TECHNICAL PAPERS
Feb 26, 2010

Risk Management in the Construction Industry Using Combined Fuzzy FMEA and Fuzzy AHP

Publication: Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Volume 136, Issue 9

Abstract

Failure mode and effect analysis (FMEA) is recognized as one of the most beneficial techniques in reliability programs. FMEA is a structured technique that can help in identifying all failure modes within a system, assessing their impact, and planning for corrective actions. Although this technique has been widely used in many industries, it has some limitations. The purpose of this paper is to extend the application of FMEA to risk management in the construction industry. Fuzzy logic and fuzzy analytical hierarchy process (AHP) are used to address the limitations of traditional FMEA. In essence, this method explores the concept of fuzzy expert systems to map the relationship between impact (I), probability of occurrence (P), and detection/control (D) and the level of criticality of risk events. A case study is presented to validate the concept. The results obtained confirm the capability of fuzzy FMEA and fuzzy AHP to address several drawbacks of the traditional FMEA application. The use of this approach can support the project management team to establish corrective actions in a timely manner.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Acknowledgments

During this study, a great deal of support was received from many people within Enbridge Pipelines. The writers would like to express their appreciation to Mr. Guy Krepps and Mr. Fernando Martinez for all the time, effort, and feedback received during this research. We would also like to thank the entire stakeholder group for their input and valuable feedback. This work was financially supported by the NSERC Associate Industrial Research Chair in Construction Engineering and Management at the University of Alberta under Natural Sciences and Engineering Industrial Research Chair Grant No. NSERCNSERC IRCPJ 349527-05.

References

Ayyub, B. M. (2003). Risk analysis in engineering and economics, Chap. 2, Chapman & Hall/CRC, New York, 33–113.
Bowles, J. B. (2003). “An assessment of RPN prioritization in a failure modes effects and criticality analysis.” Proc., Ann. Reliability and Maintainability Symp., IEEE, Tampa, Fla., 380–386.
Bowles, J. B., and Peláez, C. E. (1995). “Fuzzy logic prioritization of failures in a system failure mode, effects and criticality analysis.” Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf., 50(2), 203–213.
Carbone, T. A., and Tippett, D. D. (2004). “Project risk management using the project risk FMEA.” Eng. Manage. J., 16(4), 28–35.
Dey, P. K. (2003). “Analytic hierarchy process analyzes risk of operating cross-country petroleum pipelines in India.” Nat. Hazards Rev., 4(4), 213–221.
Inform GmbH. (2007). FuzzyTECH user’s manual, Inform Software Corporation, Aachen, Germany.
Justiniano, J. M., and Gopalaswamy, V. (2003). Practical design control implementation, Chap. 8, Interpharm/CRC, New York, 133–154.
Klir, G., and Yuan, B. (1995). Fuzzy sets and fuzzy logic: Theory and applications, Chap. 10, Prentice-Hall PTR, Englewood Cliffs, N.J., 280–301.
Pedrycz, W., and Gomide, F. (2007). Fuzzy systems engineering: Toward human-centric computing, Chap. 4, Wiley, Hoboken, N.J., 67–99.
Pillay, A., and Wang, J. (2003). “Modified failure mode and effects analysis using approximate reasoning.” Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf., 79(1), 69–85.
Project Management Institute (PMI). (2004). A guide to the project management body of knowledge, 3rd Ed., Chap. 11, PMI, Wexford, Pa., 237–268.
Puente, J., Pino, R., Priore, P., and Fuente, D. (2002). “A decision support system for applying failure mode and effects analysis.” Int. J. Qual. Reliab. Manage., 19(2), 137–150.
Rhee, S. J., and Ishii, K. (2003). “Using cost based FMEA to enhance reliability and serviceability.” Adv. Eng. Inform., 17(3–4), 179–188.
Saaty, T. L. (1982). Decision making for leaders: The analytical hierarchy process for decision in a complex world, Chap. 5, Lifetime Learning, Belmont, Calif., 75–92.
Thompson, P., and Perry, J. G. (1992). Engineering construction risks: A guide to project risk analysis and risk management, Thomas Telford, London.
U.S. Department of Defense. (1980). “Military standard—Procedures for performing a failure mode effects and criticality analysis. 2.” MIL-STD-1929A, Washington, D.C.
Xu, K., Tang, L. C., Xie, M., Ho, S. L., and Zhu, M. L. (2002). “Fuzzy assessment of FMEA for engine systems.” Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf., 75(1), 17–29.
Zadeh, L. A. (1965). “Fuzzy sets.” Inf. Control., 8(3), 338–353.
Zeng, J., An, M., and Smith, N. J. (2007). “Application of a fuzzy-based decision making methodology to construction project risk assessment.” Int. J. Proj. Manage., 25(6), 589–600.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Volume 136Issue 9September 2010
Pages: 1028 - 1036

History

Received: Apr 27, 2009
Accepted: Feb 24, 2010
Published online: Feb 26, 2010
Published in print: Sep 2010

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Mohamed Abdelgawad [email protected]
Ph.D. Candidate, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Hole School of Construction Engineering, 3-013 Markin/CNRL, NREF, Univ. of Alberta, Edmonton AB, Canada T6G 2W2. E-mail: [email protected]
Aminah Robinson Fayek, A.M.ASCE [email protected]
Professor, NSERC Associate Industrial Research Chair, and Ledcor Professor in Construction Engineering, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of Alberta, Edmonton AB, Canada T6G 2W2 (corresponding author). E-mail: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share