Technical Papers
Jun 11, 2021

Structural Response of Multistory RC Buildings to Excavation of a Disposal Well

Publication: Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities
Volume 35, Issue 4

Abstract

Soakaway disposal wells are used heavily in Sudan for on-site sanitation systems. These wells have a diameter of 1.5–2.0 m, a depth ranging from 10 to 35 m, and postinstalled brick walls. They often are located close to a building foundation and seldom are excavated between footings. Although engineers are aware of induced ground movements, the influence of such movements on existing structures currently is ignored both during new excavations as well as in the structural design of new buildings. This paper studied the response of RC frame structures to settlements and horizontal movements induced by well excavation using a soil–structure interaction model. The model, adopting beam theory for the structural elements and the half-space model for the ground, uses the stiffness approach to solve the excavation–soil–structure interaction. For typical RC frames in Sudan, foundation movements caused by well excavation, additional forces in the upper frame, and resulting deformations of infill walls were addressed. As a practical suggestion, for the structural design of new structures it is recommended to use strap beams connecting pads to stiffen horizontally the foundation and, thus reduce unfavorable effects of (possible) well excavations.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

Some or all data, models, or codes that support the findings of this study are available from the authors upon reasonable request.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Salaheldin A. M. Abdelmageed, MIStructE BSc PMP FSES, for his valuable discussion of the codes’ structural measures.

References

Abdelatif, A. O., and T. E. Isshage. 2019. “Excavation of disposal wells nearby existing buildings effects and design precautions.” In Proc., 17th African Regional Conf. on Soil Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering. London: International Society for Soil Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering.
Bloodworth, A. G. 2002. “Three-dimensional analysis of tunnelling effects on structures to develop design methods.” Ph.D. thesis, Dept. of Engineering Science, Univ. of Oxford.
Bloodworth, A. G., and G. T. Bloodworth. 1999. “Three dimensional analysis of building settlement caused by shaft construction.” In Proc. of an Int. Symp. on Geotechnical Aspects of Underground Construction in Soft Ground. London: International Society for Soil Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering.
Boscardin, M. D., and E. J. Cording. 1989. “Building response to excavation-induced settlement.” J. Geotech. Eng. 115 (1): 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9410(1989)115:1(1).
BSI (British Standards Institution). 2004. Eurocode 7: Geotechnical design—Part 1: General rules. BS EN 1997-1: 2004. London: BSI.
BSI (British Standards Institution). 2005. Basis of structural design. BS EN 1990: 2002+ A1. London: BSI.
Burland, J. B., B. B. Broms, and V. F. B. De Mello. 1977. Behaviour of foundations and structures. Garston, UK: Building Research Establishment.
Dalgic, K. D. M. A. N. Hendriks, A. Ilki, and W. Broere. 2018. “A two-stage numerical analysis approach for the assessment of the settlement response of the pre-damaged historic Hoca Pasha Mosque.” Int. J. Archit. Herit. 13 (5): 707–724. https://doi.org/10.1080/15583058.2018.1469174.
Elkayam, I., and A. Klar. 2019. “Nonlinear elastoplastic formulation for tunneling effects on superstructures.” Can. Geotech. J. 56 (7): 956–969. https://doi.org/10.1139/cgj-2018-0021.
Faustin, N. E., M. Z. E. B. Elshafie, and R. J. Mair. 2018. “Case studies of circular shaft construction in London.” Proc. Inst. Civ. Eng. Geotech. Eng. 171 (5): 391–404. https://doi.org/10.1680/jgeen.17.00166.
Franza, A., and M. J. Dejong. 2019. “Elastoplastic solutions to predict tunneling-induced load redistribution and deformation of surface structures.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 145 (4): 04019007. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0002021.
Franza, A., S. Ritter, and M. J. Dejong. 2020. “Continuum solutions for tunnel–building interaction and a modified framework for deformation prediction.” Géotechnique 70 (2): 108–122. https://doi.org/10.1680/jgeot.17.P.279.
Goh, K. H., and R. J. Mair. 2014. “Response of framed buildings to excavation-induced movements.” Soils Found. 54 (3): 250–268. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sandf.2014.04.002.
Haji, T. K., A. M. Marshall, and W. Tizani. 2018. “A cantilever approach to estimate bending stiffness of buildings affected by tunneling.” Tunnelling Underground Space Technol. 71 (Jan): 47–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2017.08.005.
Le, B. T., R. J. Goodey, and S. Divall. 2019. “Subsurface ground movements due to circular shaft construction.” Soils Found. 59 (5): 1160–1171. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sandf.2019.03.013.
Mair, R. J., R. N. Taylor, and J. B. Burland. 1996. “Prediction of ground movements and assessment of risk of building damage due to bored tunneling.” In Geotechnical aspects of underground construction in soft ground, 713–718. London: International Society for Soil Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering.
New, B. 2017. “Settlements due to shaft construction.” Tunnels Tunnelling Int. 16–17.
New, B. M., and K. H. Bowers. 1994. “Ground movement model validation at the Heathrow Express trial tunnel.” In Tunnelling’94, 301–329. Boston: Springer.
Son, M., and J. E. Cording. 2005. “Estimation of building damage due to excavation-induced ground movements.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 131 (2): 162–177. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2005)131:2(162).
Vaziri, H. B. Simpson, J. W. Pappin, and L. Simpson. 1982. “Integrated forms of Mindlin’s equations.” Géotechnique 32 (3): 275–278. https://doi.org/10.1680/geot.1982.32.3.275.
Wong, R. C. K., and P. K. Kaiser. 1988. “Behaviour of vertical shafts: Reevaluation of model test results and evaluation of field measurements.” Can. Geotech. J. 25 (2): 338–352. https://doi.org/10.1139/t88-035.
Xu, J. A. Franza, A. M. Marshall, N. Losacco, and D. Boldini. 2020. “Tunnel–framed building interaction: Comparison between raft and separate footing foundations.” Géotechnique 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1680/jgeot.19.P.393.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities
Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities
Volume 35Issue 4August 2021

History

Received: Dec 28, 2020
Accepted: Apr 6, 2021
Published online: Jun 11, 2021
Published in print: Aug 1, 2021
Discussion open until: Nov 11, 2021

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Associate Professor, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Univ. of Khartoum, P.O. Box 321, Khartoum 51111, Sudan (corresponding author). ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3116-6834. Email: [email protected]; [email protected]
Research Fellow, Dept. of Civil and Architectural Engineering, Aarhus Univ., Aarhus 8000, Denmark. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8510-0355. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share