Evaluating Qualification-Based Selection System: A Simulation Approach
Publication: Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Volume 135, Issue 6
Abstract
Abnormally low bids and contractors’ opportunistic bidding behavior are frequently observed in the competitive bidding system. Many research findings have pointed out that price competition itself is not sufficient to guarantee the use of economical and good quality products. The qualification-based selection (QBS) system has been proposed as a potential solution to this problem. However, due to lack of supporting data, most previous studies could only assess its effectiveness based on a single case experience and subjective opinions from questionnaire surveys. Few studies have analyzed contractors’ pricing behavior under the QBS system and the effects of the QBS system on market competition. This paper develops a simulation model to analyze contractors’ pricing behavior and dynamic competition process under the QBS system. The research results suggest that although the QBS system has potential to encourage contractors to place more emphasis on project quality, once the price is included as one of the selection criteria, abnormally low bids could still be problematic. The success of the QBS system is highly dependent on the linkage between contractors’ past performance and the evaluation of contractors’ qualifications. Only when contractors’ past performance is carefully and constantly examined and closely reflected in the bid evaluation can the contractors’ opportunistic bidding behavior be reduced and quality products be ensured.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
Beard, J., Loukakis, M. C., and Wundram, E. C. (2001). Design-build: Planning through development, McGraw-Hill, New York.
Crowley, L. G., and Hancher, D. E. (1995). “Evaluation of competitive bids.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 121(2), 238–245.
Doyle, W. J., and DeStephanis, A. (1990). Preparing bids to avoid claims: Construction bidding law, R. F. Cushman and W. J. Doyle, eds., Wiley, New York, 17–45.
Gransberg, D. D., and Ellicott, M. A. (1996). “Best value contracting: Breaking the low-bid paradigm.” 1996 AACE Transactions, AACE Int., Vancouver, VE&C.5.1–VE&C.5.4.
Grogan, T. (1992). “Low bids raise hidden costs.” ENR, 228(13), 30–31.
Henriod, E. E., and Lantern, J. M. (1988). Trends in contracting practice for civil works, Task Force on Innovative Practice, World Bank, Washington, D.C.
Herbsman, Z., and Ellis, R. (1992). “Multiparameter bidding system—Innovation in contract administration.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 118(1), 142–150.
Ho, S. P., and Liu, L. Y. (2004). “Analytical model for analyzing construction claims and opportunistic bidding.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 130(1), 94–104.
Holt, G. D., Olomolaiye, P. O., and Harris, F. C. (1994). “Evaluating prequalification criteria in contractor selection.” Build. Environ., 29(4), 437–448.
Joiner, B. L., Reynard, S., and Ando, Y. (1994). Fourth generation management: The new business consciousness, McGraw-Hill, New York.
Lo, W., Lin, C. L., and Yan, M. R. (2007). “Contractor’s opportunistic bidding behavior and equilibrium price level in construction market.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 133(6), 409–416.
Richardson, G. P., and Pugh, A. L. (1981). Introduction to system dynamics modeling with DYNAMO, MIT, Cambridge, Mass.
Russell, J. S., Hancher, D. E. and Skibniewski, M. J. (1992). “Contractor prequalification data for construction owners.” Construction Management and Economics, 10(2), 117–135.
Singh, D., and Tiong, L. K. (2006). “Contractor selection criteria: Investigation of opinions of Singapore construction practitioners.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 132(9), 998–1008.
Sterman, J. D. (2000). Business dynamics—Systems thinking and modeling for a complex world, International Ed., McGraw-Hill, New York.
Varian, H. R. (1992). Microeconomic analysis, Third Ed., W. W. Norton & Co., New York.
Wang, W. C., Wang, H. H., Lai, Y. T., and Li, C. C. (2006). “Unit-price-based model for evaluating competitive bids.” Int. J. Proj. Manage., 24(2), 156–166.
Wardani, E. I., Messner, I., and Horman, J. (2006). “Comparing procurement methods for design-build projects.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 132(3), 230–238.
Winch, G. M. (2000). “Institutional reform in British construction: Partnering and private finance.” Build. Res. Inf., 28(2), 141–155.
Yan, M. R., Lo, W., and Lin, C. L. (2005). “Critical driving force for contractor’s opportunistic bidding behavior in public works.” Proc., 1st Int. Conf. on Construction Engineering and Management (ICCEM), Seoul, Korea, Korean Inst. of Construction Engineering and Management (KICEM), 417–423.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Volume 135 • Issue 6 • June 2009
Pages: 458 - 465
Copyright
© 2009 ASCE.
History
Received: Apr 19, 2008
Accepted: Sep 18, 2008
Published online: May 15, 2009
Published in print: Jun 2009
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.