Case Studies
Sep 16, 2011

Contractor Selection Using Multicriteria Decision-Making Methods

Publication: Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Volume 138, Issue 6

Abstract

Contractors play a vital role in the overall performance of a project. Selecting the right contractor for the right project is the most crucial challenge for any construction client. Numerous and often conflicting objectives and alternatives, such as tender price, completion date, and experience, need to be considered. Recently, to assist owners in making decisions, there has been a trend away from a “lowest-price wins” principle and subjective judgement to a multicriteria selection approach in the selection of contractors for construction projects. In the autonomous region of Cantabria, in the north of Spain, increased project complexity and higher requirements have recently demanded the use of multicriteria decision-making methods for contractor selection. With this aim, two multicriteria decision methods, the technique for order preference by similarity to ideal solution (TOPSIS) and vlsekriterijumska optimizacija I kompromisno resenje (VIKOR) methods, are applied to the selection of a contractor for the road building project “La Braguía” undertaken during 2002. The results show that one of the contractors is the highest ranked by both methods. Being the highest ranked alternative by the TOPSIS method indicates that this contractor is the best in terms of the ranking index. In addition, being the highest ranked alternative by the VIKOR method indicates that it is the closest to the ideal solution.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

References

Abidali, A. F., and Harris, F. C. (1995). “A methodology for predicting company failure in the construction industry.” Constr. Manage. Econ.CMECF3, 13(3), 189–196.
Al-Subhi Al-Harbi, K. M. (2001). “Application of the AHP in project management.” Int. J. Proj. Manage.IPMAEL, 19(1), 19–27.
Cheng, E. W. L., and Li, H. (2004). “Contractor selection using the analytical network process.” Constr. Manage. Econ.CMECF3, 22(10), 1021–1032.
Chinyio, E. A., Olomolaiye, P. O., Kometa, S. T., and Harris, F. C. (1998). “A needs-based methodology for classifying construction clients and selecting contractors.” Constr. Manage. Econ.CMECF3, 16(1), 91–98.
El-Sayegh, S. M. (2009). “Multi-criteria decision support model for selecting the appropriate construction management at risk firm.” Constr. Manage. Econ.CMECF3, 27(4), 385–398.
Fong, P. S. W., and Choi, S. K. Y. (2000). “Final contractor selection using the analytical hierarchy process.” Constr. Manage. Econ.CMECF3, 18(5), 547–557.
Hatush, Z., and Skitmore, M. (1997). “Criteria for contractor selection.” Constr. Manage. Econ.CMECF3, 15(1), 19–38.
Hatush, Z., and Skitmore, M. (1998). “Contractor selection using multicriteria utility theory: An additive model.” Build. Environ.BUSCBC, 33(2–3), 105–115.
Holt, G. D. (1998). “Which contractor selection methodology?Int. J. Proj. Manage.IPMAEL, 16(3), 153–164.
Holt, G. D., Olomolaiye, P. O., and Harris, F. C. (1994). “Factors influencing UK construction clients choice of contractor.” Build. Environ.BUSCBC, 29(2), 241–248.
Holt, G. D., Olomolaiye, P. O., and Harris, F. C. (1995). “A review of contractor selection practices in the U.K. construction industry.” Build. Environ.BUSCBC, 30(4), 553–561.
Hwang, C. L., and Yoon, K. (1981). “Multiple attribute decision making.” Lecture notes in economics and mathematical systems 186, Springer-Verlag, Berlin.
Kumaraswamy, M. M. (1996). “Contractor evaluation and selection: A Hong Kong perceptive.” Build. Environ.BUSCBC, 31(3), 273–282.
Lai, K. K., Liu, S. L., and Wang, S. Y. (2004). “A method used for evaluating bids in the Chinese construction industry.” Int. J. Proj. Manage.IPMAEL, 22(3), 193–201.
Lam, K. C., Ng, S. T., Hu, T., Skitmore, M., and Cheung, O. (2000). “Decision support system for contractor prequalfication-artificial neural network model.” Eng. Constr. Archit. Manage., 7(3), 251–266.
Lambopoulos, S. (2007). “The use of time and cost utility for construction contract award under European Union legislation.” Build. Environ.BUSCBC, 42(1), 452–463.
Liu, P., and Wang, M. (2011). “An extended VIKOR method for multiple attribute group decision making based on generalized interval-valued trapezoidal fuzzy numbers.” Sci. Res. EssaysSRECE9, 6(4), 765–776.
Madhi, I., Riley, M., Fereig, S., and Alex, A. (2002). “A multi-criteria approach to contractor selection.” Eng. Constr. Archit. Manage., 9(1), 29–37.
Marzouk, M. (2010). “An application of ELECTRE III to contractor selection.” Construction Research Congress 2010, Ruwanpura, J., Mohamed, Y., and Lee, S., eds., ASCE, Reston, VA.
Moselhi, O., and Martinelli, A. (1990). “Analysis of bids using multiattribute utility theory.” Proc. Int. Symp. on Building Economics and Construction Management, ASCE, Reston, VA, 335–345.
Ng, T. S., and Skitmore, R. M. (1995). “CP-DSS: Decision support system for contractor prequalification.” Civ. Eng. Syst., 12(2), 133–159.
Ng, T. S., Skitmore, R. M., and Smith, N. (1999). “Decision-makers’ perceptions in the formulation of prequalification criteria.” Eng. Constr. Archit. Manage., 6(2), 155–165.
Nguyen, V. U. (1985). “Tender evaluation by fuzzy sets.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage.JCEMD4, 111(3), 231–243.
Opricovic, S., and Tzeng, G. H. (2004). “Compromise solution by MCDM methods: A comparative analysis of VIKOR and TOPSIS.” Eur. J. Oper. Res.EJORDT, 156(2), 445–455.
Padhi, S. S., and Mohapatra, P. K. (2010). “Centralized bid evaluation for awarding of construction projects–A case of Indian government.” Int. J. Proj. Manage.IPMAEL, 28(3), 275–284.
Pasquire, C., and Collins, S. (1996). “The effect of competitive tendering on value in construction.” COBRA’96, Royal Institution of Chartered Surveyors, London.
Pongpeng, J., and Liston, J. (2003). “TenSem: A multicriteria and multidecision-maker’s model in tender evaluation.” Constr. Manage. Econ.CMECF3, 21(1), 21–30.
Rao, R. V. (2008). “A decision making methodology for material selection using an improved compromise ranking method.” Mater. Des.MADSD2, 29(10), 1949–1954.
Russell, J. S., Hancher, D. E., and Skibniewski, M. J. (1992). “Contractor prequalification data for construction owners.” Constr. Manage. Econ.CMECF3, 10(2), 117–135.
Russell, J. S., and Jaselskis, E. J. (1992). “Quantitative study of contractor evaluation programs and their impact.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage.JCEMD4, 118(3), 612–624.
Saaty, T. L. (2000). Fundamentals of decision making and priority theory with AHP, RWS Publications, Pittsburgh.
Singh, D., and Tiong, R. L. K. (2005). “A fuzzy decision framework for contractor selection.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage.JCEMD4, 131(1), 62–70.
Singh, D., and Tiong, R. L. K. (2006). “Contractor selection criteria: Investigations of opinions of Singapore construction practitioners.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage.JCEMD4, 132(9), 998–1008.
Sonmez, M., Yang, J. B., and Holt, G. D. (2001). “Addressing the contractor selection problem using an evident reasoning approach.” Eng. Constr. Archit. Manage., 8(3), 198–210.
Tam, C. M., and Harris, F. C. (1996). “Model for assessing building contractors’ project performance.” Eng. Constr. Archit. Manage., 3(3), 187–203.
Topcu, Y. I. (2004). “A decision model proposal for construction contractor selection in Turkey.” Build. Environ.BUSCBC, 39(4), 469–481.
Waara, F., and Brochner, J. (2006). “Price and nonprice criteria for contractor selection.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage.JCEMD4, 132(8), 797–804.
Wong, C. H. (2004). “Contractor performance prediction model for the United Kingdom construction contractors: Study of logistic regression approach.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage.JCEMD4, 130(5), 691–698.
Wong, C. H., Holt, G. D., and Cooper, P. A. (2000). “Lowest price or value? Investigation of U.K. construction clients’ tender selection process.” Constr. Manage. EconCMECF3, 18(7), 767–774.
Wong, C. H., Holt, G. D., and Harris, P. (2001). “Multicriteria selection or lowest price? Investigation of U.K. construction clients’ tender evaluation preferences.” Eng. Constr. Archit. Manage., 8(4), 257–271.
Zammori, F. A., Braglia, M., and Frosolini, M. (2009). “A fuzzy multi-criteria approach for critical path definition”. Int. J. Proj. Manage.IPMAEL, 27(3), 278–291.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Volume 138Issue 6June 2012
Pages: 751 - 758

History

Received: Oct 26, 2010
Accepted: Sep 14, 2011
Published online: Sep 16, 2011
Published in print: Jun 1, 2012

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

José Ramón San Cristóbal [email protected]
Universidad de Cantabria, Germán Gamazo, 1, Santander, Spain. E-mail: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share