Hybrid Approach to the Study of Inter-Organization High Performance Teams
Publication: Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Volume 139, Issue 4
Abstract
As construction projects increase in scale and complexity, a major challenge is to ensure the effective transfer of relevant information to the right entities to make decisions, manage conflict, and solve challenges, which will allow organizations to achieve the goals of the project. Project teams whose members have the necessary attitudes, competencies, and skills to overcome this challenge are often termed high performing teams (HPTs). Building on recent studies about HPTs, this paper proposes a hybrid methodology that uses network theory and the jobs-to-be-done framework for the study of teams that aspire to develop high performance. Social network analysis (SNA) provides a reactive approach to the study of team connectivity and hierarchical leadership patterns and is complemented by the jobs-to-be-done framework that focuses on the drivers of the behavior of the various project organizations. The paper demonstrates these concepts by analyzing the characteristics of HPTs through a case study on a healthcare construction project. With this in mind, the contributions of this paper are twofold. The paper introduces jobs to be done as a proactive approach to initial team and work process design, given its focus on stakeholder motivations. In addition, the combination of SNA and jobs to be done allows the pursuit and iterative examination of both drivers of stakeholder behavior and their mechanisms of interaction, which generates more comprehensive insights than when each technique is used independently. Thus, this hybrid approach could facilitate the proactive design and refinement of HPTs.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
Acknowledgments
The authors would like to thank the anonymous construction company that provided partial funding for this study and allowed access to several of their projects. Partial funding for this study was also provided by the Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnologia (CONACYT) Mexico. This paper does not reflect the views of CONACYT.
References
Albanese, R. (1994). “Team-building process: key to better project results.” J. Manage. Eng., 10(6), 36–44.
Anthony, S., Johnson, M., Sinfield, J., and Altman, E. (2008). The innovator’s guide to growth: putting disruptive innovation to work, Harvard Business School Press, Boston.
Borgatti, S. P., and Molina, J. L. (2003). “Ethical and strategic issues in organizational social networks.” J. Appl. Behav. Sci., 39(3), 337–349.
Brass, D., Galaskiewicz, J., Greve, H., and Tsai, W. (2004). “Taking stock of networks and organizations: A multilevel perspective.” Acad. Manage. J., 47(6), 795–817.
Braun, V., and Clarke, V. (2006). “Using thematic analysis in psychology.” Qual. Res. Psychol., 3(2), 77–101.
Bresnen, M., and Marshall, N. (2000). “Partnering in construction: A critical review of issues, problems and dilemmas.” Construct. Manage. Econ., 18(2), 229–237.
Chinowsky, P., Diekmann, J., and Galotti, V. (2008). “Social network model of construction.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 134(10), 804–812.
Chinowsky, P., Diekmann, J., and O’Brien, J. (2010). “Project organizations as social networks.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 136(4), 452–458.
Chinowsky, P., Taylor, J., and Di Marco, M. (2011). “Project network interdependency alignment: New approach to assessing project effectiveness.” J. Manage. Eng., 27(3), 170–178.
Christensen, C., Anthony, S., Berstell, G., and Nitterhouse, D. (2007). “Finding the right job for your product.” MIT Sloan Manage. Rev., 48(3), 38–47.
Cross, R., Ehrlich, K., Dawson, R., and Helferich, J. (2008). “Managing collaboration: Improving team effectiveness through a network perspective.” Calif. Manage. Rev., 50(4), 74–98.
Cross, R., and Parker, A. (2004). The hidden power of social networks: Understanding how work really gets done in organizations, Harvard Business School Press, Boston.
de Nooy, W., Mrvar, A., and Batagelj, V. (2005). Exploratory social network analysis with Pajek, Cambridge University Press, New York.
Denzin, N. (1978). Sociological methods: A sourcebook, 2nd Ed., McGraw Hill, New York.
Di Marco, M., Taylor, J., and Alin, P. (2010). “Emergence and role of cultural boundary spanners in global engineering project networks.” J. Manage. Eng., 26(3), 123–132.
Dyer, J., and Nobeoka, K. (2000). “Creating and managing a high-performance knowledge-sharing network: The Toyota case.” Strat. Manage. J., 21(3), 345–367.
Dyer, J., and Singh, H. (1998). “The relational view: Cooperative strategy and sources of interorganizational competitive advantage.” Acad. Manage. Rev., 23(4), 660–679.
Dyer, W., Schein, E., and Dyer, J. (2007). Team building: Proven strategies for improving team performance, Jossey-Bass, San Francisco.
Eisenhardt, K. (1989). “Building theories from case study research.” Acad. Manage. Rev., 14(4), 532–550.
Eisenhardt, K., and Graebner, M. (2007). “Theory building from cases: Opportunities and challenges.” Acad. Manage. J., 50(1), 25–32.
Glaser, B., and Strauss, A. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research, Aldine, Chicago.
Gulati, R. (1998). “Alliances and networks.” Strat. Manage. J., 19(4), 293–317.
Ireland, R., Hitt, M., and Vaidyanath, D. (2002). “Alliance management as a source of competitive advantage.” J. Manage., 28(3), 413–446.
Kahn, W. (1993). “Caring for the caregivers: Patterns of organizational caregiving.” Admin. Sci. Q., 38(4), 539–563.
Kahn, W., Cross, R., and Parker, A. (2003). “Layers of diagnosis for planned relational change in organizations.” J. Appl. Behav. Sci., 39(3), 259–280.
Kale, P., and Singh, H. (2009). “Managing strategic alliances: What do we know now, and where do we go from here?” Acad. Manage. Perspect., 23(3), 45–62.
Kale, P., Singh, H., and Perlmutter, H. (2000). “Learning and protection of proprietary assets in strategic alliances: Building relational capital.” Strat. Manage. J., 21(3), 217–237.
Katzenbach, J., and Smith, D. (1993). “The discipline of teams.” Harv. Bus. Rev., 71(2), 111–120.
Krackhardt, D. (1992). “The strength of network ties: The importance of philos in organizations.” Networks and organizations: Structure, form and action, N., Nohria, and R., Eccles, eds., Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA, 216–239.
Larson, E. (1997). “Partnering on construction projects: A study of the relationship between partnering activities and project success.” IEEE Trans. Eng. Manage., 44(2), 188–195.
Loosemore, M. (1998). “Social network analysis: Using a quantitative tool within an interpretative context to explore the management of construction crises.” Eng. Constr. Architect. Manage., 5(4), 315–326.
Mead, S. (2001). “Using social network analysis to visualize project teams.” Proj. Manage. J., 32(4), 32–38.
Mohr, J., and Spekman, R. (1994). “Characteristics of partnership success: Partnership attributes, communication behavior, and conflict resolution techniques.” Strat. Manage. J., 15(2), 135–152.
Patton, M. (2002). Qualitative research and evaluation methods, Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA.
Phelps, A., and Horman, M. (2010). “Ethnographic theory building research in construction.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 136(1), 58–65.
Powell, W., Koput, K., and Smith-Doerr, L. (1996). “Interorganizational collaboration and the locus of innovation: Networks of learning in biotechnology.” Admin. Sci. Q., 41(1), 116–145.
Pryke, S. D. (2005). “Towards a social network theory of project governance.” Constr. Manage. Econ., 23(9), 927–939.
Ring, P., and Van de Ven, A. (1994). “Developmental processes of cooperative interorganizational relationships.” Acad. Manage. Rev., 19(1), 90–118.
Rowley, T., Behrens, D., and Krackhardt, D. (2000). “Redundant governance structures: An analysis of structural and relational embeddedness in the steel and semiconductor industries.” Strat. Manage. J., 21(3), 369–386.
Schreiner, M., Kale, P., and Corsten, D. (2009). “What really is alliance management capability and how does it impact alliance outcomes and success?” Strat. Manage. J., 30(13), 1395–1419.
Son, J., and Rojas, E. (2009). “Understanding collaborative working processes of temporary project teams in large scale construction projects.” Proc., Construction Research Congress 2009, Construction Institute of ASCE, Reston, VA, 856–865.
Son, J., and Rojas, E. M. (2011). “Evolution of collaboration in temporary project teams: an agent-based modeling and simulation approach.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 137(8), 619–628.
Spradley, J. (1979). The ethnographic interview, Cengage Learning, Independence, KY.
Strauss, A., and Corbin, J. (1998). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory, Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA.
Tushman, M., and Scanlan, T. (1981). “Boundary spanning individuals: Their role in information transfer and their antecedents.” Acad. Manage. J., 24(2), 289–305.
Unsal, H. I., and Taylor, J. E. (2011). “Modeling interfirm dependency: Game theoretic simulation to examine the holdup problem in project networks.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 137(4), 284–293.
Wasserman, S., and Faust, K. (1994). Social network analysis: Methods and applications, Cambridge University Press, New York.
Yin, R. (2009). Case study research: Design and methods, Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Volume 139 • Issue 4 • April 2013
Pages: 379 - 392
Copyright
© 2013 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: Jun 29, 2011
Accepted: Apr 3, 2012
Published online: Nov 5, 2012
Published in print: Apr 1, 2013
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.