TECHNICAL PAPERS
Mar 31, 2011

Analyzing the Role of National PPP Units in Promoting PPPs: Using New Institutional Economics and a Case Study

Publication: Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Volume 138, Issue 2

Abstract

The global expansion of public-private partnerships (PPPs) has generated interest in establishing national PPP units for implementing or analyzing PPPs. Despite the good intentions for establishing such units, results have been mixed. Unless its role is clarified, a national PPP unit cannot be successful because it lacks adequate authority to respond appropriately to the changing environment. However, relevant research in construction journals is too limited to provide policymakers with constructive suggestions. This study aims to improve this situation by aligning a theoretical model with empirical data. The PPP activities can be analyzed as a game between the host government and private promoters trying to maximize their respective payoffs; thus, in accordance with new institutional economics (NIE) theory, a national PPP unit can be considered an endogenous equilibrium outcome of a game. On the basis of this perspective, three game (four consensus) theoretical models are constructed to find equilibriums: a single game for a single authority, repeated games for a single authority, and repeated games for government with multiple subordinate authorities. This study also uses a case study to present the history of PPPs in Taiwan and the evolutionary role of the National PPP Taskforce, Taiwan. National and international data confirm the theoretical model, which indicates that the common role of a national PPP unit is as a trust-creator between the public and private sectors. This pilot study contributes to the theoretical foundation that policymakers need to accelerate the learning process for implementing a PPP. It also provides researchers in the construction field with an NIE methodology for analyzing other governance structures in the construction field.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

References

Alston, L. J. (1996). “Empirical work in institutional economics: an overview.” Empirical studies in institutional change, L. J. Alston, T. Eggertsson, and D. C. North, eds., Cambridge University Press, New York, 25–30.
Aoki, M. (2001). Toward a comparative institutional analysis, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
Aoki, M. (2008). “Analysing institutional change: Integrating endogenous and exogenous views.” Institutional change and economic behaviour, J. Kornai, L. Mátyás, and G. Roland, eds., Palgrave Macmillan, New York, 113–133.
Brown, A. C., Stern, J., and Tenenbaum, B. (2006). Handbook for evaluating infrastructure regulatory systems, World Bank, Washington, DC.
Chan, A. P. C., Lam, P. T. I., Chan, D. W. M., Cheung, E., and Ke, Y. (2009). “Drivers for adopting public private partnerships: Empirical comparison between China and Hong Kong special administrative region.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 135(11), 1115–1124.
Chang, C. Y., and Ive, G. (2002). “Rethinking the multi-attribute utility approach based procurement route selection technique.” Constr. Manage. Econ., 20(3), 275–284.
Dixit, Avinash K. (1996). The making of economic policy: A transaction-cost politics perspective, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
Dutz, M., Harris, C., Dhingra, I. S., and Shugart, C. (2006). Public-private partnership units: What are they and what do they do? Public policy for the private sector, World Bank, Washington, DC.
Eggertsson, T. (1996). “A note on the economics of institutions.” Empirical studies in institutional change, L. J. Alston, T. Eggertsson, and D. C. North, eds., Cambridge University Press, New York 6–24.
European Commission. (2003). “Guidelines for successful public-private-partnerships.” Directorate-General Regional Policy. 〈http://ec.europa.eu/regional_policy/sources/docgener/guides/ppp_en.pdf〉.
Farrugia, C., Reynolds, T., and Orr, R. J. (2008). “Public-private partnership agencies: A global perspective.” Collaboratory for Research on Global Projects.
Gibbons, R. (1992). A primer in game theory, Harvester, Hemel Hempstead, UK.
Greif, A., Milgrom, P., and Weingast, B. R. (1994). “Coordination, commitment, and enforcement: The case of the merchant guild.” J. Polit. Econ., 102(4), 745–776.
Ho, S. P. (2006). “Model for financial renegotiation in public-private partnership projects and its policy implications: Game theoretic view.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 132(7), 678–688.
Ke, Y., Wang, S. Q., Chan, Albert P. C., and Cheung, E. (2009). “Research trend of public-private partnership in construction journals.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 135(10), 1076–1086.
Lambsdorff, G. J., Taube, M., and Schramm, M. (2005). “Corrupt contracting: Exploring the analytical capacity of new institutional economics and new economic sociology.” The new institutional economics of corruption, G. J. Lambsdorff, M. Taube, and M. Schramm, eds., Routledge, New York, 1–15.
Lee, H., Seo, J., Park, M., Ryu, H., and Kwon, S. (2009). “Transaction-cost-based selection of appropriate general contractor-subcontractor relationship type.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 135(11), 1232–1240.
Mahalingam, A. (2010). “PPP experiences in Indian cities: Barriers, enablers and the way forward.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 136(4), 419–429.
North, D. C. (1990). Institutions, institutional change and economic performance, Cambridge University Press, New York.
Public-Private Infrastructure Advisory Facility (PPIAF). (2007). Public-private partnership units: Lessons for their design and use in infrastructure, World Bank, Washington, DC.
Weingast, B. R. (1995). “The economic role of political institutions: Market-preserving federalism and economic development.” J. Law Econ. Organ., 11(1), 1–31.
Wells, L. T., and Gleason, E. S. (1995). “Is foreign infrastructure investment still risky?” Harv. Bus. Rev., 44–55.
Williamson, O. E. (1985). The economic institutions of capitalism: Firms, markets, relational contracting,.” Free Press, New York.
Williamson, O. E. (1996). The mechanisms of governance, Oxford University Press, New York.
World Bank. (2009). “Private participation in infrastructure database.” 〈http://ppi.worldbank.org/index.aspx〉 (Jan. 10, 2010).
Zheng, S. and Tiong, R. L. K. (2010). “First public-private-partnership application in taiwan’s wastewater treatment sector: A case study of the nanzih bot wastewater treatment project.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., in press.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Volume 138Issue 2February 2012
Pages: 242 - 249

History

Received: Jul 1, 2010
Accepted: Mar 29, 2011
Published online: Mar 31, 2011
Published in print: Feb 1, 2012

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

H. Ping Tserng [email protected]
Professor, Dept. of Civil Engineering, National Taiwan Univ., Taipei 10617, Taiwan (corresponding author). E-mail: [email protected]
Jeffrey S. Russell
Vice Provost for Lifelong Learning; Dean of Continuing Studies; Professor, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of Wisconsin, Madison, WI 53706.
Ching-Wen Hsu
Director, Dept. of Construction Management, Public Construction Commission, Executive Yuan, Taiwan, Republic of China; Ph.D. Candidate, Dept. of Civil Engineering, National Taiwan Univ., Taipei 10617, Taiwan.
Chieh Lin
Senior Specialist, Dept. of Planning, Public Construction Commission, Executive Yuan, Taiwan, Republic of China; Ph.D. Candidate, Dept. of Civil Engineering, National Taiwan Univ., Taipei 10617, Taiwan.

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share