Impact of Public Policy and Societal Risk Perception on U.S. Civilian Nuclear Power Plant Construction
Publication: Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Volume 138, Issue 8
Abstract
Due to the increasing demand for energy in the United States, the Nuclear Regulatory Commission is currently reviewing permit applications for 26 new nuclear power reactors. However, the previous generation of U.S. civilian nuclear plant construction experienced significant cost and schedule overruns. Previous research identified “regulatory ratcheting” (continuous, retroactive change in nuclear plant regulations) as one of the primary causes of this poor performance. Regulatory ratcheting was enabled by the nuclear industry’s two-step permitting and licensing process for civilian power plant construction, which allowed society’s perception of the risks associated with nuclear plant operation to impact nuclear plant construction. How will public policy and societal risk perception affect the next generation of U.S. civilian nuclear plant construction? This question is investigated using a dynamic simulation model of the public policy and social feedback processes that impact U.S. nuclear plant construction. The research reveals that proposed strategies to address public policy and societal issues, such as a new nuclear regulatory process and smaller, less expensive reactors, may not prevent cost and schedule overruns on the planned next generation of nuclear plants. Results point to the critical role societal perceptions of nuclear power risk play in nuclear construction project success.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
Arditi, D., and Kirsininkas, A. (1985). Transitions in the nuclear industry, ASCE, New York.
Aron, J. (1997). License to kill? The nuclear regulatory commission and the Shoreham power plant, University of Pittsburgh Press, Pittsburgh.
ASCE. (2008). Civil engineering body of knowledge for the 21st century, ASCE, Reston, VA.
Atomic Industrial Forum. (1956). “Public relations for the atomic industry.” Proc. of a Meeting for Members, The Univ. of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, 1–160.
Chu, S. (2011). “America’s new nuclear option.” Wall Street Journal, 〈www.wsj.com〉 (Apr. 18, 2011).
Cohen, B. (1983). Before it’s too late: A scientist’s case for nuclear energy. Plenum, New York.
Cohen, B. (1990). The nuclear energy option: An alternative for the 90s, Plenum, New York.
Cohn, S. (1997). Too cheap to meter: An economic and philosophical analysis of the nuclear dream, State University of New York Press, Albany, NY.
Congressional Budget Office. (2008). Nuclear power’s role in generating electricity, Publication No. 2986.
Duffy, R. (1997). Nuclear politics in America: A history and theory of government regulation, University of Kansas Press, Lawrence, KS.
Energy Information Administration (EIA). (1988). “Nuclear power plant construction activity.” DOE/EIA-0473(88), Washington, DC.
Energy Information Administration (EIA). (1992). “Electric plant cost and power production expenses 1990.” DOE/EIA-0455(90), Washington, DC.
Energy Information Administration (EIA). (2008). “Electricity net generation 1949-2006.” 〈www.eia.doe.gov〉 (Jun. 16, 2008).
Espinoza, J. (2011). “Future of nuclear energy.” 〈www.wsj.com〉 (Nov. 7, 2011).
Feldman, S. L., Bernstein, M. A., and Noland, R. B. (1988). “The costs of completing unfinished US nuclear power plants.” Energy PolicyENPYAC, 16(3), 270–279.
Ford, A. (1997). “System dynamics and the electric power industry.” Sys. Dyn. Rev.SDREEG, 13(1), 57–85.
Ford, A. (1999). Modeling the environment, Island, Washington, DC.
Forrester, J. (1961). Industrial dynamics, Pegasus Communications, Waltham, MA.
Forrester, J. W. (1980). “Information sources for modeling the national economy.” J. Am. Stat. Assoc.JSTNAL, 75(371), 555–566.
Forrester, J., and Senge, P. (1980). “Test for building confidence in system dynamics models.” TIMS studies in the management sciences, Legasto, A. Jr., Forrester, J., and Lyneis, J., eds., Vol. 14, North Holland Press, Amsterdam.
Foster, M., and Jahn, G. (2011). “Most nuclear plants on track outside of Japan and Germany.” 〈www.enr.con〉 (May 12, 2011).
Friedrich, D. R., Daly, J. P. Jr., and Dick, W. G. (1987). “Revisions, repairs, and rework on large projects.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage.JCEMD4, 113(3), 488–500.
Greenhalgh, G. (1980). The necessity for nuclear power, Graham & Trotman, London.
Jones, J. (2009). “Support for nuclear energy inches up to new highs.” 〈www.gallup.com〉 (Jul. 29, 2010).
Jones, J. (2010). “U.S. support for nuclear power climbs to new high of 62%.” 〈www.gallup.com〉 (Jul. 29, 2010).
Kasperson, J., Kasperson, R., Berberian, M., and Pacenka, L. (2005). The social contours of risk: Publics, risk communication, and the social amplification of risk, Vol. 1, Earthscan, London.
Kingdon, J. (2003). Agendas, alternatives, and public policies, 2nd Ed., Longman, New York.
Kuhn, T. (1962, 1970). The structure of scientific revolutions, 2nd Ed., University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
Lillington, J. (2004). The future of nuclear power, Elsevier, UK.
McCutcheon, C. (2002). Nuclear reactions: The politics of opening a radioactive waste disposal site, University of New Mexico Press, Albuquerque, NM.
Moore, P. (2006). “Going nuclear: A green makes the case.” The Washington Post, April 6. 〈www.washingtonpost.com〉 (Jul. 29, 2010).
Nealey, S., Melber, B., and Rankin, W. (1983). Public opinion and nuclear energy, Lexington Books, Lexington, MA.
Nuclear Energy Institute. (2010). “Perspectives on public opinion.” 〈www.nei.org〉 (Jul. 29, 2010).
Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC). (1975). “Reactor safety study: An assessment of accident risks in U.S. commercial nuclear power plants.” WASH-1400 NUREG 75/014, Washington, DC.
Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC). (2004). “Nuclear power plant licensing process.” NUREG/BR-0298, Rev. 1, Washington, DC.
Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC). (2010). “Expected new nuclear power plant application schedule.” 〈www.nrc.gov〉 (Jun. 29, 2010).
Olyneic, J. (1985). Transitions in the nuclear industry, ASCE, New York.
Rothman, S., and Lichter, S. R. (1987). “Elite ideology and risk perception in nuclear energy policy.” Amer. Pol. Sci. Rev., 81(2), 383–404.
Slovic, P. (1987). “Perception of risks.” Science, 236(4799), 280–285.
Slovic, P., Fischhoff, B., and Lichtenstein, S. (1979). “Rating the risks.” EnvironmentENVTAR, 21(3), 14–39.
Smith, R. (2009). “The new nukes.” The Wall Street Journal, September 8, 2009.
Smith, R. (2010). “Small reactors generate big hopes.” The Wall Street Journal, February 18, 2010.
Smith, R. (2011). “NRG drops plan for Texas reactors.” The Wall Street Journal, April 20, 2011.
Sutherland, R., Ford, A., Jackson, S., Mangeng, C., Hardie, R., and Malenfant, R. (1985). The future market for electric generating capacity: Technical documentation, LA-10285-MS, Los Alamos National Laboratory.
Sterman, J. D. (1985). “The growth of knowledge: Testing a theory of scientific revolutions with a formal model.” Technol. Forecast. Soc. ChangeTFSCB3, 28(2), 93–122.
Sterman, J. (2000). Business dynamics: Systems thinking and modeling for a complex world, Irwin McGraw-Hill, Boston.
Takemoto, Y., and Katz, A. (2008). “Samurai-sword maker’s reactor monopoly may cool nuclear revival.” 〈www.bloomberg.com〉 (Jun. 29, 2010).
Taylor, T. (2009). “The role of science, engineering, and technology in the public policy process for infrastructure and natural systems.” Doctoral thesis, Texas A&M Univ., College Station, TX.
Taylor, T. R. B., and Ford, D. N. (2008). “Managing tipping point dynamics in complex construction projects.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage.JCEMD4, 134(6), 421–431.
Taylor, T. R. B., Ford, D. N., and Ford, A. (2010). “Improving model understanding using statistical screening.” Sys. Dyn. Rev.SDREEG, 26(1), 73–87.
Taylor, T. R. B., Ford, D. N., Yvon-Lewis, S. A., and Lindquist, E. (2011). “Science, engineering, and technology in the policy process for mitigating natural-societal risk.” Sys. Dyn. Rev.SDREEG, 27(2), 173–194.
Union of Concerned Scientists (UCS). (1977). “The risks of nuclear power reactors: A review of the NRC Reactor Safety Study.” WASH-1400 (NUREG-75/014), Union of Concerned Scientists, Cambridge, MA.
Weingart, J. (2001). Waste is a terrible thing to mind: Risk, radiation, and distrust of government, Center for Analysis of Public Issues, Princeton, NJ.
White House. (2010). “Obama administration announces loan guarantees to construct new nuclear power reactors in Georgia.” 〈www.whitehouse.gov〉 (Jun. 29, 2010).
Wilson, R., and Crouch, E. A. (1987). “Risk assessment and comparisons: An introduction.” ScienceSCIEAS, 236(4799), 267–270.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Volume 138 • Issue 8 • August 2012
Pages: 972 - 981
Copyright
© 2012. American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: Sep 10, 2010
Accepted: Dec 6, 2011
Published online: Dec 8, 2011
Published in print: Aug 1, 2012
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.