Technical Papers
Aug 31, 2012

Pricing Strategy for Best Value Tender

Publication: Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Volume 139, Issue 6

Abstract

Unlike the traditional price-focused lowest bid (LB), the best value (BV) tendering process selects the contractor that offers a product or service that is most beneficial to the procurement entity in various aspects. Existing pricing models, including cost-based probabilistic models and market-based neoclassical microeconomic theory, were developed for LB. Very few operational models exist for BV tenders due to the difficulty of measuring the price differences with respect to the variance of product or service quality. This paper proposes a price elasticity of quality (PEQ) model that provides useful tools to measure the PEQ of a product or service offered by contractors in a tendering process. Based on the proposed model, a bidding zone is suggested for the contractor in light of competitiveness and profitability. Two working examples are used to show the applicability of the proposed method.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

References

Abdelrahman, M., Zayed, T., and Elyamany, A. (2008). “Best-value model based on project specific characteristics.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 134(3), 179–188.
Akintoye, A., Hardcastle, C., Beck, M., Chinyio, E., and Asenova, D. (2003). “Achieving best value in private finance initiative project procurement.” Constr. Manage. Econ., 21(5), 461–470.
Alsugair, A. M. (1999). “Framework for evaluating bids of construction contractors.” J. Manage. Eng., 15(2), 72–78.
Benjamin, N. B. H. (1972). “Competitive bidding: The probability of winning.” J. Constr. Div., 98(2), 313–330.
Carr, R. I. (1982). “General bidding model.” J. Constr. Div., 108(4), 639–650.
Case, K. E., and Fair, R. C. (1999). Principles of economics, 5th Ed., Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
Chamberlin, E. H. (1933). Theory of monopolistic competition, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA, 56–57.
Chintagunta, P. K., Jain, D. C., and Vilcassim, N. J. (1991). “Investigating heterogeneity in brand preferences in logit models for panel data.” J. Market Res., 28(4), 417–428.
Clemen, R. T. (1996). Making hard decisions: An introduction to decision analysis, Duxbury Press, Belmont, CA.
Crowley, L. G. (2000). “Friedman and Gates—Another Look.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 126(4), 306–312.
Dixie, J. M. (1974). “Bidding models—The final resolution of a controversy.” J. Constr. Div., 100(3), 265–271.
Dolan, R. J., and Simon, H. (1996). Power pricing: How managing price transforms the bottom line, Free Press, New York.
El-Rayes, K. (2001). “Optimum planning of highway construction under A+B bidding method.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 127(4), 273–281.
Engelbrecht-Wiggans, R. (1980). “Auctions and bidding models: A survey.” J. Manage. Sci., 26(2), 119–142.
Friedman, L. (1956). ‘‘A competitive-bidding strategy.’’ Oper. Res., 4(1), 104–112.
Gale, B. T., and Swire, D. J. (2006). “Customer value accounting for value-based pricing.” J. Prof. Pric., 15(3), 30–34.
Gates, M. (1967). “Bidding strategies and probabilities.” J. Constr. Div., 93(1), 75–107.
Gonzalez-Diaz, M., Arrunada, B., and Fernandez, A. (2000). “Causes of subcontracting: Evidence from panel data on construction firms.” J. Econ. Behav. Organiz., 42(2), 167–187.
Gransberg, D. D., and Ellicott, M. A. (1997). “Best-value contracting criteria.” Cost Eng., 39(6), 31–34.
Griffis, F. H. (1992). “Bidding strategy: Winning over key competitors.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 118(1), 151–165.
Herbsman, Z. J., Chen, W. T., and Epstein, W. C. (1995). “Time is money: Innovative contracting methods in highway construction.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 121(3), 273–281.
Herbsman, Z. J., and Glagola, C. R. (1998). “Lane rental—Innovative way to reduce road construction time.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 124(5), 411–417.
Hillebrandt, P. M. (1974). Economic theory and the construction industry, Macmillan, London.
Holt, G. D. (1998). “Which contractor selection methodology?” Int. J. Project Manage., 16(3), 153–164.
Ioannou, P. G. (1988). “Bidding models—Symmetry and state of information.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 114(2), 214–232.
Jain, D. C., Vilcassim, N. J., and Chintagunta, P. K. (1994). “A random coefficients logit brand-choice model applied to panel data.” J. Bus. Econ. Stat., 12(3), 317–328.
Lai, K. K., Liu, S. L., and Wang, S. Y. (2004). “A method used for evaluating bids in the Chinese construction industry.” Int. J. Project Manage., 22(3), 193–201.
Ministry of Justice of Taiwan (MOJ). (2009). Analysis of BV application in county government procurement projects, Special rep. on government ethics, Meeting 133 〈http://www.moj.gov.tw/public/Data/6616141146181.doc〉 (Nov. 1, 2009) (in Chinese).
Ngai, S., Drew, D., Lo, H. P., and Skitmore, M. (2002). “A theoretical framework for determining the minimum number of bidders in construction bidding competitions.” Constr. Manage. Econ., 20(6), 473–482.
Oo, B. L., Drew, D. S., and Lo, H. P. (2008). “Heterogeneous approach to modeling contractors’ decision-to-bid strategies.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 134(10), 766–775.
Oo, B. L., Drew, D. S., and Lo, H. P. (2010). “Modeling the heterogeneity in contractors’ mark-up behavior.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 136(7), 720–729.
Perng, Y. H., Juan, Y. K., and Chien, S. F. (2006). “Exploring the bidding situation for economically most advantageous tender projects using a bidding game.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 132(10), 1037–1042.
Public Construction Commission. (2008). “Regulations for evaluation of the most advantageous tender.” Article 11, Government Procurement Related Regulations, Executive Yuan, Taipei, Taiwan.
Runeson, G., and Raftery, J. (1998). “Neo-classical microeconomics as an analytical tool for construction price determination.” J. Constr. Procure., 4(2), 116–131.
Runeson, G., and Skitmore, M. (1999). “Tendering theory revisited.” Constr. Manage. Econ., 17(3), 285–296.
Samuelson, P. A., and Nordhaus, W. D. (2001). Microeconomics, 17th Ed., McGraw-Hill, New York, 110.
Scherer, F. M. (1980). Industrial market structure and economic performance, Houghton Mifflin, Boston, 200–201.
Shen, L., Drew, D., and Zhang, Z. (1999). “Optimal bid model for price-time biparameter construction contracts.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 125(3), 204–209.
Skitmore, M. (1991). “The construction contract bidder homogeneity assumption: An empirical test.” Constr. Manage. Econ., 9(5), 403–429.
Skitmore, M. (2002). “Raftery curve construction for tender price forecasts.” Constr. Manage. Econ., 20(1), 83–89.
Skitmore, M. (2004). “Predicting the probability of winning sealed bid auctions: The effects of outliers on bidding models.” Constr. Manage. Econ., 22(1), 101–109.
Skitmore, M., Pettitt, A. N., and McVinish, R. (2007). “Gates’ bidding model.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 133(11), 855–863.
Skitmore, M., and Runeson, G. (2006). “Bidding models: Testing the stationarity assumption.” Constr. Manage. Econ., 24(8), 791–803.
Skitmore, M., Runeson, G., and Chang, X. (2006). “Construction price formation: Full-cost pricing or neoclassical microeconomic theory?” Constr. Manage. Econ., 24(7), 773–783.
Skitmore, M., and Smyth, H. (2007). “Pricing construction work: A marketing viewpoint.” Constr. Manage. Econ., 25(6), 619–630.
Verbeke, G., and Lesaffre, E. (1996). “A linear mixed-effects model with heterogeneity in the random-effects population.” J. Am. Stat. Assoc., 91(433), 217–221.
Wang, K. W., and Yu, W. D. (2007). “Analyzing tender selection using a geometric graph analysis (GGA) approach.” Proc., 25th Construction Management and Economics Conf., Univ. of Reading, Reading, UK.
Wong, C. H., Holt, G. D., and Cooper, P. A. (2000). “Lowest price or value? Investigation of UK construction clients’ tender selection process.” Constr. Manage. Econ., 18(7), 767–774.
Yu, W. D., and Lo, S. S. (2005). “Time-dependent construction social costs model.” Constr. Manage. Econ., 23(3), 327–337.
Zhang, X. (2004). “Concessionaire selection: Methods and criteria.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 130(2), 235–244.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Volume 139Issue 6June 2013
Pages: 675 - 684

History

Received: Sep 11, 2010
Accepted: Aug 28, 2012
Published online: Aug 31, 2012
Published in print: Jun 1, 2013

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Professor, Dept. of Construction Management, Chung Hua Univ., 707, Wu-Fu Rd., Sec. 2, Shiang-Sang, Hsinchu, Taiwan 30012, ROC (corresponding author). E-mail: [email protected]
Kwo-Wuu Wang
Director, Procurement Center, Armaments Bureau, Ministry of National Defense, 172. Bo’ai Rd., Zhongzheng Dist., Taipei City, Taiwan 10048, ROC.
Ming-Teh Wang
Professor, Dept. of Construction Management, Chung Hua Univ., 707, Wu-Fu Rd., Sec. 2, Shiang-Sang, Hsinchu, Taiwan 30012, ROC.

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share