TECHNICAL PAPERS
Apr 8, 2011

Identification and Quantification of Non-Value-Adding Effort from Errors and Changes in Design and Construction Projects

Publication: Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Volume 138, Issue 1

Abstract

In a design and construction project, non-value-adding effort (NVAE; also called non-value-adding activities) is wasted effort that could have been avoided if the project had been more carefully planned, executed, monitored, and controlled. NVAE is considered the main contributor to schedule delays and cost overruns in design and construction projects. Microlevel analyses such as work sampling and resource balance charts have been applied extensively to identify and minimize NVAE. These methods can pinpoint unnecessary steps in a highly repetitive construction activity and are most effective when analyzing activities with low performance variation in each cycle. However, microlevel analyses lack the capabilities to deal with errors and changes that usually result in significant performance variations, although they are a major trigger of NVAE in design and construction projects. To address this deficiency, this paper outlines the development of a system dynamics-based model for analysis on a macrolevel. The model’s application to a bridge project in Massachusetts revealed that it can effectively identify and quantify NVAE particularly triggered by errors and changes, and can capture the propagation of NVAE between interrelated activities. On the basis of results, this paper concluded that the developed model can be utilized as a management tool to bring a more comprehensive understanding of NVAE in design and construction projects, which in turn can lead to a greater reduction in NVAE.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Acknowledgments

The writers would like to acknowledge the anonymous reviewers who provided valuable comments on this paper. The writers would also like to acknowledge contributions to this paper by Moonseo Park, Associate Professor at Seoul National Univ., who worked on previous parts of this research project. In addition, we would like to thank those who assisted with data gathering and analysis, including Joe Peck, formerly Corporate Planning and Scheduling Manager and currently an independent consultant; Bill Lemoine, Vice President; John Foster, Senior Project Manager at the Modern Continental Company; Philip Helmes, Vice President; and Margaret Fulenwider, Senior Consultant, formerly at InteCap Inc. and currently at Charles River Associates. Finally, the authors would also like to acknowledge the financial support for this research project received from the National Science Foundation (NSF) CAREER and PECASE Award NSFCMS-9875557, the NSF Award NSFCMS-0324501, the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada’s Discovery Grant RGPIN NSERC355481-08, and the Collaborative Research and Development Grant (UNSPECIFIEDCRDPJ 335345-05). Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this paper are those of the writers and do not necessarily reflect the views of the NSFNSF, NSERCNSERC, or any of the individuals acknowledged in this section.

References

Abdel-Hamid, T. (1984). “The dynamics of software development project management: An integrative system dynamics perspective.” Ph.D. thesis, MIT, Cambridge, MA.
Adrian, J. J., and Boyer, L. T. (1976). “Modeling method productivity.” J. Constr. Div., 102(1), 157–168.
Cooper, K. (1980). “Naval ship production: A claim settled and a framework built.” Interface, 10(6), 20–36.
Eppinger, S. D. (1997). “Three concurrent engineering problems in product development seminar.” Sloan School of Management, MIT, Cambridge, MA.
Ford, D., and Sterman, J. (1998). “Dynamic modeling of product development processes.” Syst. Dyn. Rev., 14(1), 31–68.
Halligan, D. W., Demsetz, L. A., Brown, J. D., and Pace, C. B. (1994). “Action-response model and loss of productivity in construction.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 120(1), 47–64.
Halpin, D. W. (2006). Construction management, Wiley, Hoboken, NJ, 134–137.
Han, S., Lee, S., Golparvar-Fard, M., and Peña-Mora, F. (2007). “Modeling and representation of non-value adding activities due to errors and changes in design and construction projects.” Proc., 2007 Winter Simulation Conf., IEEE, Washington, DC.
Hanna, A. S., Russell, J. S., Gotzion, T. W., and Nordheim, E. V. (1999a). “Impact of change orders on labor efficiency for mechanical construction.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 125(3), 176–184.
Hanna, A. S., Russell, J. S., Nordheim, E. V., and Bruggink, M. J. (1999b). “Impact of change orders on labor efficiency for electrical construction.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 125(4), 224–232.
Hanna, A. S., Taylor, C. S., and Sullivan, K. T. (2005). “Impact of extended overtime on construction labor productivity.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 131(6), 734–739.
Horman, M. J., and Kenley, R. (2005). “Quantifying levels of wasted time in construction with meta-analysis.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 131(1), 52–61.
Howell, G. A. (1999). “What is lean construction-1999.” Proc. 7th Ann. Conf. Int. Group for Lean Constr., International Group for Lean Construction, Berkeley, CA.
Greenberger, M., Crenson, M. A., and Crissey, B. L. (1976). Models in the policy process, Russell Sage Foundation, New York.
Kelleher, A. (2004). “An investigation of the expanding role of the critical path method by ENR’s top 400 contractors.” M.S. thesis, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State Univ., Blacksburg, VA.
Koskela, L. (1992). “Application of the new production philosophy to construction.” Technical Rep. No. 72, Center for Integrated Facility Engineering, Stanford Univ., Palo Alto, CA.
Lee, M., Hanna, A. S., and Loh, W. (2004). “Decision tree approach to classify and quantify cumulative impact of change orders on productivity.” J. Comp. Civ. Eng., 18(2), 132–144.
Lee, S., Han, S., and Peña-Mora, F. (2009). “Integrating construction operation and context in large-scale construction using hybrid computer simulation.” J. Comp. Civ. Eng., 23(2), 75–93.
Lee, S. H., Diekmann, J. E., Songer, A. D., and Brown, H. (1999). “Identifying waste: Application of construction process analysis.” Proc. 7th Ann. Conf. Int. Group for Lean Constr., International Group for Lean Construction, Berkeley, CA, 26–28.
Lee, S., Peña-Mora, F., and Park, M. (2005). “Quality and change management model for large scale concurrent design and construction projects.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 131(8), 890–902.
Lee, S., Peña-Mora, F., and Park, M. (2006). “Reliability and stability buffering approach: Focusing on the issues of errors and changes in concurrent design and construction projects.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 132(5), 452–464.
Levitt, R. E., Thomsen, J., Christiansen, T. R., Kunz, J. C., Jin, Y., and Nass, C. (1999). “Simulating project work processes and organizations: Toward a micro-contingency theory of organizational design.” Manage. Sci., 45(11), 1479–1495.
Lutz, J. D., and Hijazi, A. (1993). “Planning repetitive construction: Current practice.” J. Constr. Manage. Econ., 11(2), 99–110.
Lyneis, J., Cooper, K., and Els, S. (2001). “Strategic management of complex projects: A case study using system dynamics.” Syst. Dyn. Rev., 17(3), 237–260.
Oglesby, C. H., Parker, H. W., and Howell, G. A. (1989). Productivity improvement in construction, Mcgraw-Hill, New York, 211–239.
Park, M., and Peña-Mora, F. (2003). “Dynamic change management for construction: Introducing the change cycle into model-based project management.” Syst. Dyn. Rev., 19(3), 213–242.
Peña-Mora, F., Han, S., Lee, S., and Park, M. (2008). “Strategic-operational construction management: A hybrid system dynamics and discrete event approach.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 134(9), 701–710.
Peña-Mora, F., and Li, M. (2001). “Dynamic planning and control methodology for design/build fast-track construction projects.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 127(1), 1–17.
Richardson, G., and Pugh, A. L. (1981). Introduction to system dynamics modeling with dynamo, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
Rodrigues, A., and Williams, T. (1998). “System dynamics in project management: Assessing the impacts of client behaviour on project performance.” J. Oper. Res. Soc., 49(1), 2–15.
Sagent, R. G. (1998). “Verification and validation of simulation models.” Proc. 1998 Winter Simulation Conf., Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Washington, DC.
Senior, B., and Halpin, D. (1998). “Simplified simulation system for construction projects.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 124(1), 72–81.
Serpell, A., Venturi, A., and Contreras, J. (1995). “Characterization of waste in building construction projects.” Proc. 3rd Ann. Conf. Int. Group for Lean Constr., International Group for Lean Construction, Albuquerque, NM.
Sterman, J. D. (2000). Business dynamics: Systems thinking and modeling for a complex world, McGraw-Hill.
Tavakoli, A., and Riachi, R. (1990). “CPM use in ENR top 400 contractors.” J. Manage. Eng., 6(3), 282–295.
Thomas, H. R., and Yiakounis, I. (1987). “Factor model of construction productivity.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 113(4), 623–639.
Tucker, R. L., Rogge, D. F., Hayes, W. R., and Hendrickson, F. P. (1982). “Implementation of foreman-delay surveys.” J. Constr. Div., 108(4), 577–591.
Williams, T. (2004). “Why Monte Carlo simulations of project networks can mislead.” Proj. Manage. J., 35(3), 53–61.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Volume 138Issue 1January 2012
Pages: 98 - 109

History

Received: Nov 19, 2009
Accepted: Apr 6, 2011
Published online: Apr 8, 2011
Published in print: Jan 1, 2012

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Sangwon Han, M.ASCE [email protected]
Lecturer, Engineering Construction and Management, School of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia (corresponding author). E-mail: [email protected]
SangHyun Lee, M.ASCE [email protected]
Assistant Professor, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109. E-mail: [email protected]
Feniosky Peña-Mora, M.ASCE [email protected]
Professor, Dean of the School of Engineering and Applied Science, Columbia Univ., New York, NY 10027. E-mail: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share