Abstract

Open deck steel bridges are characterized by the direct connection of transoms to the bridge girders. The expansion of steel girders due to thermal loads is transmitted by the fastening system to the track in the transition zones as compressive loads. Adding compressive thermal loads in continuously welded rails (CWRs) and train braking can significantly increase track buckling potential in the transition zones of open deck bridges. This paper treats the static and dynamic track buckling in the transition zones of open deck steel bridges using a multibody train-track dynamic model and a three-dimensional finite-element track model. Considering resilient fasteners and zero toe load (ZTL) fasteners, six fastening profiles are defined. For the train-track interaction, normal and severe braking of wheels is considered. Based on the results, it is concluded that dynamic buckling temperature depends chiefly on steel girder temperature and location of misalignment. Using a combination of resilient fasteners and ZTLs can be an effective way to enhance the performance of CWR tracks on open deck steel bridges.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

All data, models, and code generated or used during the study appear in the published article.

Acknowledgments

This research was supported under Australian Research Council’s Industrial Transformation Training Centres Scheme (ARC Training Centre for Advanced Technologies in Rail Track Infrastructure) (IC170100006). The work reported in this paper was formulated initially by Manicka Dhanasekar, former Professor of Infrastructure Engineering at the first author’s institution in collaboration with Queensland Rail.

References

Abaqus. 2012. Abaqus user’s manual. Johnston, RI: Providence Dassault Systemes Simulia.
Ahmad, S. S., N. K. Mandal, G. Chattopadhyay and J. Powell. 2013. “Development of a unified railway track stability management tool to enhance track safety.” Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng., Part F: J. Rail Rapid Transit 227 (5): 493–516.
Ali, S., D. Thambiratnam, X. Liu, and S. Fawzia. 2020. “Performance evaluation of innovative composite pedestrian bridge.” Structures 26: 845–858. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.istruc.2020.05.010.
Ataei, S., and A. Miri. 2018. “Investigating dynamic amplification factor of railway masonry arch bridges through dynamic load tests.” Constr. Build. Mater. 183 (Sep): 693–705. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.06.151.
Ataei, S., A. Miri, and M. Jahangiri. 2017a. “Assessment of load carrying capacity enhancement of an open spandrel masonry arch bridge by dynamic load testing.” Int. J. Archit. Heritage 11 (8): 1086–1100. https://doi.org/10.1080/15583058.2017.1317882.
Ataei, S., A. Miri, and M. Jahangiri. 2017b. “Assessing safety of a railway stone arch bridge by experimental and numerical analyses.” J. Croatian Assoc. Civ. Eng. 69 (11): 1017–1029. https://doi.org/10.14256/JCE.1612.2016.
Ataei, S., A. Miri, and M. Tajalli. 2017c. “Dynamic load testing of a railway masonry arch bridge: A case study of Babak Bridge.” Sci. Iran. 24 (4): 1834–1842. https://doi.org/10.24200/sci.2017.4274.
Ataei, S., A. Miri, and M. Tajalli. 2018. “Implementing relative deflection of adjacent blocks in model calibration of masonry arch bridges.” J. Perform. Constr. Facil. 32 (4): 04018037. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CF.1943-5509.0001171.
Ataei, S., S. Mohammadzadeh, H. Jadidi, and A. Miri. 2014. “Effects of maintenance operations on railway track’s mechanical behaviour by field load testing.” Int. J. Pavement Eng. 15 (3): 215–227. https://doi.org/10.1080/10298436.2013.778991.
Ataei, S., S. Mohammadzadeh, and A. Miri. 2016a. “Dynamic forces at square and inclined rail joints: Field experiments.” J. Transp. Eng. 142 (9): 04016035. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)TE.1943-5436.0000866.
Ataei, S., M. Tajalli, and A. Miri. 2016b. “Assessment of load carrying capacity and fatigue life expectancy of a monumental Masonry Arch Bridge by field load testing: A case study of Veresk.” Struct. Eng. Mech. 59 (4): 703–718. https://doi.org/10.12989/sem.2016.59.4.703.
Choi, J. 2013. “Influence of track support stiffness of ballasted track on dynamic wheel-rail forces.” J. Transp. Eng. 139 (7): 709–718. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)TE.1943-5436.0000543.
Dahlberg, T. 2010. “Railway track stiffness variations—Consequences and countermeasures.” Int. J. Civ. Eng. 8 (1): 1–12.
De Backer, H., A. Outtier, and P. Van Bogaert. 2014. “Buckling design of steel tied-arch bridges.” J. Constr. Steel Res. 103: 159–167. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2014.09.004.
Handoko, Y. 2006. Investigation of the dynamics of railway bogies subjected to traction/braking torque. Brisbane, Australia: Central Queensland Univ.
Heydari-Noghabi, H., J. N. Varandas, M. Esmaeili, and J. A. Zakeri. 2017. “Investigating the influence of auxiliary rails on dynamic behavior of railway transition zone by a 3D train-track interaction model.” Lat. Am. J. Solids Struct. 14 (11): 2000–2018. https://doi.org/10.1590/1679-78253906.
Hu, P., C. Zhang, S. Wen, and Y. Wang. 2019. “Dynamic responses of high-speed railway transition zone with various subgrade fillings.” Comput. Geotech. 108 (Apr): 17–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compgeo.2018.12.011.
Huang, H., and B. Brennecke. 2013. “Track stiffness transition zone studied with three-dimensional sandwich track model.” Transp. Res. Rec. 2374 (1): 136–142. https://doi.org/10.3141/2374-16.
Hunt, H. E. M. and Winkler. 1997. “Settlement of railway track near bridge abutments.” Proc. Inst. Civ. Eng. Transp. 123 (1): 68–73. https://doi.org/10.1680/itran.1997.29182.
Kerr, A. 1976. “The effects of lateral resistance on track buckling.” Rail Int. 1: 30–38.
Kerr, A. 1978. “Analysis of thermal track buckling in lateral plane.” Acta Mech. 30 (1): 17–50. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01177436.
Kerr, A. D., and B. E. Moroney. 1993. “Track transition problems and remedies.” Bull. Am. Railway Eng. Assoc. 742: 267–298.
Khatibi, F., M. Esmaeili, and S. Mohammadzadeh. 2020. “Numerical investigation into the effect of ballast properties on buckling of continuously welded rail (CWR).” Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. Part F: J. Rail Rapid Transit 0954409720965794.
Kish, A., and G. Samavedam. 1991. Dynamic buckling of continuous welded rail track: Theory, tests, and safety concepts. Washington, DC: Transportation Research Board.
Kish, A., G. Samavedam, and D. Jeong. 1985. Influence of vehicle induced loads on the lateral stability of CWR track. Washington, DC: Office of Research and Development, USDOT.
Lei, X. 2017. High speed railway track dynamics. Singapore: Springer.
Li, D., and D. Davis. 2005. “Transition of railroad bridge approaches.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 131 (11): 1392–1398. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2005)131:11(1392).
Li, D., J. Hyslip, T. Sussmann, and S. Chrismer. 2016. Railway geotechnics. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
Lim, N., S. Han, and T. Han. 2008. “Parametric study on stability of continuous welded rail track–ballast resistance and track irregularity.” Steel Struct. 8: 171–181.
Lim, N., N. Park, and Y. Kang. 2003. “Stability of continuous welded rail track.” Comput. Struct. 81 (22–23): 2219–2236. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0045-7949(03)00287-6.
Lim, N., and I. Sung. 2004. “Thermal buckling behaviour of continuous welded rail track.” Steel Struct. 4 (2): 111–119.
Mandal, N. K., and M. Lees. 2019. “Effectiveness of measuring stress-free temperature in continuously welded rails by rail creep method and rail stress modules.” Eng. Fail. Anal. 104 (Oct): 189–202. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfailanal.2019.05.032.
Miri, A., M. Dhanasekar, D. Thambiratnam, B. Weston, and T. H. T. Chan. 2021. “Analysis of buckling failure in continuously welded railway tracks.” Eng. Fail. Anal. 119 (Jan): 104989. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfailanal.2020.104989.
Miri, A., S. Mohammadzadeh, and H. Salek. 2017. “A finite element approach to develop track geometrcial irregularity thresholds from the safety aspect.” J. Theor. Appl. Mech. 55 (2): 695–705. https://doi.org/10.15632/jtam-pl.55.2.695.
Mohammadzadeh, S., and A. Miri. 2018. “Ballast cleaning as a solution for controlling increased bridge vibrations due to higher operational speeds.” J. Perform. Constr. Facil. 32 (5): 04018064. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CF.1943-5509.0001194.
Mohammadzadeh, S., A. Miri, and M. Nouri. 2017. “Enhancing the structural performance of masonry arch bridges with ballast mats.” J. Perform. Constr. Facil. 31 (5): 04017089. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CF.1943-5509.0001080.
Mohammadzadeh, S., A. Miri, and M. Nouri. 2018. “Assessing ballast cleaning as a rehabilitation method for railway masonry arch bridges by dynamic load tests.” Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng., Part F: J. Rail Rapid Transit 232 (4): 1135–1148. https://doi.org/10.1177/0954409717710047.
Namura, A., Y. Kohata, and S. Miura. 2004. “Effect of sleeper size on ballasted track settlement.” Q. Rep. RTRI 45 (3): 156–161. https://doi.org/10.2219/rtriqr.45.156.
Nicks, J. 2009. “The bump at the end of the railway bridge.” Ph.D. thesis, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Texas A&M Univ.
Paixão, A., J. N. Varandas, E. Fortunato, and R. Calçada. 2018. “Numerical simulations to improve the use of under sleeper pads at transition zones to railway bridges.” Eng. Struct. 164: 169–182. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2018.03.005.
Piculin, S., and P. Može. 2020. “Experimental and numerical analysis of stiffened curved plates as bottom flanges of steel bridges.” J. Constr. Steel Res. 164 (Jan): 105822. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2019.105822.
Pucillo, G. P. 2016. “Thermal buckling and post-buckling behaviour of continuous welded rail track.” Veh. Syst. Dyn. 54 (12): 1785–1807. https://doi.org/10.1080/00423114.2016.1237665.
Real, T., C. Zamorano, C. Hernández, J. A. García, and J. I. Real. 2016. “Static and dynamic behavior of transitions between different railway track typologies.” KSCE J. Civ. Eng. 20 (4): 1356–1364. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12205-015-0635-2.
Samavedam, G., A. Kish, and D. Jeong. 1986. Experimental investigations of dynamic buckling of CWR tracks. Cambridge, MA: Transportation Systems Center.
Shabana, A. A., and J. R. Sany. 2001. “A survey of rail vehicle track simulations and flexible multibody dynamics.” Nonlinear Dyn. 26 (2): 179–212. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1012976302105.
So, W., and G. Martin. 1978. “Finite element model for track buckling.” In Advanced techniques in track/train dynamics and design, 315–328. New York: Pergamon Press.
So, W., and W. Yang. 1978. “Mathematical model for lateral thermal buckling and displacement of curved track.” Transp. Res. Rec. 694 (1): 24–29.
Sol-Sánchez, M., F. Moreno-Navarro, and M. C. Rubio-Gámez. 2015. “The use of elastic elements in railway tracks: A state of the art review.” Constr. Build. Mater. 75 (Jan): 293–305. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2014.11.027.
Tafsirojjaman, T., S. Fawzia, and D. Thambiratnam. 2020a. “Investigation on the behaviour of CFRP strengthened CHS members under monotonic loading through finite element modelling.” Structures 28 (Dec): 297–308. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.istruc.2020.08.059.
Tafsirojjaman, T., S. Fawzia, D. Thambiratnam, and X.-L. Zhao. 2020b. “Numerical investigation of CFRP strengthened RHS members under cyclic loading.” Structures 24 (Apr): 610–626. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.istruc.2020.01.041.
Varandas, J. 2013. “Long-term behaviour of railway transitions under dynamic loading application to soft soil sites.” Ph.D. thesis, Faculty of Science and Technology, Universidade Nova de Lisboa.
Villalba, I. R. I., P. Salvador, and P. Martinez. 2016. “Methodology for evaluating thermal track buckling in dual gauge tracks with continuous welded rail.” Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng., Part F: J Rail Rapid Transit 231 (3): 269–279.
Yang, G., and M. A. Bradford. 2016. “Thermal-induced buckling and postbuckling analysis of continuous railway tracks.” Int. J. Solids Struct. 97–98 (Oct): 637–649. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2016.04.037.
Yang, G., and M. A. Bradford. 2018. “On train speed reduction in circumstances of thermally-induced railway track buckling.” Eng. Fail. Anal. 92 (Oct): 107–120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfailanal.2018.02.009.
Yazdani, M., and P. Azimi. 2020. “Assessment of railway plain concrete arch bridges subjected to high-speed trains.” Structures 27 (Oct): 174–193. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.istruc.2020.05.042.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities
Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities
Volume 35Issue 3June 2021

History

Received: Nov 2, 2020
Accepted: Jan 4, 2021
Published online: Apr 15, 2021
Published in print: Jun 1, 2021
Discussion open until: Sep 15, 2021

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Faculty of Science and Engineering, Queensland Univ. of Technology, Brisbane, QLD 4001, Australia (corresponding author). ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6106-5882. Email: [email protected]
David Thambiratnam, Ph.D. [email protected]
Faculty of Science and Engineering, Queensland Univ. of Technology, Brisbane, QLD 4001, Australia. Email: [email protected]
Faculty of Science and Engineering, Queensland Univ. of Technology, Brisbane, QLD 4001, Australia. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5410-8362. Email: [email protected]
Bill Weston [email protected]
P.Eng.
Engineering Services, Queensland Rail, Queensland Rail, Townsville, QLD 4810, Australia. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share