TECHNICAL PAPERS
Sep 15, 2010

Critical Path Segments Scheduling Technique

Publication: Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Volume 136, Issue 10

Abstract

While the critical path method (CPM) has been useful for scheduling construction projects, years of practice and research have highlighted serious drawbacks that hinder its use as a decision support tool. This paper argues that many of CPM drawbacks stem from the rough level of detail at which the analysis is conducted, where activities’ durations are considered as continuous blocks of time. The paper thus proposes a new critical path segments (CPS) mechanism with a finer level of granularity by decomposing the duration of each activity into separate time segments. Three cases are used to prove the benefits of using separate time segments in avoiding complex network relationships, accurately identifying all critical path fluctuation, better allocation of limited resources, avoiding multiple-calendar problems, and accurate analysis of project delays. The paper discusses the proposed CPS mechanism and comments on several issues related to its calculation complexity, its impact on existing procedures, and future extensions. This research is more beneficial to researchers and has the potential to revolutionize scheduling computations to resolve CPM drawbacks.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

References

Al-Gahtani, K. (2009). “Float allocation using the total risk approach.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 135(2), 88–95.
Basu, A. (2008). “Business rules in CPM scheduling software.” AACE Int. Trans., PS.01.1-PS.01.9.
Baweja, S. S. (2006). “CPM schedules—Why and how.” AACE Int. Trans., PS.22.1-PS.22.5.
Chua, D. K. H., and Shen, L. J. (2005). “Key constraint analysis with integrated production scheduler.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 131(7), 753–764.
Fayez, M., Axelsson, P., Oloufa, A., and Hosni, Y. (2003). “DSM versus CPM: Issues for planning design and construction activities.” Proc., Construction Research Congress, Honolulu, ASCE.
Galloway, P. D. (2006). “Survey of the construction industry relative to the use of CPM scheduling for construction projects.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 132(7), 697–711.
Hegazy, T. (2002). Computer-based construction project management, Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River, N.J.
Hegazy, T. (2006). “Simplified project management for construction practitioners.” Cost Engineering J., AACE Int., 48(11), 20–28.
Hegazy, T., and Menesi, W. (2008). “Delay analysis under multiple baseline updates.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 134(8), 575–582.
Hendrickson, C., Zozaya-Gorostiza, C., Rehak, D., Baracco-Miller, E., and Lim, P. (1987). “Expert system for construction planning.” J. Comput. Civ. Eng., 1(4), 253–269.
Herold, S. C. (2004). “Enhanced PDM—Concepts and benefits.” AACE Int. Trans., PS.09.1–PS.09.8.
Ibbs, W., and Nguyen, L. D. (2007). “Schedule analysis under the effect of resource allocation.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 133(2), 131–138.
Kim, D. (2002). “Exploratory study of lean construction: Assessment of lean implementation.” Ph.D. thesis, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Univ. of Texas at Austin, Tex.
Kim, K., and de la Garza, J. M. (2005). “Critical path method with multiple calendars.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 131(3), 330–342.
Korman, R., and Daniels, S. H. (2003). “Critics can’t find the logic in many of today’s CPM schedules; users want software with flexibility, but is it true CPM?” Eng. News-Rec., 250(20), 30–33.
Kuhn, A. J. (2006). “CPM not working well on small projects.” AACE Int. Trans., PS.21.1–PS.21.3.
Liberatore, M. J., Pollack-Johnson, B., and Smith, C. A. (2001). “Project management in construction: Software use and research directions.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 127(2), 101–107.
Livengood, J., and Anderson, M. (2006). “A continuously changing as-planned baseline?” AACE Int. Trans., CDR 08.1–CDR08.8.
Lowsley, S., and Linnett, C. (2006). About time: Delay analysis in construction, RICS Business Services, U.K.
Lu, M., and Lam, H. -C. (2008). “Critical path scheduling under resource calendar constraints.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 134(1), 25–31.
Lu, M., and Lam, H. -C. (2009). “Transform schemes applied on non-finish-to-start logical relationships in project network diagrams.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 135(9), 863–873.
Menesi, W., and Hegazy, T. (2008). “Five needed enhancements to the CPM for construction projects.” Proc., 2008 Annual Canadian Society of Civil Engineers (CSCE) Conf., CSCE, Canada.
Morad, A. A., and Beliveau, Y. J. (1994). “Geometric-based reasoning system for project planning.” J. Comput. Civ. Eng., 8(1), 52–71.
O’Brien, J., and Plotnick, F. (2006). CPM in construction management, McGraw-Hill, New York.
Ostrowski, V. M. (2006). “Construction CPM scheduling-precision without accuracy.” AACE Int. Trans., CDR.S03.1–CDR.S03.4.
Plotnick, F. L. (2006). “RDM—Relationship diagramming method.” AACE Int. Trans., PS.08.1–PS.08.10.
Ponce de Leon, G. (2008). “Project planning using logic diagramming method.” AACE Int. Trans., PS.S05.1–PS.S05.6.
Sawhney, A., Mund, A., and Chaitavatputtiporn, T. (2003). “Petri net-based scheduling of construction projects.” Civ. Eng. Environ. Syst., 20(4), 255–271.
Scavino, N. J. (2003). “Effect of multiple calendars on total float and critical path.” Cost Engineering J., AACE Int., 45(6), 11–15.
Son, J., and Mattila, K. G. (2004). “Binary resource leveling model: Activity splitting allowed.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 130(6), 887–894.
Song, Y., and Chua, D. K. H. (2007). “Temporal logic representation schema for intermediate function.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 133(4), 277–286.
Street, I. A. (2000). “The pitfalls of CPM scheduling on construction projects.” Cost Engineering J., AACE Int., 42(8), 35–37.
Wickwire, J. M., and Ockman, S. (2000). “Industry crisis: Construction scheduling software.” 2000 AACE Int. Trans., CDR.02.1–CDR.02.8.
Winstanley, G., Chacon, M. A., and Levitt, R. E. (1993). “Model-based planning: Scaled-up construction application.” J. Comput. Civ. Eng., 7(2), 199–217.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Volume 136Issue 10October 2010
Pages: 1078 - 1085

History

Received: Mar 2, 2009
Accepted: Mar 2, 2010
Published online: Sep 15, 2010
Published in print: Oct 2010

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Tarek Hegazy, M.ASCE [email protected]
Professor, Civil and Environmental Engineering Dept., Univ. of Waterloo, Waterloo ON, Canada N2L 3G1 (corresponding author). E-mail: [email protected]
Wail Menesi, S.M.ASCE [email protected]
Ph.D. Student, Civil and Environmental Engineering Dept., Univ. of Waterloo, Waterloo ON, Canada N2L 3G1. E-mail: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share