Qualitative Research: Application of the Delphi Method to CEM Research
Publication: Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Volume 136, Issue 1
Abstract
Construction engineering and management (CEM) researchers often rely on alternative research techniques when traditional methods fail. For example, surveys, interviews, and group-brainstorming techniques may not be appropriate for research that involves confounding factors and requires access to sensitive data. In such an environment, the Delphi technique allows researchers to obtain highly reliable data from certified experts through the use of strategically designed surveys. At present, the Delphi method has not seen widespread use in CEM research. This is likely due to variation among studies that implement Delphi in CEM research and ambiguity in literature that provides guidance for the specific parameters associated with the method. Using the guidance in this paper, the reader may: (1) understand the merits, appropriate application, and appropriate procedure of the traditional Delphi process; (2) identify and qualify potential expert panelists according to objective guidelines; (3) select the appropriate parameters of the study such as the number of panelists, number of rounds, type of feedback, and measure of consensus; (4) identify potential biases that may negatively impact the quality of the results; and (5) appropriately structure the surveys and conduct the process in such a way that bias is minimized or eliminated.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
Arditi, D., and Gunaydin, H. M. (1999). “Perceptions of process quality in building projects.” J. Manage. Eng., 15(2), 43–53.
Baron, J. (2003). Myside bias in thinking about abortion, University of Pennsylvania Press, Philadelphia.
Best, R. J. (1974). “An experiment in Delphi estimation in marketing decision making.” J. Mark. Res., 11(1), 448–452.
Bjarnason, T., and Jonsson, S. H. (2005). “Contrast effects in perceived risk of substance use.” Subst Use Misuse, 40(1), 1733–1748.
Boje, D. M., and Murnighan, J. K. (1982). “Group confidence pressures decisions.” Manage. Sci., 28(1), 1187–1196.
Brockhoff, K. (1975). “The performance of forecasting groups in computer dialogue and face-to-face discussion.” The Delphi method: Techniques and applications, Addison-Wesley, Reading, Mass., 291–321.
Dalkey, N., Brown, B., and Cochran, S. (1970). “Use of self-ratings to improve group estimates.” Technological Forecasting, 1(3), 283–291.
de la Cruz, M., del Caño, A., and de la Cruz, E. (2006). “Downside risks in construction projects developed by the civil service: The case of Spain.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 132(8), 844–852.
del Caño, A., and de la Cruz, M. (2002). “Integrated methodology for project risk management.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 128(6), 473–485.
Durkheim, E. (1982). The rules of the sociological method, Free Press, New York.
Erffmeyer, R. C., and Lane, I. M. (1984). “Quality and acceptance of an evaluative task: The effects of four group decision-making formats.” Group Organiz. Stud., 9(4), 509–529.
Gunhan, S., and Arditi, D. (2005a). “Factors affecting international construction.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 31(3), 273–282.
Gunhan, S., and Arditi, D. (2005b). “International expansion decision for construction companies.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 131(8), 928–937.
Gupta, U. G., and Clarke, R. E. (1996). “Theory and applications of the Delphi technique: A bibliography (1975–1994).” Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change, 53(2), 185–211.
Hallowell, M. (2008). “A formal model of construction safety and health risk management.” Ph.D. dissertation, Oregon State Univ., Corvallis, Ore.
Heath, L., and Tindale, R. S. (1994). Applications of heuristics and biases to social issues, Plenum, New York.
Hyun, C., Cho, K., Koo, K., Hong, T., and Moon, H. (2008). “Effect of delivery methods on design performance in multifamily housing projects.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 134(7), 468–482.
Krimsky, S., and Golding, D. (1992). Social theories of risk, Praeger, London.
Linstone, H. A., and Turoff, M. (1975). The Delphi method: Techniques and applications, Addison-Wesley, Reading, Mass.
Martin, W. (2006). Theories of judgment, University Press, New York.
Perkins, D. N. (1989). “Reasoning as it is and could be: An empirical perspective.” Thinking across Cultures: 3rd International Conf. on Thinking, Erlbaum, Hillsdale, N.J.
Pill, J. (1971). “The Delphi method: Substance, context, a critique and annotated bibliography.” Socio-Econ. Plan. Sci., 5(1), 55–71.
Restorff, H. V. (1933). “Über die Wirkung von Bereichsbildungen im Spurenfeld.” Psychol. Forsch., 18, 299–334.
Robinson, J. (1991). “Delphi methodology for economic impact assessment.” J. Transp. Eng., 117(3), 335–348.
Rogers, M. R., and Lopez, E. C. (2002). “Identifying critical crosscultural school psychology competencies.” J. Soc. Psychol., 40(2), 115–141.
Rottenstreich, Y., and Hsee, C. K. (2001). “Money, kisses, and electric shocks: On the affective psychology of risk.” Psychol. Sci., 12, 185–190.
Rowe, G., and Wright, G. (1999). “The Delphi technique as a forecasting tool: Issue and analysis.” Int. J. Forecast., 15, 353–375.
Veltri, A. T. (1985). “Expected use of management principles for safety function management.” Ph.D. dissertation, West Virginia Univ., Morgantown, W.Va.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Volume 136 • Issue 1 • January 2010
Pages: 99 - 107
Copyright
© 2010 ASCE.
History
Received: Jul 21, 2008
Accepted: Mar 27, 2009
Published online: Aug 22, 2009
Published in print: Jan 2010
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.