Personal Construct-Based Factors Affecting Interpersonal Trust in a Project Design Team
Publication: Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Volume 136, Issue 2
Abstract
Interpersonal trust is an important factor affecting the performance of the design team in a construction project. To improve the team’s performance, factors affecting interpersonal trust need to be identified thereby increasing trust between team members. A questionnaire survey of architects in project design teams is conducted in Beijing, Shanghai, and Qingdao, People’s Republic of China. Based on the personal construct theory, the survey collects personal construct-based factors which may affect interpersonal trust. Then the factors are tested using structural equation modeling method. Two significant factors i.e., “social interaction” and “attitude on work” are identified. The results suggest that team managers should enhance the social interactions between team members and provide guidance to team members about the correct attitude on work such that the level of interpersonal trust can be improved.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
Barber, B. (1983). The logic and limit of trust, Rutgers University Press, Brunswick, N.J.
Boyle, R., and Bonacich, P. (1970). “The development of trust and mistrust in mixed-motive games.” Sociometry, 33(2), 123–139.
Cohen, S. G., Ledford, G. E., and Spreitzer, G. M. (1996). “A predictive model of self-managing work team effectiveness.” Hum. Relat., 49(5), 643–676.
Cook, J., and Wall, T. (1980). “New work attitude measures of trust, organizational commitment and personal need non-fulfillment.” J. Occup. Psychol., 53, 39–52.
Dasgupta, P. (1988). “Trust as a commodity.” Trust: Making and breaking cooperative relations, D. Gambetta, ed., Blackwell Publisher, New York, N.Y.
Dillman, D. A. (2000). Mail and internet surveys: The tailored design method, 2nd Ed., Wiley, New York.
Ding, Z. K., and Ng, F. F. (2007). “Reliability and validity of the chinese version of McAllister’s trust scale.” Construct. Manag. Econ., 25(11), 1107–1117.
Ding, Z. K., Ng, F. F., and Cai, Q. Y. (2007). “Personal constructs affecting interpersonal trust and willingness to share knowledge between architects in project design teams.” Construct. Manag. Econ., 25(9), 937–950.
Dunphy, D., and Bryant, B. (1996). “Teams: Panaceas or prescriptions for improved performance?” Hum. Relat., 49(5), 677–699.
Farris, G. F., Senner, E. E., and Butterfield, D. A. (1973). “Trust, culture, and organizational behavior.” Ind. Labor Relat. Rev., 12(2), 144–157.
Fong, P. S. W., and Lung, B. W. C. (2007). “Interorganizational teamwork in the construction industry.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 133(2), 157–168.
Frost, T., Stimpson, D. V., and Maughan, M. R. C. (1978). “Some correlates of trust.” J. Psychol., 99(1), 103–108.
Good, D. (1988). “Individuals, interpersonal relations, and trust.” Trust: Making and breaking cooperative relations, D. Gambetta, ed., Blackwell Publishers, New York, 31–48.
Henry, G. T. (1990). “Practical sampling.” Applied social research methods series, 21, Sage Publications, Inc., Newbury Park, Calif.
Jin, X. H., and Ling, F. Y. Y. (2005). “Model for fostering trust and building relationships in China's construction industry.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 131(11), 1224–1232.
Johnson-George, C., and Swap, W. C. (1982). “Measurement of specific interpersonal trust: construction and validation of a scale to assess trust in a specific other.” J. Pers. Soc. Psychol., 43(6), 1306–1317.
Jones, G. R., and George, J. M. (1998). “The experience and evolution of trust: implications for cooperation and teamwork.” Acad. Manage. Rev., 23(3), 531–546.
Kalton, G. (1983). Introduction to survey sampling, Sage, Calif.
Kee, H. W., and Knox, R. E. (1970). “Conceptual and methodological considerations in the study of trust and suspicion.” J. Conflict Resolut., 14(3), 357–366.
Kelly, G. A. (1991). The psychology of personal constructs, Norton, New York.
Kline, R. B. (2005). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling, 2nd Ed., The Guilford Press, New York.
Larzelere, R., and Huston, T. (1980). “The dyadic trust scale: Toward understanding interpersonal trust in close relationships.” J. Marriage Fam., 42(3), 595–604.
Lawson, B. (2004). What designers know, Architectural Press, Oxford.
Lawson, B. (2006). How designers think, 4th Ed., Architectural Press, Oxford.
Luhmann, N. (1979). Trust and power, Wiley, New York.
Maruyama, G. M. (1998). Basics of structural equation modeling, Sage Publications, Inc., Calif.
McAllister, D. J. (1995). “Affect-and cognition-based trust as foundations for interpersonal cooperation in organizations.” Acad. Manage. J., 38(1), 24–59.
Osgood, C. E., Suci, G. J., and Tannenbaum, P. H. (1957). The measurement of meaning, University of Illionis Press.
Peng, S. Q. (1998). “Guanxi in trust: An indigenous study of chinese interpersonal trust.” Ph.D. thesis, The Univ. of Hong Kong, Hong Kong.
Pratkanis, A. R. (1989). Attitude structure and function, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
Ring, P. S., and Van de Ven, A. (1992). “Structuring cooperative relationships between organizations.” Strategic Manage. J., 13, 483–498.
Sako, M. (1992). Prices, quality and trust: Inter-firm relations in Britain and Japan, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
SAS Support. (2006). “Macro to test multivariate normality.” ⟨http://support.sas.com/kb/24/983.html⟩ (Jun 4, 2008).
Sitkin, S. B., and Roth, N. L. (1993). “Explaining the limited effectiveness of legalistic “remedies” for trust/distrust.” Org. Sci, 4(3), 367–392.
Srivastave, A. (2001). “Antecedents and effects of knowledge sharing in teams: A field study.” Ph.D. thesis, Univ. of Maryland, College Park, Ma.
Stewart, V., Stewart, A., and Fonda, N. (1981). Business applications of repertory grid, McGraw-Hill, New York.
Wang, L., Fan, X. T., and Willson, V. L. (1996). “Effects of nonnormal data on parameter estimates and fit indices for a model with latent and manifest variables: An empirical study.” Struct. Equation Model., 3(3), 228–247.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
© 2010 ASCE.
History
Received: Jun 4, 2008
Accepted: Jul 17, 2009
Published online: Jul 18, 2009
Published in print: Feb 2010
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.