TECHNICAL PAPERS
Mar 16, 2010

Improving Planning Reliability and Project Performance Using the Reliable Commitment Model

Publication: Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Volume 136, Issue 10

Abstract

Commitment planning reliability at an operational level is a key factor for improving project performance. In the last 15 years, the Last Planner System, a production planning and control system based on lean production principles, has improved commitment planning reliability in the construction industry. However, many construction decision makers continue to rely on their experience and intuition when planning their commitments, which hinders their reliability. The reliable commitment model (RCM) is proposed to improve commitment planning reliability at the operational level by using statistical models. RCM is an operational decision-making tool based on lean principles that supports short-term forecasting commitment planning using common-site information such as workers, buffers, and plans. RCM was tested in several case studies, demonstrating its production forecasting capabilities and its ability to help increase commitment planning reliability and improve project performance. RCM also supports workload and labor capacity matching decisions. RCM has the potential of becoming a useful production decision-making tool.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Acknowledgments

The writers gratefully acknowledge the contribution of Felipe González and Sebastián Fuster, who contributed with additional empirical data used in this paper.

References

Alarcón, L. F., Diethelm, S., Rojo, O., and Calderón, R. (2005). “Assessing the impacts of implementing lean construction.” Proc., 13th Annual Conf. of Int. Group for Lean Construction.
Ballard, G. (1993). “Lean construction and EPC performance improvement.” Lean construction, L. F. Alarcón, ed., Balkema, The Netherlands, 79–91.
Ballard, G. (2000). “The last planner system of production control.” Ph.D. dissertation, School of Civil Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, The Univ. of Birmingham, Birmingham, U.K.
Ballard, G., and Howell, G. (1994). “Implementing lean construction: Improving downstream performance.” Lean construction, L. F. Alarcón, ed., Balkema, Rotterdam, The Netherlands, 111–125.
Ballard, G. and Howell, G. (1998). “Shielding production: Essential step in production control.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 124, (1), 11–17.
Ballard, G., and Howell, G. (2003). “An update on last planner.” Proc., 11th Annual Conf. of Int. Group for Lean Construction, Virginia Tech Univ., Blacksburg, Va.
Bustamante, J. A. (2007). Implementing of a rational commitment model for improving planning reliability in construction projects.” M.Eng. thesis, Faculty of Engineering, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago, Chile.
González, V., Alarcón, L. F., Maturana, S., Bustamante, J. A., and Mundaca, F. (2008a). “Work-in-process buffer management using the rational commitment model in repetitive projects.” Proc., 16th Annual Conf. of Int. Group for Lean Construction.
González, V., Alarcón, L. F., and Molenaar, K. (2009). “Multiobjective design of work-in-process buffer for scheduling repetitive building projects.” Autom. Constr., 18(2), 95–108.
González, V., Alarcón, L. F., and Mundaca, F. (2008b). “Investigating the relationship between planning reliability and project performance.” Prod. Plan. Control, 19(5), 461–474.
Huang, T., Kong, C. W., Guo, H. L., Baldwin, A., and Li, H. (2007). “A virtual prototyping system for simulating construction processes.” Autom. Constr., 16(5), 576–585.
Koskela, L. (2000). “An exploration towards a production theory and its application to construction.” Ph.D. dissertation, VTT Building Technology, Helsinki Univ. of Technology, Espoo, Finland.
Laufer, A., Tucker, R. L., Shapira, A., and Shenhar, A. J. (1994). “The multiplicity concept in construction project planning.” Constr. Manage. Econom., 12(1), 53–65.
Liu, M., and Ballard, G. (2008). “Improving labor productivity through production control.” Proc., 16th Annual Conf. of Int. Group for Lean Construction.
Martínez, J. C. (1996). “STROBOSCOPE: State and resource based simulation of construction processes.” Ph.D. dissertation, Univ. of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Mich.
Maturana, S., Alarcón, L. F., Gazmuri, P., and Vrsalovic, M. (2007). “On-site subcontractor evaluation method based on lean principles and partnering practices.” J. Manage. Eng., 23(2), 67–74.
McGray, G. E., Purvis, R. L., and McCray, C. G. (2002). “Project management under uncertainty: The impact of heuristics and biases.” Proj. Manage. J., 33(1), 49–57.
Mundaca, F. (2006). “Variability analysis and planning reliability improvement in construction projects.” M.S. thesis, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Universidad Técnica Federico Santa María, Valparaíso, Chile.
Ramírez, R. R., Alarcón, L. F., and Knights, P. (2004). “Benchmarking system for evaluating management practices in the construction industry.” J. Manage. Eng., 20(3), 110–117.
Sacks, R., and Harel, M. (2006). “An economic game theory model of subcontractor resource allocation behaviour.” Constr. Manage. Econom., 24(8), 869–881.
Seber, G. A. F., and Wild, C. J. (1989). Nonlinear regression, Wiley, New York.
Spetzler, C. S., and Von Holstein, C. S. S. (1975). “Probability encoding in decision analysis.” Manage. Sci., 22(3), 340–358.
Thomas, H. R., and Horman, M. (2006). “Fundamental principles of workforce management.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 132(1), 97–104.
Tommelein, I. D., Riley, D. R., and Howell G. A. (1999). “Parade game: Impact of work flow variability on trade performance.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 125(5), 304–310.
Womack, J. P., and Jones, D. T. (1996). Lean thinking: Banish waste and create wealth in your corporation, Simon & Schuster, New York.
Yin, R. (1994). Case study research, design and methods, Sage, Thousand Oaks, Ca.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Volume 136Issue 10October 2010
Pages: 1129 - 1139

History

Received: Apr 19, 2009
Accepted: Mar 10, 2010
Published online: Mar 16, 2010
Published in print: Oct 2010

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Vicente González [email protected]
Lecturer, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, The University of Auckland, New Zealand, Private Bag 92019, Auckland Mail Centre, Auckland 1142, New Zealand (corresponding author). E-mail: [email protected]
Luis F. Alarcón [email protected]
Professor, Depto. Ing. Gestión de la Construcción, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Casilla 306, Correo 22, Santiago, Chile. E-mail: [email protected]
Sergio Maturana [email protected]
Professor, Depto. Ing. Industrial y de Sistemas, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Casilla 306, Correo 22, Santiago, Chile. E-mail: [email protected]
Fernando Mundaca [email protected]
Well Engineer, Integrated Project Management, Schlumberger. E-mail: [email protected]
José Bustamante [email protected]
Planning and Development Engineer, Socovesa, Santiago, Chile. E-mail: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share