Employing the Net Present Value-Consistent IRR Methods for PFI Contracts
This article has a reply.
VIEW THE REPLYThis article has a reply.
VIEW THE REPLYPublication: Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Volume 136, Issue 7
Abstract
The internal rate of return (IRR) is a common financial indicator for private finance initiative (PFI) projects. Due to the long and complicated cash flow nature of PFI projects, more plausible IRR techniques are necessary for appropriate project evaluation and ranking. However, not all the published articles researching on IRR techniques are reliable. Given the importance of computing the profitability of PFI projects, this paper is intended to introduce three reliable IRR methods, which are proven to be consistent with net present value. Examples are used to illustrate their utility. The paper is of high value as it guides industry’s practitioners to use proper IRR methods for selecting PFI projects. It also provides academic researchers a platform to explore more robust methods.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
Acknowledgments
This study was jointly funded by grants from the Hong Kong Polytechnic University (Project No. UNSPECIFIEDA-PF57) and the Research Grants Council of Hong Kong Special Administrative Region (RGC Reference PolyU No. UNSPECIFIED5144/06E). The writers would like to thank anonymous reviewers for their useful comments on earlier versions of the paper.
References
Fisher, I. (1930). The theory of interest, Macmillan, New York.
Hajdasinski, M. M. (2004). “The internal rate of return (IRR) as a financial indicator.” Eng. Econ., 49(2), 185–197.
Hartman, J. C., and Schafrick, I. C. (2004). “The relevant internal rate of return.” Eng. Econ., 49(2), 139–158.
Hazen, G. B. (2003). “A new perspective on multiple rate of return.” Eng. Econ., 48(1), 31–51.
HM Treasury (HMT). (2004). “Standardization of PFI contracts.” HMSO, Norwich.
Housing, Planning and Lands Bureau (HPLB). (2007). Invitation for Proposals: Development of West Kowloon Cultural District, Housing, Planning and Lands Bureau, The Government of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, Hong Kong.
Hwee, N. G., and Tiong, R. L. K. (2002). “Model on cash flow forecasting and risk analysis for contracting firms.” Int. J. Proj. Manage., 20, 351–363.
Kelleher, J. C., and MacCormack, J. J. (2004). “Internal rate of return: A cautionary tale.” The McKinsey Quarterly, ⟨http://www.cfo.com/printable/article.cfm/3304945?f=options⟩ (Oct. 20, 2004).
Kennedy, W. F., and Plath, D. A. (1994). “A return-based alternative to IRR evaluations.” Healthcare Financ. Manage., 48(3), 38–49.
Lin, S. A. Y. (1976). “The modified internal rate of return and investment criterion.” Eng. Econ., 21(4), 237–247.
Louderback, J. G., and McNichols, C. W. (1986). “A note on net present value and internal rate of return functions in electronic spreadsheets.” J. Account. Educ., 4(2), 113–116.
McDaniel, W. R., McCarty, D. E., and Jessell, K. A. (1988). “Discounted cash flow with explicit reinvestment rates: Tutorial and extension.” The Financial Rev., 23(3), 369–385.
Office of Government Commerce (OGC). (2002). OGC Guidance on Certain Financing Issues in PFI Contracts, Private Finance Unit, Office of Government Commerce, July 31.
Shull, D. M. (1992). “Efficient capital project selection through a yield-based capital budgeting technique.” Eng. Econ., 38(1), 1–18.
Zhang, D. (2005). “A different perspective on using multiple internal rates of return: The IRR parity technique.” Eng. Econ., 50(4), 327–335.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
© 2010 ASCE.
History
Received: Jul 11, 2009
Accepted: Dec 14, 2009
Published online: Dec 16, 2009
Published in print: Jul 2010
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.