Technical Papers
Sep 19, 2022

Feasibility Study of Using Close-Range Photogrammetry as an Asset-Inventory Tool at Public Transportation Agencies

Publication: Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities
Volume 36, Issue 6

Abstract

Precise documentation of as-is status of transportation infrastructures is an essential task for several public transportation agencies. To tackle this task, such agencies have adopted various advanced technologies, such as light detection and ranging (LiDAR), for three-dimensional (3D) reconstruction and as-built documentation purposes. In this research, we study the feasibility of an alternative 3D reconstruction method, photogrammetry, which has the advantage of being inexpensive and easy to operate compared to LiDAR. To assess the proposed alternative method in transportation asset-inventory collection, this paper evaluates the feasibility of using photogrammetry in providing an acceptable 3D point cloud model of two important categories of transportation assets: roadway assets and pedestrian access ramps. The analysis of the data quality and associated cost attests to the feasibility of using close-range photogrammetry in pedestrian access ramps inventory, while using this technology as a complementary tool with LiDAR in the mobile setting holds the promise for a feasible roadway asset data collection.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

Some or all data, models, or codes that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Acknowledgments

This research project has been funded by the Utah Department of Transportation (UDOT). The authors gratefully acknowledge UDOT’s support and would like to thank Vincent Liu, Abdul Wakil, Paul Wheeler, and Michael Butler for their support with this research. Any opinions, findings, conclusions, and recommendations expressed in this manuscript are those of the authors and do not reflect the views of the funding agency.

References

3Dflow Technology. 2020. “3DF Zephyr: 3D modeling software, version 5.0.” Accessed June 10, 2020. https://www.3dflow.net/.
Adam Technology. 2008. “Laser scanning vs digital photogrammetry.” Accessed February 10, 2020. http://archive.amerisurv.com/PDF/LaserScanningVsPhotogrammetry080108.pdf.
Aguilera, D. G., and J. G. Lahoz. 2006. “Laser scanning or image-based modeling? A comparative through the modelization of San Nicolas Church.” Int. Arch. Photogramm. Rem. Sens. 36: B5.
Applanix. 2020. “POSPac software, version 8.” Accessed May 12, 2020. https://www.applanix.com/products/pospac-mms.htm.
Baltsavias, E. P. 1999. “A comparison between photogrammetry and laser scanning.” ISPRS J. Photogramm. Remote Sens. 54 (2–3): 83–94. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0924-2716(99)00014-3.
Becerra, L. 2010. “Americans with disabilities act 2010 ADA standards.” Accessed January 25, 2020. https://www.ada.gov/2010ADAstandards_index.htm.
Bentley. 2016. “Comparing aerial photogrammetry and 3D laser scanning methods for creating 3D models of complex objects.” Accessed February 10, 2020. http://connectpress.com/portal/downloads/BentleyContextCapture3DScanningComparisonWhitePaperSeptember2016.pdf.
Bentley, J. L. 1975. “Multidimensional binary search trees used for associative searching.” Commun. ACM 18 (9): 509–517. https://doi.org/10.1145/361002.361007.
Bentley Production. 2020. “ContextCapture: Reality modeling software, version update 15.” Accessed June 19, 2020. https://www.bentley.com/en/products/product-line/reality-modeling-software/contextcapture.
Brown, L. G. 1992. “A survey of image registration techniques.” ACM Comput. Surv. 24 (4): 325–376. https://doi.org/10.1145/146370.146374.
Bureau of Transportation Statistics. 2016. “Table 1-4: Public road and street mileage in the United States by type of surface.” Accessed March 20, 2020. http://www.rita.dot.gov/bts/sites/rita.dot.gov.bts/files/publications/national_transportation_statistics/html/table_01_04.html.
Cross, C., M. Farhadmanesh, and A. Rashidi. 2020. Assessing close-range photogrammetry as an alternative for LiDAR technology at UDOT divisions. Salt Lake City, UT: Utah DOT.
Dai, F., A. Rashidi, I. Brilakis, and P. Vela. 2013. “Comparison of image-based and time-of-flight-based technologies for three-dimensional reconstruction of infrastructure.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 139 (1): 69–79. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0000565.
Drones Made Easy. 2020. “Map pilot control application, version 4.0.0.” Accessed June 5, 2020. https://dronesmadeeasy.com/map-pilot.
Ellsworth, P. 2013. “Utah DOT leveraging LiDAR for leap to asset management.” LiDAR Art Scan 3 (1): 38–43.
Farhadmanesh, M., C. Cross, A. H. Mashhadi, A. Rashidi, and J. Wempen. 2021. Use of mobile photogrammetry method for highway asset management. Washington, DC: Transportation Research Board.
Golparvar-Fard, M., J. Bohn, J. Teizer, S. Savarese, and F. Peña-Mora. 2011. “Evaluation of image-based modeling and laser scanning accuracy for emerging automated performance monitoring techniques.” Autom. Constr. 20 (8): 1143–1155. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2011.04.016.
Guan, H., J. Li, S. Cao, and Y. Yu. 2016. “Use of mobile LiDAR in road information inventory: A review.” Int. J. Image Data Fusion 7 (3): 219–242. https://doi.org/10.1080/19479832.2016.1188860.
Harris, D. K., C. N. Brooks, and T. T. M. Ahlborn. 2016. “Synthesis of field performance of remote sensing strategies for condition assessment of in-service bridges in Michigan.” J. Perform. Constr. Facil. 30 (5): 04016027. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CF.1943-5509.0000844.
Hartley, R., and A. Zisserman. 2003. Multiple view geometry in computer vision. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
He, Y., Z. Song, and Z. Liu. 2017. “Updating highway asset inventory using airborne LiDAR.” Measurement 104 (Jul): 132–141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement.2017.03.026.
Huang, T., S. Poddar, C. Aguilar, A. Sharma, E. Smaglik, S. Kothuri, and P. Koonce. 2018. “Building intelligence in automated traffic signal performance measures with advanced data analytics.” Transp. Res. Rec. 2672 (18): 154–166. https://doi.org/10.1177/0361198118791380.
Jalayer, M., H. Zhou, J. Gong, S. Hu, and M. Grinter. 2014. “A comprehensive assessment of highway inventory data collection methods.” J. Transp. Res. Forum 53 (1424): 73–92.
Jaselskis, E. J., Z. Gao, and R. C. Walters. 2005. “Improving transportation projects using laser scanning.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 131 (3): 377–384. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(2005)131:3(377).
Kamari, M., and Y. Ham. 2021. “Vision-based volumetric measurements via deep learning-based point cloud segmentation for material management in jobsites.” Autom. Constr. 121 (Jan): 103430. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2020.103430.
Khanal, M., M. Hasan, N. Sterbentz, R. Johnson, and J. Weatherly. 2020. “Accuracy comparison of aerial lidar, mobile-terrestrial lidar, and UAV photogrammetric capture data elevations over different terrain types.” Infrastructures 5 (8): 65. https://doi.org/10.3390/infrastructures5080065.
Lowe, D. G. 1999. “Object recognition from local scale-invariant features.” In Vol. 2 of Proc., Seventh IEEE Int. Conf. on Computer Vision, 1150–1157. New York: IEEE.
Moons, T., L. Van Gool, and M. Vergauwen. 2009. 3D reconstruction from multiple images: Principles. Delft, Netherlands: Now Publishers.
Nohekhan, A., and K. Farokhi Sadabadi. 2019. Real-time detection and localization framework for building traffic sign inventory. Washington, DC: Transportation Research Board.
Oniga, V. E., A. I. Breaban, E. I. Alexe, and C. Văsii. 2021. “Indoor mapping of a complex cultural heritage scene using Tls and Hmls laser scanning.” Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci. 43: 605–612.
Pix4D. 2020. “Pix4Dmapper: Photogrammetry software for drone mapping, version 4.5.4.” Accessed June 17, 2020. https://support.pix4d.com/hc/en-us.
Popescu, C., B. Täljsten, T. Blanksvärd, and L. Elfgren. 2019. “3D Reconstruction of existing concrete bridges using optical methods.” Struct. Infrastruct. Eng. 15 (7): 912–924. https://doi.org/10.1080/15732479.2019.1594315.
Puente, I., M. Solla, H. González-Jorge, and P. Arias. 2015. “NDT documentation and evaluation of the Roman Bridge of Lugo using GPR and mobile and static LiDAR.” J. Perform. Constr. Facil. 29 (1): 06014004. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CF.1943-5509.0000531.
Rashidi, A., F. Dai, I. Brilakis, and P. Vela. 2013. “Optimized selection of key frames for monocular videogrammetric surveying of civil infrastructure.” Adv. Eng. Inf. 27 (2): 270–282. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aei.2013.01.002.
Rashidi, A., and E. Karan. 2018. “Video to BrIM: Automated 3D as-built documentation of bridges.” J. Perform. Constr. Facil. 32 (3): 04018026. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CF.1943-5509.0001163.
Telecom ParisTech. 2020. “CloudCompare: 3D processing software, version 2.11.” Accessed February 27, 2020. http://www.cloudcompare.org/.
UDOT (Utah DOT). 2020. “C-170 pedestrian access ramp evaluation form.” Accessed August 12, 2020. https://drive.google.com/file/d/1MBfdw3TbEvFHh9IAVVm5H64V_BHZkTor/view.
Ullman, S. 1979. The interpretation of visual motion. Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
US Department of Justice. 2010. “ADA standards for accessible design. Department of Justice.” Accessed January 22, 2020. https://www.ada.gov/2010ADAstandards_index.htm.
USDOT and Federal Highway Administration. 2020. “Pedestrians and accessible design.” Accessed July 10, 2020. https://www.fhwa.dot.gov/programadmin/pedestrians.cfm.
Uslu, B., M. Golparvar-Fard, and J. M. de la Garza. 2011. “Image-based 3D reconstruction and recognition for enhanced highway condition assessment.” In Computing in civil engineering. Reston, VA: ASCE. https://doi.org/10.1061/41182(416)9.
Utah State Highway Sign Supplement. 2009. “The manual on uniform traffic control devices.” Accessed March 9, 2020. https://mutcd.fhwa.dot.gov/resources/state_info/utah/ut.htm.
Utah Transportation Asset Management Plan. 2019. “Asset management tiers.” Accessed January 9, 2020. http://www.tamptemplate.org/wp-content/uploads/tamps/053_utahdot.pdf.
Watson, C., S. E. Chen, H. Bian, and E. Hauser. 2012. “Three-dimensional terrestrial LIDAR for operational bridge clearance measurements.” J. Perform. Constr. Facil. 26 (6): 803–811. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CF.1943-5509.0000277.
Zhou, H., M. Jalayer, J. Gong, S. Hu, and M. Grinter. 2013. Investigation of methods and approaches for collecting and recording highway inventory data. Rantoul, IL: Illinois Center for Transportation.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities
Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities
Volume 36Issue 6December 2022

History

Received: Aug 18, 2021
Accepted: May 31, 2022
Published online: Sep 19, 2022
Published in print: Dec 1, 2022
Discussion open until: Feb 19, 2023

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

ASCE Technical Topics:

Authors

Affiliations

Ph.D. Student, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT 84112 (corresponding author). ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6772-0908. Email: [email protected]
Chandler Cross [email protected]
M.S. Student, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT 84112. Email: [email protected]
Abbas Rashidi, M.ASCE [email protected]
Assistant Professor, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT 84112. Email: [email protected]
Jessica Wempen [email protected]
Assistant Professor, Dept. of Mining Engineering, Univ. of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT 84112. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share