-propagation) for adaptation of fuzzy membership function (MBF) and rules’ degree of support (DoS) to determine the most suitable technique to adapt the FES. The optimized FES, called SuretyQualification, was validated using 30 hypothetical contractor default prediction cases, and the highest accuracy of the system (adapted using neural networks) was found to be 91.83%. Another contribution of this paper is the development of a software tool called SuretyQualification that provides a comprehensive and systematic evaluation process to evaluate a contractor and their risk of default on a project. The presented optimization approaches address FES context adaptation using any changing information conveyed by the input-output data and provide a methodology for continuous adaptation of the FES parameters, using practical cases to adjust the FES according to any contexts changes.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to express their appreciation to all the surety industry professionals who participated in this research for their time, knowledge, and expertise in providing input to the research. This research was funded by an NSERC Discovery Grant held by Aminah Robinson Fayek.

References

Abraham, A. (2005). “Adaptation of fuzzy inference system using neural learning.” Chapter 3, Fuzzy system engineering: Theory and practice, studies in fuzziness and soft computing, Springer, Heidelberg, Germany, 53–83.
Al-Sobiei, O. S., Arditi, D., and Polat, G. (2005). “Managing owner’s risk of contractor default.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 131(9), 973–978.
Arslan, A., and Kaya, M. (2001). “Determination of fuzzy logic membership functions using genetic algorithms.” Fuzzy Sets Syst., 118(2), 297–306.
Arun, K., Shakti, K., and Kumar, R. G. (2007). “A comparison of computational efforts between particle swarm optimization and genetic algorithm for identification of fuzzy models.” Proc., NAFIPS ’07, Annual Meeting of the North American Fuzzy Information Processing Society, IEEE, New York, 245–250.
Awad, A., and Fayek, A. R. (2011). “Adaptive learning for fuzzy expert systems for construction applications.” CSCE Annual General Conf., Canadian Society for Civil Engineering, Quebec, Canada.
Awad, A., and Fayek, A. R. (2012). “Contractor default prediction model for surety bonding.” Can. J. Civ. Eng., 39(9), 1027–1042.
Bayraktar, M. E., and Hastak, M. (2010). “Scoring approach to construction bond underwriting.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 136(9), 957–967.
Boussabaine, A. H. (2001). “Neurofuzzy modeling of construction projects duration II: Application.” Eng. Construct. Architect. Manag., 8(2), 114–129.
Cordon, O., Gomide, F., Herrera, F., Hoffmann, F., and Magdalena, L. (2004). “Ten years of genetic fuzzy systems: Current framework and new trends.” Fuzzy Sets Syst., 141(1), 5–31.
Inform GmbH. (2005). FuzzyTECH 5.5 user’s manual, Inform GmbH/Inform Software Corp., Aachen, Germany.
Jarmo, T. A. (2006). “Genetic algorithms: An introduction.” Introductory Lecture for the Ninth Scandinavian Conf. on Artificial Intelligence Genetic Algorithms Session, 〈ftp://ftp.uwasa.fi/cs/report96-1/SCAI06printer.pdf〉 (Mar. 3, 2011).
Kangrang, A., and Chaleeraktrakoon, C. (2007). “A fuzzy-GAs model for determining varied irrigation efficiency.” Am. J. Appl. Sci., 4(6), 339–345.
Kasabov, N. K., Kim, J. S., Gray, A. R., and Watts, M. J. (1997). “FuNN—A fuzzy neural network architecture for adaptive learning and knowledge acquisition.” Technical Rep., Dept. of Information Science, Univ. of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand.
Lam, K. C., Lam, M. C., and Wang, D. (2010). “Efficacy of using support vector machine in a contractor prequalification decision model.” J. Comput. Civ. Eng., 24(3), 273–280.
Lam, K. C., Palaneeswaran, E., and Yu, C. Y. (2009). “A support vector machine model for contractor prequalification.” Autom. Constr., 18(3), 321–329.
Lam, K. C., and Yu, C. Y. (2011). “A multiple kernel learning-based decision support model for contractor pre-qualification.” J. Autom. Constr., 20(5), 531–536.
Marsh, K., and Fayek, A. R. (2010). “SuretyAssist: A fuzzy expert system to assist surety underwriters in evaluating construction contractors for bonding.” J. Constr. Eng. Manag., 136(11), 1219–1226.
Masoud, M., Otman, B., and Mohamed, K. (2003). “Generation of fuzzy membership function using information theory measures and genetic algorithm.” Fuzzy Sets Syst., 2715, 603–610.
Munakata, T. (2008). Fundamentals of the new artificial intelligence; neural, evolutionary, fuzzy and more, 2nd Ed., Springer-Verlag London Limited, Cleveland.
Palade, V., Bumbaru, S., and Negoita, M. G. (1998). “A method for compiling neural networks into fuzzy rules using genetic algorithms and hierarchical approach.” Proc., 2nd IEEE Int. Conf. on Knowledge-Based Intelligent Electronic Systems- KES1998, Vol. 2, IEEE, New York, 353–358.
Pedrycz, W., Gudwin, R. R., and Gomide, F. A. C. (1997). “Nonlinear context adaptation in the calibration of fuzzy sets.” Fuzzy Sets Syst., 88(1), 91–97.
Plebankiewicz, E. (2009). “Contractor prequalification model using fuzzy sets.” J. Civ. Eng. Manage., 15(4), 377–385.
Ross, T. J. (2004). Fuzzy logic with engineering applications, 2nd Ed., Wiley, New York.
Von Altrock, C. (1997). Fuzzy logic and neurofuzzy applications in business and finance, Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Volume 139Issue 6June 2013
Pages: 694 - 704

History

Received: Feb 20, 2012
Accepted: Sep 7, 2012
Published online: Sep 10, 2012
Published in print: Jun 1, 2013

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Postdoctoral Fellow, Hole School of Construction Engineering, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, 1-050 Markin/CNRL Natural Resources Engineering Facility, Univ. of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada T6G 2W2. E-mail: [email protected]
Aminah Robinson Fayek [email protected]
M.ASCE
Professor, NSERC Industrial Research Chair in Strategic Construction Modeling and Delivery, Ledcor Professor in Construction Engineering, Hole School of Construction Engineering, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, 3-013 Markin/CNRL Natural Resources Engineering Facility, Univ. of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada T6G 2W2 (corresponding author). E-mail: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share