Technical Papers
Jul 28, 2012

Federal Acquisition Regulation Applied to Alliancing Contract Practices

Publication: Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Volume 139, Issue 5

Abstract

The U.S. federal construction sector led the development of partnering as a project-delivery method and continues to use it as standard practice. Alliancing has since emerged as an evolution of the partnering method and offers substantial advantages over partnering, but it also poses more difficulties with federal acquisition regulations. This research aims to determine if an alliancing contract can be effectively utilized in federal construction and, if so, to create a framework under which federal agencies can utilize the advantages of alliance contracts within existing regulations. A commercially available standard form alliancing contract was selected for analysis against the Federal Acquisition Regulation. Key practices that characterize the alliancing method were identified. Utilizing a panel of federal contracting experts, qualitative data were gathered to analyze which of these key practices do or do not comply with federal regulations, why certain practices do not comply, and how those practices could achieve compliance. The results show that most alliancing key practices can be utilized in a federal construction project. Although other practices cannot be used effectively under current regulations, these limitations do not significantly hinder the use of a comprehensive and effective federal alliancing contract.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Acknowledgments

The writers would like to thank the excellent contract review participants and the Air Force Center for Engineering and the Environment for their invaluable contribution to this work.
The views expressed in this article are those of the writers and do not reflect the official policy or position of the U.S. Air Force, Department of Defense, the U.S. Government, or the Air Force Institute of Technology.

References

Chan, A. P., Chan, D. W., and Yeung, J. F. (2010). Relational contracting for construction excellence, Spon Press, New York.
ConsensusDOCS. (2007). ConsensusDOCS 300: Standard form of tri-party agreement for collaborative project delivery, ConsensusDOCS LLC, Arlington, VA.
ConsensusDOCS. (2010). “About ConsensusDOCS.” 〈http://consensusdocs.org/about/〉 (Oct. 27, 2010).
Dept. of the Air Force. (2006). “Associate contractor agreements.”, Department of Defense, Washington, DC.
Dept. of Treasury, and Finance. (2009). “Project alliancing.” State Government of Victoria, Australia 〈http://www.dtf.vic.gov.au/CA25713E0002EF43/pages/project-alliancing〉 (Feb. 15, 2010).
Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR). (2005). 〈https://www.acquisition.gov/far/current/pdf/FAR.pdf〉 (Feb. 17, 2011).
Gannon, T. W. (2011). “Understanding schedule forecasting shortfalls in federal design-build facility procurement.” M.S. thesis, AFIT/GEM/ENV/11M-02, Air Force Institute of Technology (AU), Wright-Patterson AFB, Dayton, OH.
Gerard, J. (1995). “Construction.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 121(3), 319–328.
Naoum, S. (2003). “An overview into the concept of partnering.” Int. J. Project Manage., 21(1), 71–76.
NEC. (2010). “What is the NEC?” 〈http://www.neccontract.com/about/index.asp〉 (Oct. 27, 2010).
Perlberg, B. M. (2009). Contracting for integrated project delivery: ConsensusDOCS, Victor O. Schinnerer and Co., Inc, Chevy Chase, MD.
Post, N. M. (2010). “Integrated-project-delivery boosters ignore many flashing red lights.” Engineering news record, 〈ENR.com〉 (May 5, 2010).
SAF/AQCS (Deputy Assistant Secretary for Contracting, Office of the Assistant Secretary of the Air Force for Acquisition). (1998). Air force indemnification guide for unusually hazardous or nuclear risks revision A, Pentagon, Washington, DC.
Sakal, M. W. (2005). “Project alliancing: A relational contracting mechanism for dynamic projects.” Lean Constr. J., 2(1), 67–79.
Sanders, S. R., and Moore, M. M. (1992). “Perceptions of partnering in the public sector.” Project Manage. J., 23(4), 13–19.
Schroer, C. R. (1994). “Corps of engineer’s perspective on partnering.” The use of partnering in the facilities design process: Summary of a symposium, Federal Construction Council, ed., National Academy Press, Washington, DC.
Secretary of the Navy. (2007). “Use of binding arbitration for contract controversies.”, U.S. Dept. of the Navy, Washington, DC.
Suhr, Jim. (1999). The choosing by advantages decision making system, Quorum Books, Westport, CT.
The American Institute of Architects (AIA). (2009). “Standard form multi-party agreement for integrated project delivery.”, Washington, DC.
The American Institute of Architects (AIA). (2010a). “Integrated project deliver: Case studies.” AIA California Council, Sacramento, CA.
The American Institute of Architects (AIA). (2010b). “History of AIA contract documents.” 〈http://www.aia.org/contractdocs/AIAS076671〉 (Oct. 27, 2010).
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. (2010). “Partnering: A tool for USACE, engineering, construction, and operations.”, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Institute for Water Resources, Fort Belvoir, VA.
Walker, D. H. T., Hampson, K., and Peters, R. (2002). “Project alliancing vs project partnering: A case study of the Australian National Museum project.” Supply Chain Manage., 7(2), 83–91.
Weston, D., and Gibson, G. (1993). “Partnering project performance in U.S. Army Corps of Engineers.” J. Manage. Eng., 9(4), 331–344.
Yin, R. K. (2009). Case study research design and methods, Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Volume 139Issue 5May 2013
Pages: 480 - 487

History

Received: Oct 24, 2011
Accepted: Jul 24, 2012
Published online: Jul 27, 2012
Published ahead of production: Jul 28, 2012
Published in print: May 1, 2013

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Travis R. Johnson [email protected]
P.E.
Capt, USAF, 820th RED HORSE Squadron, Nellis AFB, NV 89191 (corresponding author). E-mail: [email protected]
Peter Feng, Ph.D. [email protected]
P.E.
M.ASCE
Lt Col, USAF, Air Force Institute of Technology, Wright Patterson AFB, OH 45433. E-mail: [email protected]
William Sitzabee, Ph.D. [email protected]
P.E.
Lt Col, USAF, Air Force Institute of Technology, Wright Patterson AFB, OH 45433. E-mail: [email protected]
Mark Jernigan [email protected]
Instructor, The Civil Engineer School, Air Force Institute of Technology, Wright Patterson AFB, OH 45433. E-mail: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share