Mixed Method Research: Fundamental Issues of Design, Validity, and Reliability in Construction Research
Publication: Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Volume 136, Issue 1
Abstract
The fact that people play key roles in nearly all aspects of construction suggests that effective construction research requires proper application of social science research methods. This is particularly true for researchers studying topics that involve human actions or behavior in construction processes, such as leadership, innovation, and planning. In social science research, no single method of data collection (survey, experiment, participant observation, or unobtrusive research) is ideal. Each method has inherent strengths and weaknesses. Careful attention to the methodological ABCs of the design process, as discussed here, can enhance the validity and reliability of a given study. Combining quantitative and qualitative approaches in research design and data collection, however, should be considered whenever possible. Such mixed-methods research is more expensive than a single method approach, in terms of time, money, and energy, but improves the validity and reliability of the resulting data and strengthens causal inferences by providing the opportunity to observe data convergence or divergence in hypothesis testing.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
Babbie, E. (2008). The basics of social research, Thomson Wadsworth, Belmont, Calif.
Belsley, D. A., Kuh, E., and Welsch, R. E. (1980). Regression diagnostics, Wiley, New York.
Brewer, J., and Hunter, A. (1989). Multimethod research: A synthesis of styles, Sage, Newbury Park, Calif.
Campbell, D. T., and Fiske, D. W. (1959). “Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix.” Psychol. Bull., 56(2), 81–105.
Campbell, D. T., and Stanley, J. (1963). Experimental and quasi-experimental design for research, Rand McNally, Chicago.
Chambliss, D., and Schutt, R. K. (2006). Making sense of the social world: Methods of investigation, Pine Forge, Thousand Oaks, Calif.
Cook, T. D., and Campbell, D. T. (1979). Quasi-experimentation: Design & analysis issues for field settings, Houghton Mifflin, Boston.
Denzin, N. K. (1989). The research act: A theoretical introduction to sociological methods, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, N.J.
El-Diraby, T. E., and O’Connor, J. T. (2004). “Lessons learned in designing research methodology in field-based construction research.” J. Profl. Issues Eng. Educ. Pract., 130(2), 109–114.
Fellows, R., and Liu, A. (2008). Research methods for construction, 3rd Ed., Blackwell Science, Oxford, U.K.
Judd, C. M., Smith, E. R., and Kidder, L. H. (1991). Research methods in social relations, 6th Ed., Holt, Rinehart, and Winston, New York.
Loehlin, J. C. (1998). Latent variable models: An introduction to factor, path, and structural analysis, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, London.
Loosemore, M. (1999). “International construction management research: Cultural sensitivity in methodological design.” Constr. Manage. Econom., 17(5), 553–561.
Molenaar, K., Washington, S., and Diekmann, J. (2000). “A structural equation model of construction contract dispute potential.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 126(4), 268–277.
Neuman, W. L. (2000). Social research methods: Qualitative and quantitative approaches, Allyn and Bacon, Needham Heights, Mass.
Raftery, J., McGeorge, D., and Walter, M. (1997). “Breaking up methodological monopolies: A multi-paradigm approach to construction management research.” Constr. Manage. Econom., 15(3), 291–297.
Runeson, G. (1997). “The role of theory in construction management research: Comment.” Constr. Manage. Econom., 15(3), 299–302.
Seymour, D., Crook, D., and Rooke, J. (1997). “The role of theory in construction management: A call for debate.” Constr. Manage. Econom., 15(1), 117–119.
Vogt, W. P. (2007). Quantitative research methods for professionals, Pearson Education, Boston.
Walker, D. H. T. (1997). “Choosing an appropriate research methodology.” Constr. Manage. Econom., 15(2), 149–159.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Volume 136 • Issue 1 • January 2010
Pages: 108 - 116
Copyright
© 2010 ASCE.
History
Received: Jul 29, 2008
Accepted: Dec 29, 2008
Published online: Mar 27, 2009
Published in print: Jan 2010
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.