Technical Papers
Sep 3, 2011

Eco-Efficiency of Construction Materials: Data Envelopment Analysis

Publication: Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Volume 138, Issue 6

Abstract

Sustainability assessment tools are critical in the process of achieving sustainable development. Eco-efficiency has emerged as a practical concept that combines environmental and economic performance indicators to measure the sustainability performance of different product alternatives. In this paper, an analytical tool that can be used to assess the eco-efficiency of construction materials is developed. This tool evaluates the eco-efficiency of construction materials by using data envelopment analysis, a linear programming-based mathematical approach. Life-cycle assessment (LCA) and life-cycle cost (LCC) are utilized to derive the eco-efficiency ratios, and data envelopment analysis (DEA) is used to rank material alternatives. Developed mathematical models are assessed by selecting the most eco-efficient exterior wall finish for a building. Percent improvement analysis was carried out to investigate target environmental effect categories that need more reduction to reach 100% eco-efficiency. Through this study, the goal is to show that DEA-based eco-efficiency assessment model could be used to evaluate alternative construction materials and offer vital guidance for decision makers during material selection.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

References

Abbaszadeh, S., Zagreus, L., Lehrer, D., and Huizenga, C. (2006). “Occupant satisfaction with indoor environmental quality in green buildings.” Proc., Healthy Buildings, Center for the Built Environment, Berkeley, CA, 365–370.
ASCE. (2004). Sustainable engineering practice: An introduction, ASCE Committee on Sustainability, Reston, VA.
Augenbroe, G., Pearce, A., Guy, B., and Kibert, C. (2000). “Sustainable construction in the USA: perspectives to the year 2010.” Cities and sustainability: Sustaining our cultural heritage. Proc., Millennium Conference, Univ. of Moratuwa, Sri Lanka, 17–25.
Barba-Gutiérrez, Y., and Adenso-Díaz, B., and Lozano, S. (2009). “Eco-efficiency of electric and electronic appliances: A data envelopment analysis (DEA).” Environ. Model. Assess., 14(4), 439–447.
Bare, J., Norris, G., Pennington, D., and McKone, T. (2002). “The tool for the reduction and assessment of chemical and other environmental impacts.” J. Ind. Ecol.JINEFZ, 6(3–4), 49–78.
BEES Version 4.0 [Computer software]. NIST, Gaithersburg, MD.
Charnes, A., Cooper, W., and Rhodes, E. (1978). “Measuring the efficiency of decision making units.” Eur. J. Oper. Res.EJORDT, 2(6), 429–444.
de Haes, H., Heijungs, R., Suh, S., and Huppes, G. (2004). “Three strategies to overcome the limitations of life-cycle assessment.” J. Ind. Ecol.JINEFZ, 8(3), 19–32.
Doyle, J., and Green, R. (1991). “Comparing products using data envelopment analysis.” OmegaOMEGA6, 19(6), 631–638.
El-Mashaleh, M. (2010). “Decision to bid or not to bid: a data envelopment analysis approach.” Can. J. Civ. Eng.CJCEB8, 37(1), 37–44.
El-Mashaleh, M., Minchin, R. Jr., and O’Brien, W. (2007). “Management of construction firm performance using benchmarking.” J. Manage. Eng.JMENEA, 23(1), 10–17.
Emrouznejad, A., Parker, B., and Tavares, G. (2008). “Evaluation of research in efficiency and productivity: A survey and analysis of the first 30 years of scholarly literature in DEA.” Socio-Econ. Plann. Sci., 42(3), 151–157.
Energy Information Administration (EIA). (2008). “Energy information administration, annual energy outlook.” US Dept. of Energy, 〈http://www.eia.doe.gov/oiaf/aeo/index.html〉 (Jan. 1, 2010).
ENVEST [Computer software]. BRE, UK.
EPA. (2009). “Estimating 2003 building related a construction and demolition material amounts.” Washington, DC.
European Environment Agency (EEA). (1999). Environment in the EU at the turn of the century, EEA, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Fare, R., Grosskopf, S., Lovell, C., and Pasurka, C. (1989). “Multilateral productivity comparisons when some outputs are undesirable: A nonparametric approach.” Rev. Econ. Stat., 71(1), 90–98.
Farrell, M. (1957). “The measurement of productive efficiency.” J. R. Stat. Soc. Ser. A.JSTAAG, 120(3), 253–290.
Gloria, T., Lippiatt, B., and Cooper, J. (2007). “Life cycle impact assessment weights to support environmentally preferable purchasing in the united states.” Environ. Sci. Technol.ESTHAG, 41(21), 7551–7557.
Haselbach, L. (2008). The engineering guide to LEED-new construction: Sustainable construction for engineers, McGraw-Hill Professional, New York.
Horvath, A., and Hendrickson, C. (1998). “Comparison of environmental implications of asphalt and steel-reinforced concrete pavements.” Transportation Research Record 1626, Transportation Research Board, Washington DC, 105–113.
Hua, Z., Bian, Y., and Liang, L. (2007). “Eco-efficiency analysis of paper mills along the Huai River: An extended DEA approach.” OmegaOMEGA6, 35(5), 578–587.
Juan, Y. (2009). “A hybrid approach using data envelopment analysis and case-based reasoning for housing refurbishment contractors selection and performance improvement.” Expert Syst. Appl.ESAPEH, 36(3), 5702–5710.
Keoleian, G., et al. (2005). “Life cycle modeling of concrete bridge design: Comparison of engineered cementitious composite link slabs and conventional steel expansion joints.” J. Infrastruct. Syst.JITSE4, 11(1), 51–60.
Kibert, C. (2008). Sustainable construction: Green building design and delivery, Wiley, Somerset, NJ.
Kicherer, A., Schaltegger, S., Tschochohei, H., and Pozo, B. F. (2007). “Eco-efficiency—Combining life cycle assessment and life cycle costs via normalization.” Int. J. Life Cycle Assess.IJLCFF, 12(7), 537–543.
Korhonen, P., and Luptacik, M. (2004). “Eco-efficiency analysis of power plants: An extension of data envelopment analysis.” Eur. J. Oper. Res.EJORDT, 154(2), 437–446.
Kortelainen, M. (2008). “Dynamic environmental performance analysis: A malmquist index approach.” Ecol. Econ.ECECEM, 64(4), 701–715.
Kuosmanen, T., and Kortelainen, M. (2005). “Measuring eco-efficiency of production with data envelopment analysis.” J. Ind. Ecol.JINEFZ, 9(4), 59–72.
Lacasse, M. A. (1999). “Materials and technology for sustainable construction.” Build. Res. Inf.BREIEA, 27(6), 405–408.
Li, D., Hui, E., Leung, B., Li, Q., and Xu, X. (2010). “A methodology for eco-efficiency evaluation of residential development at city level.” Build. Environ.BUSCBC, 45(3), 566–573.
Lippiatt, B. (2007). “BEES 4.0: Building for environmental and economic sustainability technical manual and user guide.” NIST, Gaithersburg, MD.
Lippiatt, B. C., and Boyles, A. S. (2001). “Using BEES to select cost-effective green products.” Int. J. Life Cycle Assess.IJLCFF, 6(2), 76–80.
McCabe, B., Tran, V., and Ramani, J. (2005). “Construction prequalification using data envelopment analysis.” Can. J. Civ. Eng.CJCEB8, 32(1), 183–193.
Michelsen, O., Fet, A., and Dahlsrud, A. (2006). “Eco-efficiency in extended supply chains: A case study of furniture production.” J. Environ. Manage.JEVMAW, 79(3), 290–297.
National Research Council (NRC). (2009). “Sustainable critical infrastructure systems: A framework for meeting 21st century imperatives.” Toward sustainable critical infrastructure systems: Framing the Challenges Workshop Committee, NRC, Washington, DC.
National Round Table on the Environment and Economy (NRTEE). (2001). Eco-efficiency indicators, a workbook for industry, Renouf Publishing Co Ltd, Canada.
National Science and Techology Council (NSTC). (2008). “Federal R&D agenda for net zero energy, high-performance green buildings.” Committee on Technology, Rep. of the Subcommittee on Buildings Technology Research and Development, Washington, DC.
Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). (1998). “Eco-efficiency.” Paris.
Ozbek, M., Jesús, M., and Triantis, K. (2009). “Data envelopment analysis as a decision making tool for the transportation professionals.” J. Transp. Eng.JTPEDI, 135(11), 822–831.
Papahristodoulou, C. (1997). “A DEA model to evaluate car efficiency.” Appl. Econ.APPEBP, 29(11), 1493–1508.
Pilateris, P., and McCabe, B. (2003). “Contractor financial evaluation model (CFEM).” Can. J. Civ. Eng.CJCEB8, 30(3), 487–499.
President’s Council on Sustainable Development (PCSD). (1999). Toward a sustainable America: Advancing prosperity, opportunity and a healthy environment for the 21st century, DIANE Publishing, Darby, PA.
Saling, P., et al. (2002). “Eco-efficiency analysis by BASF: The method.” Int. J. Life Cycle Assess.IJLCFF, 7(4), 203–218.
Sarkis, J. (2007). “Preparing your data for DEA.” Modeling Data Irregularities and Structural Complexities in Data Envelopment Analysis, 305–320.
Seo, S., and Hwang, Y. (2001). “Estimation of CO2 emissions in life cycle of residential buildings.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage.JCEMD4, 127(5), 414–418.
Stokes, J., and Horvath, A. (2006). “Life cycle energy assessment of alternative water supply systems.” Int. J. Life Cycle Assess.IJLCFF, 11(5), 335–343.
Syrrakou, E., Papaefthimiou, S., and Yianoulis, P. (2006). “Eco-efficiency evaluation of a smart window prototype.” Sci. Total Environ.STENDL, 359(1–3), 267–282.
Takamura, K., Lok, K., and Wittlinger, R. (2002). “Microsurfacing for preventive maintenance: Eco-efficient strategy.” ISSA Annual Meeting, March 2001, Maui, HI.
Talluri, S., and Yoon, P. K. (2000). “A cone-ratio DEA approach for AMT justification.” Int. J. Prod. Econ.IJPEE6, 66(2), 119–129.
World Business Council for Sustainable Development (WBCSD). (2000). “Measuring eco-efficiency.” World Business Council for Sustainable Development.
Xue, X., Shen, Q., Wang, Y., and Lu, J. (2008). “Measuring the productivity of the construction industry in china by using DEA-based malmquist productivity indices.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage.JCEMD4, 134(1), 64–71.
Zhou, P., Ang, B., and Poh, K. (2008). “A survey of data envelopment analysis in energy and environmental studies.” Eur. J. Oper. Res.EJORDT, 189(1), 1–18.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Volume 138Issue 6June 2012
Pages: 733 - 741

History

Received: Feb 15, 2010
Accepted: Sep 1, 2011
Published online: Sep 3, 2011
Published in print: Jun 1, 2012

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Omer Tatari [email protected]
LEED AP, Assistant Professor, Dept. of Civil, Environmental, and Construction Engineering, Univ. of Central Florida, Orlando, FL 32816 (corresponding author). E-mail: [email protected]
Murat Kucukvar
Graduate Research Assistant, Dept. of Civil, Environmental, and Construction Engineering, Univ. of Central Florida, Orlando, FL 32816.

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share