Parametric Study and Fatigue Life Evaluation Using Effective Notch Stress Approach for Rib-to-Deck Welded Joints in Orthotropic Steel Decks
Publication: Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities
Volume 35, Issue 3
Abstract
Fatigue cracking of orthotropic steel decks is a long-standing problem in bridge structures. The notch stress approach has been applied to the fatigue evaluation of steel structures. Parameters of the notch stress approach in this study include the notch type, notch radius, and level and slope of the fatigue design curve. First, a finite-element model (FEM) for the rib-to-deck welded joint using the notch stress approach is built and influences of notch types and notch radii on the notch stress are analyzed. Then, based on the fatigue test results of rib-to-deck welded joints, notch stress fatigue classification levels under different notch types and notch radii are studied. The notch stress fatigue design curves for the rib-to-deck welded joints are recommended. Finally, a multiscale model of Jiangyin Bridge is built. Based on the recommended notch type, notch radius, and notch stress fatigue design curves, the fatigue life of rib-to-deck welded joints of Jiangyin Bridge is evaluated using the notch stress approach and compared with that using the nominal stress approach and the hot-spot stress approach. The results show that the intersecting notch stress is higher than the tangent notch stress, and the notch stress decreases with the increase of the notch radius. For a weld toe tangent notch with a radius of 1 mm (0.04 in.), the fatigue class 206 (FAT206) fatigue design curve with a slope of 3.5 is recommended to be used. The fatigue class 225 (FAT225) fatigue design curve should be applied to a weld toe tangent notch with a radius of 0.75 mm (0.03 in.). A comparison of Jiangyin Bridge fatigue life evaluation results show that the bridge fatigue life calculated by the notch stress approach is lower than that calculated by the nominal stress approach and the hot-spot stress approach. When the vehicle load is 50% heavier than the fatigue standard vehicle load, the bridge fatigue life calculated by the notch stress approach is only about 5 years.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
Data Availability Statement
All data, models, or code generated or used during the study are available from the corresponding author by request.
Acknowledgments
The authors gratefully acknowledge the Program of National Natural Science Foundation of China (Nos. 51978154, 51608258, 51978033, and 51878027), the Fund for Distinguished Young Scientists of Jiangsu Province (No. BK20190013).
References
AASHTO. 2004. Guide specifications for fatigue evaluation of existing steel bridges. Washington, DC: AASHTO.
AISC. 2010. Specification for structural steel buildings. Chicago: AISC.
Aygül, M., M. Al-Emrani, and S. Urushadze. 2012. “Modelling and fatigue life assessment of orthotropic bridge deck details using FEM.” Int. J. Fatigue 40 (7): 129–142. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2011.12.015.
Cao, B. Y., Y. L. Ding, Y. S. Song, and W. Zhong. 2019. “Fatigue life evaluation for deck-rib welding details of orthotropic steel deck integrating mean stress effects.” J. Bridge Eng. 24 (2): 04018114. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0001344.
Cao, V. D., E. Sasaki, K. Tajima, and T. Suzuki. 2015. “Investigations on the effect of weld penetration on fatigue strength of rib-to-deck welded joints in orthotropic steel decks.” Int. J. Steel Struct. 15 (2): 299–310. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13296-014-1103-4.
CEN (European Committee for Standardization). 1992. Eurocode 3: Design of steel structures, part 1–9: Fatigue. Brussels, Belgium: CEN.
Cui, C., Y. Z. Bu, Q. H. Zhang, and L. J. Li. 2014. “Fatigue life assessment of orthotropic steel deck plate based on hot spot stress method.” [In Chinese.] Bridge Constr. 44 (4): 62–67.
De Jong, F. 2006. “Renovation techniques for fatigue cracked orthotropic steel bridge decks.” Ph.D. thesis, Dept. of Civil Engineering and Geosciences, Delft Univ. of Technology.
Ding, Y. L., Y. S. Song, B. Y. Cao, G. X. Wang, and A. Q. Li. 2016. “Full-range S-N fatigue-life evaluation method for welded bridge structures considering hot-spot and welding residual stress.” J. Bridge Eng. 21 (12): 04016096. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0000969.
Fisher, J., and J. Barsom. 2016. “Evaluation of cracking in the rib-to-deck welds of the Bronx–Whitestone bridge.” J. Bridge Eng. 21 (3): 04015065. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0000823.
Fricke, W. 2012. IIW recommendations for the fatigue assessment of welded structures by notch stress analysis. Cambridge, UK: Woodhead Publishing.
Fu, Z., B. Ji, Z. Ye, and Y. Wang. 2017. “Fatigue evaluation of cable-stayed bridge steel deck based on predicted traffic flow growth.” KSCE J. Civ. Eng. 21 (4): 1400–1409. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12205-016-1033-0.
IIW (International Institute of Welding). 2007. Recommendations for fatigue design of welded joints and components. Paris: IIW.
Lee, J. M., J. K. Seo, M. H. Kim, S. B. Shin, M. S. Han, J. S. Park, and M. Mahendran. 2010. “Comparison of hot spot stress evaluation methods for welded structures.” Int. J. Nav. Archit. Ocean Eng. 2 (4): 200–210. https://doi.org/10.2478/IJNAOE-2013-0037.
Liu, R., Y. Liu, B. Ji, M. Wang, and Y. Tian. 2014. “Hot spot stress analysis on rib-deck welded joint in orthotropic steel decks.” J. Constr. Steel Res. 97 (2): 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2014.01.012.
MOTPRC (Ministry of Transport of the People’s Republic of China). 2015. Highway steel bridge design code. [In Chinese.] Beijing: China Architecture & Building Press.
Radaj, D., C. M. Sonsino, and W. Fricke. 2006. Fatigue assessment of welded joints by local approaches. 2nd ed. Cambridge, UK: Woodhead Publishing.
Sim, H. B., and C. M. Uang. 2012. “Stress analyses and parametric study on full-scale fatigue tests of rib-to-deck welded joints in steel orthotropic decks.” J. Bridge Eng. 17 (5): 765–773. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0000307.
Tang, L., L. J. Huang, G. Liu, C. S. Wang, and B. N. Fu. 2014. “Fatigue experimental study of a full-scale steel orthotropic deck model.” [In Chinese.] China Civ. Eng. J. 47 (3): 112–122.
Thompson, M. K., and J. M. Thompson. 2017. “Butterworth-Heinemann.” In ANSYS mechanical APDL for finite element analysis. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Wang, B. 2015. “Fatigue assessment of the diaphragm-to-rib welded connection in orthotropic steel deck using effective notch stress approach.” J. Fail. Anal. Prev. 15 (1): 65–73. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11668-014-9909-0.
Xiao, Z. G., K. Yamada, S. Ya, and X. L. Zhao. 2008. “Stress analyses and fatigue evaluation of rib-to-deck joints in steel orthotropic decks.” Int. J. Fatigue 30 (8): 1387–1397. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2007.10.008.
Ya, S., K. Yamada, and T. Ishikawa. 2011. “Fatigue evaluation of rib-to-deck welded joints of orthotropic steel bridge deck.” J. Bridge Eng. 16 (4): 492–499. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0000181.
Zhang, Q. H., C. Cui, Y. Z. Bu, Y. M. Liu, and H. W. Ye. 2015. “Fatigue tests and fatigue assessment approaches for rib-to-diaphragm in steel orthotropic decks.” J. Constr. Steel Res. 114: 110–118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2015.07.014.
Zhao, X. X. 2010. “Research on fatigue design parameter and structural details for orthotropic deck.” [In Chinese.] Ph.D. thesis, Dept. of Railway Engineering, China Academy of Railway Sciences.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities
Volume 35 • Issue 3 • June 2021
Copyright
© 2021 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: Jan 29, 2019
Accepted: Dec 23, 2020
Published online: Apr 10, 2021
Published in print: Jun 1, 2021
Discussion open until: Sep 10, 2021
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.