Contextualist Research: Iterating between Methods While Following an Empirically Grounded Approach
Publication: Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Volume 136, Issue 1
Abstract
An alternative approach to research is described that has been developed through a succession of significant construction management research projects. The approach follows the principles of iterative grounded theory, whereby researchers iterate between alternative theoretical frameworks and emergent empirical data. Of particular importance is an orientation toward mixing methods, thereby overcoming the existing tendency to dichotomize quantitative and qualitative approaches. The approach is positioned against the existing contested literature on grounded theory, and the possibility of engaging with empirical data in a “theory free” manner is discounted. Emphasis instead is given to the way in which researchers must be theoretically sensitive as a result of being steeped in relevant literatures. Knowledge of existing literatures therefore shapes the initial research design; but emergent empirical findings cause fresh theoretical perspectives to be mobilized. The advocated approach is further aligned with notions of knowledge coproduction and the underlying principles of contextualist research. It is this unique combination of ideas which characterizes the paper's contribution to the research methodology literature within the field of construction management. Examples are provided and consideration is given to the extent to which the emergent findings are generalizable beyond the specific context from which they are derived.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
Abrahamson, E. (1996). “Management fashion.” Acad. Manage. Rev., 21(1), 254–285.
Ballard, G., and Howell, G. (1998). “Shielding production: An essential step in production control.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 124(1), 11–17.
Barney, J. (1991). “Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage.” J. Manage., 17(1), 99–120.
Benders, J., and Van Bijsterveld, M. (2000). “Leaning on lean: The reception of a management fashion in Germany.” N. Technol. Work Employ., 15(1), 50–64.
Bresnen, M., and Marshall, N. (2001). “Understanding the diffusion and application of new management ideas in construction.” Eng., Constr., Archit. Manage., 8(5/6), 335–345.
Brown, J. S., and Duguid, P. (1991). “Organizational learning and communities of practice: Toward a unified view of working, learning, and innovation.” Org. Sci., 2(1), 40–57.
Chia, R. (1995). “From modern to postmodern organisational analysis.” Organ. Stud., 16(4), 579–604.
Cox, R. F., Issa, R. R. A., and Ahrens, D. (2003). “Management’s perception of key performance indicators for construction.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 129(2), 142–151.
Cully, M., Woodland, S., O’Reilly, A., and Dix, G. (1999). Britain at work, Routledge, London.
Dainty, A. R. J., Bagilhole, B. M., and Neale, R. H. (2000a). “Computer aided analysis of qualitative data in construction management research.” Build. Res. Inf., 28(4), 226–233.
Dainty, A. R. J., Bagilhole, B. M., and Neale, R. H. (2000b). “A grounded theory of women’s career underachievement in large UK construction companies.” Constr. Manage. Econom., 18(2), 239–250.
Dervin, B. (1992). “From the mind’s eye of the user: The sense-making qualitative-quantitative methodology.” Qualitative research in information management, J. Glazier and R. Powell, eds., Libraries Unlimited, Englewood, Colo., 61–84.
Dohse, K., Jurgens, U., and Malsch, T. (1985). “From Fordism to Toyotism? The social organization of the labour process in the Japanese automobile industry.” Polit. Soc., 14(2), 115–146.
Easterby-Smith, M., Thorpe, R., and Lowe, A. (1991). Management research: An introduction, SAGE, London.
Egan, J. (1998). Rethinking construction: Department of the Environment, Transport and the Regions, DETR, London.
Fernie, S., Leiringer, R., and Thorpe, T. (2006). “Change in construction: A critical perspective.” Build. Res. Inf., 34(2), 91–103.
Fox, P., and Skitmore, M. (2007). “Factors facilitating construction industry development.” Build. Res. Inf., 35(2), 178–188.
Garrahan, P., and Stewart, P. (1992). The Nissan enigma: Flexibility at work in a local economy, Mansell, London.
Gibbons, M., Limoges, C., Nowotony, H., Schwartzman, S., Scott, P., and Trow, M. (1994). The new production of knowledge: The dynamics of science and research in contemporary societies, Sage, London.
Glaser, B. G., and Strauss, A. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research, Aldine, New York.
Green, S. D., Harty, C. F., Elmualim, A. A., Larsen, G., and Kao, C. C. (2008a). “On the discourse of construction competitiveness.” Build. Res. Inf., 36(5), 426–435.
Green, S. D., Larsen, G. D., and Kao, C. C. (2008b). “Competitive strategy revisited: Contested concepts and dynamic capabilities.” Constr. Manage. Econom., 26(1), 63–78.
Green, S. D., and May, S. C. (2005). “Lean construction: Arenas of enactment, models of diffusion and the meaning of ‘leanness’.” Build. Res. Inf., 33(6), 498–511.
Green, S. D., and Schweber, L. (2008). “Theorising in the context of professional practice: The case for middle range theories.” Build. Res. Inf., 36(6), 649–654.
Greene, J. C. (1994). “Qualitative program evaluation: Practice and promise.” Handbook of qualitative research, N. K. Denzin and Y. S. Lincoln, eds., SAGE, London, 530–544.
Hendry, J. (2000). “Strategic decision making, discourse, and strategy as social practice.” J. Manage. Stud. (Oxford), 37(7), 955–977.
Hillebrandt, P. M., and Cannon, J. (1990). The modern construction firm, Macmillan, London.
Hillebrandt, P. M., Cannon, J., and Lansley, P. (1995). The construction company in and out of recession, Macmillan, Basingstoke, U.K.
International Labour Office (ILO). (2001). The construction industry in the twenty-first century: Its image, employment prospects and skill requirements, ILO, Geneva, Switzerland.
Jarzabkowski, P. (2005). Strategy as practice—An activity-based approach, SAGE, London.
Kinnie, N., Hutchinson, S., and Purcell, J. (1996). “The people implications of leaner ways of working.” Rep. No. 15, Institute of Personnel Management, London, 6–63.
Lansley, P. (1987). “Corporate strategy and survival in the UK construction industry.” Constr. Manage. Econom., 5(2), 141–155.
Larsen, G. D., Kao, C. C., and Green, S. D. (2008). “Partnering in flight: From being to becoming.” J. Constr. Procure., 14(1), 35–50.
Lincoln, Y. S., and Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry, Sage, Newbury Park, Calif.
MacLean, D., and MacIntosh, R. (2002). “One process, two audiences: On the challenges of management research.” Eur. Manage. J., 20(4), 383–392.
Maskell, P., Eskelinen, H., Hannibalsson, I., Malmberg, A., and Vatne, E. (1998). Competitiveness, localised learning and regional development, Routledge, London.
Orton, J. D. (1997). “From inductive to iterative grounded theory: Zipping the gap between process theory and process data.” Scand. J. Manage., 13(4), 419–439.
Perkmann, M., and Walsh, K. (2007). “University-industry relationships and open innovation: Towards a research agenda.” Int. J. Manag. Rev., 9(4), 259–280.
Pettigrew, A. M. (1997). “What is a processual analysis?” Scand. J. Manage., 13(4), 337–348.
Pettigrew, A. M. (2003). “Strategy as process, power, and change.” Images of strategy, S. Cummings and D. Wilson, eds, Blackwell, Oxford, U.K., 301–330.
Pettigrew, A. M., and Whipp, R. (1991). Managing change for competitive success, Blackwell, Oxford, U.K.
Porter, M. E. (1985). Competitive advantage, Free Press, New York.
Rooke, J. (1997). “Developing a more empirical approach to culture, attitude, and motivation in construction management research: A critique and a proposal.” J. Constr. Procure., 3(2), 45–55.
Rooke, J., and Kagioglou, M. (2007). “Criteria for evaluating research: The unique adequacy requirement of methods.” Constr. Manage. Econom., 25(9), 979–987.
Runeson, G. (1997). “The role of theory in construction management research.” Constr. Manage. Econom., 15(3), 299–302.
Seymour, D., Crook, D., and Rooke, J. (1997). “The role of theory in construction management: A call for debate.” Constr. Manage. Econom., 15(1), 117–119.
Seymour, D., and Rooke, J. (1995). “The culture of the industry and the culture of research.” Constr. Manage. Econom., 13(6), 511–523.
Strauss, A., and Corbin, J. (1994). “Grounded theory methodology: An overview.” Handbook of qualitative research, N. Denzin and Y. Lincoln, eds., Sage, Thousand Oaks, Calif.
Suddaby, R. (2006). “What grounded theory is not.” Acad. Manage J., 49(4), 633–642.
Teece, D. J., Pisano, G., and Shuen, A. (1997). “Dynamic capabilities and strategic management.” Strategic Manage. J., 18(7), 509–533.
Thomas, H. R., Sanders, S. R., and Bilal, S. (1992). “Comparison of labour productivity.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 118(4), 635–650.
Uzzi, B. (1996). “The sources and consequences of embeddedness for the economic performance of organizations: The network effect.” Am. Sociol. Rev., 61(4), 674–698.
Van Aken, J. E. (2004). “Management research based on the paradigm of the design sciences: The quest for field-tested and grounded technological rules.” J. Manage. Stud. (Oxford), 41(2), 219–246.
Walsh, K. D., Sawhney, A., and Brown, A. (2005). “International comparison of cost for the construction sector: Purchasing power parity.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 131(2), 160–167.
Weick, K. E. (1995). Sensemaking in organizations, SAGE, Thousand Oaks, Calif.
Womack, J. P., and Jones, D. T. (1996). Lean thinking, Simon and Schuster, New York.
Womack, J. P., Jones, D. T., and Roos, D. (1990). The machine that changed the world, Rawson Associates, New York.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Volume 136 • Issue 1 • January 2010
Pages: 117 - 126
Copyright
© 2010 ASCE.
History
Received: Sep 1, 2008
Accepted: Jan 21, 2009
Published online: Mar 27, 2009
Published in print: Jan 2010
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.