Technical Papers
Oct 26, 2011

Performance Dashboard for a Pharmaceutical Project Benchmarking Program

Publication: Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Volume 138, Issue 7

Abstract

Performance measurement is essential to controlling and improving capital projects. Increasingly, industry sectors demand an industry-specific performance measurement system because their unique processes can result in significant differences in performance outcomes. This paper presents the development of a performance dashboard for a pharmaceutical project benchmarking program. The proposed approach adopts a relative comparison method and uses weighted key performance indicators (KPIs) to compare project performance. The dashboard generates an overall performance score both at the project level and at the company level, as shown in tabular and graphical formats. The dashboard provides flexibility for comparing the performance of projects even when the project types or KPIs are different. Although the study focuses on a performance dashboard for pharmaceutical industry projects, the dashboard development process described in this paper can be applied to other industry projects.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

References

Abdel-Razek, R. H., Elshakour, M. H., and Abdel-Hamid, M. (2007). “Labor productivity: Benchmarking and variability in egyptian projects.” Int. J. Proj. Manage.IPMAEL, 25(2), 189–197.
Amaratunga, D., Baldry, D., and Sarshar, M. (2001). “Process improvement through performance measurement: The balanced scorecard methodology.” Work StudyWSMAAM, 50(5), 179–189.
Audit Office of New South Wales. (1999). Performance audit report: Key performance indicators, Sydney, Australia.
Bassioni, H. A., Price, A. D. F., and Hassan, T. M. (2004). “Performance measurement in construction.” J. Manage. Eng.JMENEA, 20(2), 42–50.
Bassioni, H. A., Price, A. D. F., and Hassan, T. M. (2005). “Building a conceptual framework for measuring business performance in construction: An empirical evaluation.” Constr. Manage. Econ., 23(5), 495–507.
Beatham, S., Anumba, C., Thorpe, T., and Hedges, I. (2004). “KPIs: A critical appraisal of their use in construction.” Benchmarking, 11(1), 93–117.
Chan, A. P. C., Scott, D., and Chan, A. P. L. (2004). “Factors affecting the success of a construction project.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage.JCEMD4, 130(1), 153–155.
Construction Industry Institute (CII). (2010a). “Owner pharmaceutical questionnaire version 10.2.” 〈https://www.construction-institute.org/scriptcontent/BM_GUEST/downloads/Owner_Pharma_v10_2.pdf〉 (Jan. 28, 2010).
Construction Industry Institute (CII). (2010b). “About CII.” 〈https://www.construction-institute.org/scriptcontent/aboutcii.cfm?section=aboutcii〉 (Jan. 28, 2010).
Cox, R. F., Issa, R. R. A., and Ahrens, D. (2003). “Management’s perception of key performance indicators for construction.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage.JCEMD4, 129(2), 142–151.
Eccles, R. G. (1991). “The performance measurement manifesto.” Harv. Bus. Rev.HABRAX, 69(1), 131–137.
Eckerson, W. W. (2006). Performance dashboards: Measuring, monitoring, and managing your business, Wiley, New York.
El-Mashaleh, M., Minchin, R. E. Jr., and O’Brien, W. J. (2007). “Management of construction firm performance using benchmarking.” J. Manage. Eng.JMENEA, 23(1), 10–17.
Fong, P. S., Shen, Q., and Cheng, E. W. L. (2001). “A framework for benchmarking the value management process.” Benchmarking, 8(4), 306–316.
Hwang, B. G., Thomas, S. R., Degezelle, D., and Caldas, C. H. (2008). “Development of a benchmarking framework for pharmaceutical capital projects.” Constr. Manage. Econ., 26(2), 177–195.
Kagioglou, M., Cooper, R., and Aouad, G. (2001). “Performance management in construction: A conceptual framework.” Constr. Manage. Econ., 19(1), 85–95.
Kaplan, R. S., and Norton, D. P. (1992). “The balanced scorecard measures that drive performance.” Harv. Bus. Rev.HABRAX, 70(1), 71–79.
Key Performance Indicators (KPI) Working Group. (2000). KPI report for the Minister for Construction, Dept. of the Environment, Transport and the Regions, London.
Kim, I.-H. (2007). “Development and implementation of an engineering productivity measurement system (EPMS) for benchmarking.” Ph.D. dissertation, Univ. of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX.
Kumaraswamy, M. M., and Thorpe, A. (1996). “Systematizing construction project evaluations.” J. Manage. Eng.JMENEA, 12(1), 34–39.
Lee, S. H., Thomas, S. R., and Tucker, R. L. (2005). “Web-based benchmarking system for the construction industry.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage.JCEMD4, 131(7), 790–798.
Li, H., Cheng, E. W. L., Love, P. E. D., and Irani, Z. (2001). “Co-operative benchmarking: a tool for partnering excellence in construction.” Int. J. Proj. Manage.IPMAEL, 19(3), 171–179.
Love, P. E. D., Irani, Z., and Edwards, D. J. (2004). “Industry-centric benchmarking of information technology benefits, costs and risks for small-to-medium sized enterprises in construction.” Autom. Constr., 13(4), 507–524.AUCOES
Luu, T. V., Kim, S. Y., Cao, H. L., and Park, Y. M. (2008). “Performance measurement of construction firms in developing countries.” Constr. Manage. Econ., 26(4), 373–386.
McGeorge, W. D., Palmer, A., and London, K. (2002). Construction management: New directions, Wiley-Blackwell, Hoboken, NJ.
Mohamed, S. (2003). “Scorecard approach to benchmarking organizational safety culture in construction.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 129(1), 80–88.JCEMD4
Neely, A., Gregory, M., and Platts, K. (1995). “Performance measurement system design.” Int. J. Oper. Prod. Manage., 15(4), 80–116.
Nitithamyong, P., and Skibniewski, M. J. (2006). “Success/failure factors and performance measures of web-based construction project management systems: Professionals’ viewpoint.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage.JCEMD4, 132(1), 80–87.
Palaneeswaran, M. M., and Kumaraswamy, M. M. (2000). “Benchmarking contractor selection practices in public-sector construction: A proposed model.” Eng. Constr. Archit. Manage., 7(3), 285–299.
Park, H. S., Thomas, S. R., and Tucker, R. L. (2005). “Benchmarking of construction productivity.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage.JCEMD4, 131(7), 772–778.
Parker, C. (2000). “Performance measurement.” Work StudyWSMAAM, 49(2), 63–66.
Ramirez, R. R., Alarcon, L. F. C., and Knights, P. (2004). “Benchmarking system for evaluating management practices in the construction industry.” J. Manage. Eng.JMENEA, 20(3), 110–117.
Sommerville, J., and Robertson, H. W. (2000). “A scorecard approach to benchmarking for total quality construction.” Int. J. Qual. Reliab. Manage., 17(4/5), 453–466.
Stewart, R. A., and Mohamed, S. (2001). “Utilizing the balanced scorecard for IT/IS performance evaluation in construction.” Constr. Innovation-London, 1(3), 147–164.
Toor, S. R., and Ogunlana, S. O. (2010). “Beyond the ‘iron triangle’: Stakeholder perception of key performance indicators (KPIs) for large-scale public sector development projects.” Int. J. Proj. Manage.IPMAEL, 28(3), 228–236.
U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). (2010). “Drug applications and current good manufacturing practice (CGMP) regulations.” 〈http://www.fda.gov/Drugs/DevelopmentApprovalProcess/Manufacturing/ucm090016.htm〉 (Jan. 28, 2010).
Ward, S. C., Curtis, B., and Chapman, C. B. (1991). “Objectives and performance in construction projects.” Constr. Manage. Econ., 9(4), 343–353.
Yeung, J. F., Chan, A. P. C., and Chan, D. W. C. (2009). “Developing a performance index for relationship-based construction projects in Australia: Delphi study.” J. Manage. Eng., 25(2), 59–68.JMENEA
Yu, I., Kim, K., Jung, Y., and Chin, S. (2007). “Comparable performance measurement system for construction companies.” J. Manage. Eng., 23(3), 131–139.JMENEA

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Volume 138Issue 7July 2012
Pages: 864 - 876

History

Received: Apr 20, 2011
Accepted: Oct 24, 2011
Published online: Oct 26, 2011
Published in print: Jul 1, 2012

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Sung-Joon Suk [email protected]
Ph.D. Candidate, Univ. of Texas at Austin, Dept. of Civil, Architectural and Environmental Engineering, 1 University Station C1752, Austin, TX 78712 (corresponding author). E-mail: [email protected]
Bon-Gang Hwang [email protected]
Assistant Professor, National Univ. of Singapore, Dept. of Building, SDE2-03-05, 4 Architecture Drive, Singapore 117566. E-mail: [email protected]
Jiukun Dai, M.ASCE [email protected]
Research Engineer, Construction Industry Institute, Benchmarking and Metrics, Univ. of Texas at Austin, 3925 West Braker Lane (R4500), Austin, TX 78759. E-mail: [email protected]
Carlos H. Caldas, M.ASCE [email protected]
Associate Professor, Univ. of Texas at Austin, Dept. of Civil, Architectural and Environmental Engineering, 1 University Station C1752, Austin, TX 78712. E-mail: [email protected]
Stephen P. Mulva, M.ASCE [email protected]
Associate Director, Construction Industry Institute, Benchmarking and Metrics, Univ. of Texas at Austin, 3925 West Braker Lane (R4500), Austin, TX 78759. E-mail: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share