Abstract
This paper presents the results of damage surveys in Mirpur, in the Azad Jammu and Kashmir region of Pakistan, which was affected by a moderate earthquake on September 24, 2019. The epicenter of this earthquake was near the city of Mirpur at a shallow depth of no more than 10 km. Rupture of ground surface was observed in the area close to the epicenter, which can be associated with the release of seismic energy at shallow depths. The ground acceleration recorded at the site close to the epicenter was influenced by the rupture directivity effects. A significantly high vertical component of ground acceleration was observed at a site in close vicinity of the epicenter. Ground-motion amplification was also indicated by the data analysis in the presence of soft soil. A few low- to medium-rise reinforced concrete buildings were severely damaged by the ground shaking. The columns in these buildings experienced compression or shear-compression mode of failure in the presence of high axial compression applied by the vertical seismic forces and/or overturning moment. The longitudinal bars in the columns also buckled due to high axial compression demands coupled with insufficient confinement in the plastic hinging regions.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
Data Availability Statement
All data, models, and code generated or used during the study appear in the published article.
Acknowledgments
The authors wish to acknowledge the logistical support provided by the staff members at Mirpur University of Science & Technology, Azad Jammu and Kashmir, during the surveys and data collection for the presented studies in this paper. Professor Humberto Varum acknowledges the financial support provided by the Project POCI-01-0145-FEDER-007457—CONSTRUCT—Institute of R&D in Structures and Construction, funded by FEDER funds through COMPETE2020—Programa Operacional Competitividade e Internacionalização (POCI)—and by national funds through FCT (Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia).
References
ACI (American Concrete Institute). 2002. Building code requirements for structural concrete. ACI 318R-02. Detroit: ACI.
Akkar, S., M. A. Sandikkaya, and B. Ö. Ay. 2014. “Compatible ground-motion prediction equations for damping scaling factors and vertical-to-horizontal spectral amplitude ratios for the broader European region.” Bull. Earthquake Eng. 12 (1): 517–547. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-013-9537-1.
Archuleta, R. J., and S. H. Hartzell. 1981. “Effects of fault finiteness on near-source ground motion.” Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 71 (4): 939–957. https://doi.org/10.1785/BSSA0710040939.
ASCE/SEI. 2016. Minimum design loads for buildings and other structures. ASCE/SEI 7-16. Reston, VA: ASCE.
Avar, B. B., and N. W. Hudyma. 2018. “Surface fault rupture hazard and observations on current interdisciplinary research.” In Proc., American Rock Mechanics Association (ARMA) Symp. Alexandria, VA: American Rock Mechanics Association.
Badaoui, M., M. K. Berrah, and A. Mebarki. 2009. “Soil height randomness influence on seismic response: Case of an Algiers site.” Comput. Geotech. 36 (1–2): 102–112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compgeo.2008.04.001.
Bommer, J. J., S. Akkar, and O. Kale. 2011. “A model for vertical-to-horizontal response spectral ratios for Europe and the Middle East.” Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 101 (4): 1783–1806. https://doi.org/10.1785/0120100285.
Bovo, M., and M. Savoia. 2019. “Evaluation of force fluctuations induced by vertical seismic component on reinforced concrete precast structures.” Eng. Struct. 178 (Jan): 70–87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2018.10.018.
Bozorgnia, Y., and K. W. Campbell. 2016. “Ground motion model for the vertical-to-horizontal (V/H) ratios of PGA, PGV, and response spectra.” Earthquake Spectra 32 (2): 951–978. https://doi.org/10.1193/100614eqs151m.
Bozorgnia, Y., M. Niazi, and K. W. Campbell. 1995. “Characteristics of free-field vertical ground motion during the Northridge earthquake.” Earthquake Spectra 11 (4): 515–525. https://doi.org/10.1193/1.1585825.
Broderick, B. M., A. S. Elnashai, N. N. Ambraseys, J. J. Barr, R. G. Goodfellow, and E. M. Higazy. 1994. The Northridge (California) earthquake of 17 January 1994: Observations, strong-motion and correlative response analyses. London: Imperial College.
CEN (European Committee for Standardization). 2004. Eurocode 8. Design of structures for earthquake resistance—Part 1: General rules, seismic actions and rules for buildings. EN 1998-1. Brussels, Belgium: CEN.
Decaninni, L. D., L. Liberatore, and F. Mollaiolli. 2002. “Response of bare and infilled R.C. frames under the effect of horizontal and vertical excitation.” In Proc., 12th European Conf. on Earthquake Engineering. London: Elsevier Science.
Diotallevi, P. P., and L. Landi. 2000. “Response of structures subjected to horizontal and vertical ground motions.” In Proc., 8th US National Conf. on Earthquake Engineering. Oakland, CA: Earthquake Engineering Research Institute.
EERA (Earthquake Reconstruction and Rehabilitation Authority). 2006. “Annual review 2005 to 2006: Rebuild, revive with dignity and hope. Prime Minister‘s Secretariat.” Accessed February 8, 2014. http://www.erra.gov.pk/Reports/ERRA-Review-200506.pdf.
Elgamal, A. S., and L. He. 2004. “Vertical ground motion records: An overview.” Earthquake Eng. 8 (5): 663–697. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632460409350505.
Elnashai, A. S., and A. J. Papazoglou. 1997. “Procedure and spectra for analysis of RC structures subjected to strong vertical earthquake loads.” J. Earthquake Eng. 1 (1): 121–156. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632469708962364.
Farsangi, E. N., and A. A. Tasnimi. 2016. “The influence of coupled horizontal–vertical ground excitations on the collapse margins of modern RC-MRFs.” Int. J. Adv. Struct. Eng. 8 (2): 169–192. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40091-016-0122-0.
Gazzetta Ufficiale della Repubblica Italiana. 2018. Consiglio Superiore dei Lavori Pubblici Norme Tecniche delle Costruzioni. [In Italian.] Rome, Italy: Consiglio Superiore Lavori Publici.
Goltz, J. D., ed. 1994. The Northridge, California earthquake of January 17, 1994 General reconnaissance report. Buffalo, NY: National Center for Earthquake Engineering Research.
Gulerce, Z., and N. A. Abrahamson. 2011. “Site-specific design spectra for vertical ground motion.” Earthquake Spectra 27 (4): 1023–1047. https://doi.org/10.1193/1.3651317.
Hall, J. F., ed. 1995. “Northridge Earthquake of January 17, 1994: Reconnaissance report.” In Vol. 1 of Supplement to Earthquake Spectra Volume 11, 523. Oakland, CA: Earthquake Engineering Research Institute.
ICBO (International Conference of Building Officials). 1997. Uniform building code (UBC 9). Whittier, CA: ICBO.
Ishikawa, N., M. Bepu, S. Katsuku, A. Miyamoto, and K. Brandes. 2000. “Structural response of RC pier under vertical earthquake shock.” In Proc., 12th World Conf. on Earthquake Engineering, Wellington, New Zealand: New Zealand Society for Earthquake Engineering.
Kikuchi, K., and K. Yoshimura. 1984. “Effect of vertical component of ground motions and axial deformation of columns on seismic behavior of RC building strucutres.” In Proc., 8th World Conf. on Earthquake Engineering, 599–606. Oakland, CA: Earthquake Engineering Research Institute.
Memarpour, M. M., G. G. Amiri, H. Razeghi, M. Akbarzadeh, and A. T. Davoudi. 2016. “Characteristics of horizontal and vertical near-field ground motions and investigation of their effects on the dynamic response of bridges.” J. Rehabil. Civ. Eng. 4 (2): 1–24.
MoHW (Ministry of Housing & Works). 2007. Building code of Pakistan (seismic provisions-2007). Islamabad, Pakistan: Government of Pakistan.
NDMA (National Disaster Management Authority). 2019. NDMA situation report No. 18—Mirpur Earthquake 2019. Islamabad, Pakistan: NDMA.
NEHRP (National Earthquake Hazards Reduction Program). 2020. Recommended seismic provisions for new buildings and other structures. FEMA P-20821. Washington, DC: FEMA.
Nezamabadi, M. F., A. S. Moghadam, and M. Hosseini. 2008. “The effect of vertical component of earthquake on seismic response of torsionally coupled systems.” J. Appl. Sci. 8 (22): 4029–4039. https://doi.org/10.3923/jas.2008.4029.4039.
NZS (New Zealand Standards). 2004. Structural Design Actions Part 5: Earthquake actions. NZS 1170.5. New Zealand: Council of Standards New Zealand.
Papazoglou, A. J., and A. S. Elnashai. 1996. “Analytical and field evidence of the damaging effect of vertical earthquake ground motion.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn. 25 (10): 1109–1137. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1096-9845(199610)25:10%3C1109::AID-EQE604%3E3.0.CO;2-0.
PWP (Pakistan Weather Portal). 2013. “History of earthquakes in Pakistan—In detail!” Accessed February 8, 2014. http://pakistanweatherportal.com/2011/07/30/history-of-earthquakes-in-pakistan-in-detail/.
Rafique, M., H. Rehman, M. Matiullah, F. Malik, M. U. Rajput, S. U. Rahman, and M. H. Rathore. 2011. “Assessment of radiological hazards due to soil and building materials used in Mirpur Azad Kashmir; Pakistan.” Iran. J. Radiat. Res. 9 (2): 77–87.
Ramadan, F., C. Smerzini, G. Lanzano, and F. Pacor. 2021. “An empirical model for the vertical to horizontal spectral ratios for Italy.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn. 50 (15): 4121–4141. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.3548.
Somerville, P. G., N. F. Smith, R. W. Graves, and N. A. Abrahamson. 1997. “Modification of empirical strong ground motion attenuation relations to include the amplitude and duration effects of rupture directivity.” Seismol. Res. Lett. 68 (1): 199–222. https://doi.org/10.1785/gssrl.68.1.199.
TBEC (Turkish Building Earthquake Code). 2018. Regulations for buildings to be constructed in earthquake prone areas. TBEC-18. Ankara, Turkey: TBEC.
USGS. 2019. “Earthquake Hazards Program: M 5.4—7km SSE of New Mirpur, Pakistan.” Accessed December 11, 2019. https://earthquake.usgs.gov/earthquakes/eventpage/us60005mqp/executive.
Wang, Z., D. Huo, and X. Li. 1989. “Analysis of seismic response for high0rise building structure under vertical ground motion.” In Proc., 9th World Conf. on Earthquake Engineering, 471–475. Tokyo: WCEE Organization Committee.
Wenk, T., C. Lacave, K. Peter. 1998. The Adana-Ceyhan Earthquake of June 27, 1998: Report on the Reconnaissance Mission from July 6–12, 1998 of the Swiss Society of Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics (SGEB). Accessed November 20, 2000. http://www.ibk.baum.ethz.ch/publ/Ba/WLP98a.html.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
© 2022 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: Nov 5, 2021
Accepted: Apr 21, 2022
Published online: Jun 30, 2022
Published in print: Oct 1, 2022
Discussion open until: Nov 30, 2022
ASCE Technical Topics:
- Compression
- Concrete
- Concrete structures
- Continuum mechanics
- Damage (material)
- Damage (structural)
- Dynamics (solid mechanics)
- Earthquakes
- Engineering fundamentals
- Engineering materials (by type)
- Engineering mechanics
- Forensic engineering
- Geohazards
- Geotechnical engineering
- Geotechnical investigation
- Ground motion
- Materials characterization
- Materials engineering
- Reinforced concrete
- Seismic tests
- Solid mechanics
- Structural dynamics
- Structural engineering
- Structures (by type)
- Tests (by type)
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.
Cited by
- Zeshan Alam, Shehryar Ahmed, Mashhood Fiaz, Ehsan Noroozinejad Farsangi, An Insight into the Characteristics of the September 24, 2019, 5.8 Mirpur, Pakistan, Earthquake and Reconnaissance of the Induced-Failure Modes in Buildings and Civil Infrastructure Facilities, Practice Periodical on Structural Design and Construction, 10.1061/PPSCFX.SCENG-1331, 28, 4, (2023).
- Muhammad Masood Rafi, Muhammad Ahmed, Sarosh Hashmat Lodi, Humberto Varum, Muhammad Tausif Arshad, Naveed Alam, Development of Fragility Functions for Brick Masonry Structures Using Damage Data from September 24, 2019, Earthquake in Mirpur, Azad Kashmir, Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities, 10.1061/JPCFEV.CFENG-4441, 37, 4, (2023).