Identifying Characteristics of Bridges Vulnerable to Hydraulic Hazards Using Bridge Failure Data
Publication: Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities
Volume 34, Issue 6
Abstract
Hydraulic failure, which encompasses scour, flooding, and overtopping, accounts for most bridge failures in the United States. The research reported herein aimed to evaluate the current practice of bridge hydraulic vulnerability assessment, and to identify characteristics of bridges most prone to hydraulic failure using a historical bridge failure database. Using an inductive, data-driven approach, a bridge failure population was created by synthesizing the National Bridge Inventory (NBI), United States Geological Survey (USGS) station streamflow, and available bridge failure data. Many failures that occurred before mid-2000 had incomplete assessments; this reflected the low share of structures with completed assessments in NBI. In subsequent years, state bridge inventories had completed assessments and hydraulic failures had significantly lower scour critical ratings, which indicated an improvement in identifying structures most vulnerable to failure. The most common bridge types within the overall inventory were generally overrepresented within the bridge failure population (especially those used before the Interstate Era). Differences in structure age, geometry, and condition ratings were most noticeable between failures and the overall waterway bridge inventory. Bridge deck width was narrower for failures and might explain a mechanistic cause of hydraulic failure. Waterway bridges built prior to the Interstate Era resemble those that have historically failed in that era. However, failures of bridges constructed within the Interstate Era did not resemble current waterway structures built in the same time period.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
Data Availability Statement
Some or all data, models, or code used during the study were provided by a third party. Direct requests for these materials may be made to the provider as indicated in the Acknowledgments.
Acknowledgments
This research was conducted by a student sponsored by the Rutgers Coastal Climate Risk and Resilience (C2R2) Program, a fellowship supported by the National Science Foundation (NSF) Grant No. 1633557. Special thanks to Sreenivas Alampalli from NYSDOT for communication and the use of the bridge failure data set.
References
AASHTO. 2012. Hydraulic engineering circular No. 18: Evaluating scour at bridges. 5th ed. Washington, DC: AASHTO.
Cook, W., P. J. Barr, and M. W. Halling. 2015. “Bridge failure rate.” J. Perform. Constr. Facil. 29 (3): 04014080. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CF.1943-5509.0000571.
FHWA (Federal Highway Administration). 2001. ACTION: Revision of coding guide, item 113—Scour critical bridges. Washington, DC: FHWA.
FHWA (Federal Highway Administration). 2006. ACTION: Compliance with the national bridge inspection standards—Background/plan of action for scour critical bridges/scour focus states/item 113 coding issues/unknown foundations/tidal bridges. Washington, DC: FHWA.
FHWA (Federal Highway Administration). 2010. Drilled shafts: Construction procedures and LFRD design methods. Washington, DC: FHWA.
Harik, I. E., A. M. Shaaban, H. Gesund, G. Y. Valli, and S. T. Wang. 1990. “United States bridge failures, 1951–1988.” J. Perform. Constr. Facil. 4 (4): 272–277. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0887-3828(1990)4:4(272).
NCHRP (National Cooperative Highway Research Program). 2005. “A context for common historic bridges types.”. Washington, DC: NCHRP. http://onlinepubs.trb.org/onlinepubs/archive/NotesDocs/25-25(15)_FR.pdf.
Neumann, J. E., et al. 2015. “Climate change risks to US infrastructure: Impacts on roads, bridges, coastal development, and urban drainage.” Clim. Change 131 (1): 97. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-013-1037-4.
Wardhana, K., and F. C. Hardipriono. 2003. “Analysis of recent bridge failures in the United States.” J. Perform. Constr. Facil. 17 (3): 144–150. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0887-3828(2003)17:3(144).
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
© 2020 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: Jan 31, 2020
Accepted: Jun 2, 2020
Published online: Aug 29, 2020
Published in print: Dec 1, 2020
Discussion open until: Jan 29, 2021
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.