TECHNICAL PAPERS
May 6, 2011

Best Value or Lowest Bid? A Quantitative Perspective

Publication: Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Volume 138, Issue 1

Abstract

In contrast to traditional price-dominated lowest bid (LB) procurements, best value (BV) procurements select contractors most advantageous to the clients, taking into consideration not only prices but also other factors. Decisions on whether LB or BV approach should be adopted are difficult ones. There is yet to be any objective model developed to back up such decisions. This paper proposes an index named price elasticity of performance (PEP) that may serve as a quantitative measure to reach an objective decision. The theoretical model construction of PEP is also described. Two measures in the individual and market levels of PEP are defined. A design/build construction project is selected as a working example to demonstrate the applicability of the proposed method. Potential applications and limitations of the proposed method are also addressed. It is concluded that the proposed PEP method has the potential to resolve the dilemma of pursuing efficiency and avoiding violation of regulations in traditional procurements.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

References

Abdelrahman, M., Zayed, T., and Elyamany, A. (2008). “Best-value model based on project specific characteristics.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 134(3), 179–188.
Akintoye, A., Hardcastle, C., Beck, M., Chinyio, E., and Asenova, D. (2003). “Achieving best value in private finance initiative project procurement.” Constr. Manage. Econ., 21(5), 461–470.
Alsugair, A. M. (1999). “Framework for evaluating bids of construction contractors.” J. Manage. Eng., 15(2), 72–78.
Benjamin, N. B. H. (1972). “Competitive bidding: The probability of winning.” J. Constr. Div., 98(2), 313–330.
Carr, R. I. (1982). “General bidding model.” J. Constr. Div., 108(4), 639–650.
Case, K. E., and Fair, R. C. (1999). Principles of economics, 5th Ed., Prentice-Hall, New Jersey.
Chamberlin, E. H. (1974). The theory of monopolistic competition: A re-orientation of the theory of value, 8th Ed., Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
Cheng, E. W. L., and Li, H. (2004). “Contractor selection using the analytic network process.” Constr. Manage. Econ., 22(10), 1021–1032.
Clemen, R. T. (1996). Making hard decisions: An introduction to decision analysis, Duxbury, Belmont, CA.
Dixie, J. M. (1974). “Bidding models—The final resolution of a controversy.” J. Constr. Div., 100(3), 265–271.
Dolan, R. J., and Simon, H. (1996). Power pricing how managing price transforms the bottom line, Free, New York.
Feldman, M. (2006). “Best value in publicly funded projects: Contractor selection in two county GOB projects.” Research Rep., Center for Labor Research & Studies, Florida International University, Miami.
Fong, S. W., and Choi, K. Y. (2000). “Final contractor selection using the analytical hierarchy process.” Constr. Manage. Econ., 18(5), 547–557.
Friedman, L. (1956). “Competitive-bidding strategy.” Oper. Res., 4(1), 104–112.
Gale, B. T., and Swire, D. J. (2006). “Customer value accounting for value-based pricing.” J. Prof. Pricing, 3rd Quarter, 30–34.
Gates, M. (1967). “Bidding strategies and probabilities.” J. Constr. Div., 93(CO1), 75–107.
Government Procurement Act (GPA). (2005). “Article 52.” Government procurement act, Public Construction Commission, Executive Yuan, Taiwan.
Gransberg, D. D., and Ellicott, M. A. (1996). “Best value contracting: Breaking the low-bid paradigm.” VE&C.5.1-4, Transactions of AACE Int.
Gransberg, D. D., and Ellicott, M. A. (1997). “Best-value contracting criteria.” Cost Eng., 39(6), 31–34.
Holt, G. D. (1998). “Which contractor selection methodology?” Int. J. Proj. Manage., 16(3), 153–164.
Holt, G. D., Olomolaiye, P. O., and Harris, F. C. (1994). “Applying multi-attribute analysis to contractor selection decisions.” Eur. J. Purch. Supply Manage., 1(3), 139–148.
Lambropoulos, S. (2007). “The use of time and cost utility for construction contract award under European Union Legislation.” Build. Environ., 42(1), 452–463.
Lin, C. C., Wang, W. C., and Yu, W. D. (2008). “Improving multiple criteria decision-making in construction via an adaptive AHP approach ( A3 ).” Autom. Constr., 17(2), 180–187.
Ministry of Justice. (2009). “Analysis of BV application in the county government procurement projects.” Special Rep. of Government Ethics, Ministry of Justice Taiwan, Meeting 133, 〈http://www.moj.gov.tw/public/Data/6616141146181.doc〉 (Nov. 2009).
Perng, Y. H., Juan, Y. K., and Chien, S. F. (2006). “Exploring the bidding situation for economically most advantageous tender projects using a bidding game.” Constr. Manage. Econ., 132(10), 1037–1042.
Scherer, F. M., and Ross, D. (1991). Industrial market structure and economic performance, Houghton Mifflin, Boston.
Sheffrin, S. M. (2003). Economics: Principles in action, Pearson Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ.
Skitmore, M. (2002). “Raftery curve construction for tender price forecasts.” Constr. Manage. Econ., 20(1), 83–89.
Skitmore, M., Pettitt, A. N., and McVinish, R. (2007). “Gates’ bidding model.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 133(11), 855–863.
Tsai, H., Wang, L., and Lin, L. A. (2007). “Study on improving the ranking procedure for determining the most advantageous tender.” Constr. Manage. Econ., 25(5), 545–554.
Waara, F., and Bröchner, J. (2006). “Price and nonprice criteria for contractor selection.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 132(8), 797–804.
Wang, K. W., and Yu, W. D. (2007). “Analyzing tender selection using a Geometric Graph Analysis (GGA) approach.” Proc. of the CME 25 Conf., University of Reading, Reading, UK.
Wong, C. H., Holt, G. D., and Cooper, P. A. (2000). “Lowest price or value? Investigation of UK construction clients’ tender selection process.” Constr. Manage. Econ., 18(7), 767–774.
Zhang, X. (2004). “Concessionaire selection: Methods and criteria.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 130(2), 235–244.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Volume 138Issue 1January 2012
Pages: 128 - 134

History

Received: Apr 7, 2010
Accepted: May 4, 2011
Published online: May 6, 2011
Published in print: Jan 1, 2012

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Wen-der Yu, Ph.D. [email protected]
Professor, Institute of Construction Management, Chung Hua Univ., Hsinchu, Taiwan, R.O.C. (corresponding author). E-mail: [email protected]
Kwo-Wuu Wang, Ph.D. [email protected]
Director of Procurement Center, Armaments Bureau, Ministry of National Defense, Taipei, Taiwan, R.O.C. E-mail: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share