Abstract

This study investigates full-depth deck cracks observed on a skewed bridge, which was constructed using self-propelled modular transporters (SPMTs). To investigate the causes, three main factors associated with structural design, material design, and construction are reviewed. Specifically, the bridge performance under thermal and construction loading is investigated by conducting a nonlinear finite-element analysis. The analysis parameters include bridge deck geometry, boundary conditions, bearing details, and skew angles. The loading conditions mainly include thermal and differential deck movements induced during an SPMT move. The results are compared to a crack map created from two site visits. It is concluded that skewed decks are more susceptible to cracking than straight decks due to an asymmetric expansion and contraction. Additionally, semi-integral abutment designs in a skewed bridge increase the extent of cracking in the skewed corners of the abutment ends. It is recommended that a semi-integral abutment design be carefully considered when designing a skewed bridge and that bearing and expansion joint details need careful attention for accelerated bridge construction.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

All photos, construction drawings, FEA models, and analysis output data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Acknowledgments

The study presented in this paper was conducted by the University of Georgia under the auspices of the Georgia Department of Transportation (GDOT) (RP 17-29). The authors extend our sincere appreciation to the GDOT research staff, Innovative Delivery/P3 division, materials and testing office staff, and bridge engineers. The opinions, findings, and conclusions may not reflect the views of the funding agency or other individuals.

References

Anusreebai, S., and V. Krishnachandran. 2016. “Effect of reinforcement pattern on the behaviour of skew slab.” Int. Res. J. Eng. Technol. 3 (8): 1879–1885.
Caltrans. 2015. Bridge design practice. Sacramento, CA: California Dept. of Transportation.
CDOT (Colorado Department of Transportation). 2018. CDOT bridge design manual. Denver: CDOT.
Chnar, S. 2019. “Field and nonlinear finite element model based investigations of skewed bridges constructed using accelerated bridge construction.” M.S. thesis, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Univ. of Georgia.
Chorzepa, M. G., S. Chnar, S. A. Durham, and S. S. Kim. 2019. Development of possible solutions to eliminate or reduce deck cracking on skewed bridges built by using the accelerated bridge construction method. Atlanta: Georgia DOT.
CTDOT (Connecticut DOT). 2019. Bridge design manual. Newington, CT: CTDOT.
Deng, Y., B. M. Phares, L. Greimann, G. L. Shryack, and J. J. Hoffman. 2015. “Behavior of curved and skewed bridges with integral abutments.” J. Constr. Steel Res. 109 (Jun): 115–136. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2015.03.003.
DIANA FEABV. 2017. DIANA finite element analysis user’s manual release, 10.3. Delft, Netherlands: DIANA FEA BV.
ElSafty, A., and A. Abdel-Mohti. 2013. “Investigation of likelihood of cracking in reinforced concrete bridge decks.” Int. J. Concr. Struct. Mater. 7 (1): 79–93. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40069-013-0034-3.
FHWA (Federal Highway Administration). 2011. Accelerated bridge construction manual. Washington, DC: FHWA.
FHWA (Federal Highway Administration). 2014. Slide-in bridge construction. Washington, DC: FHWA.
FHWA (Federal Highway Administration). 2017. Deficient bridges by highway system 2017. Washington, DC: FHWA.
fib. 2013. fib model code for concrete structures 2010. New York: Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/9783433604090.
French, C., L. Eppers, Q. Le, and J. F. Hajjar. 1999. “Transverse cracking in concrete bridge decks.” Transp. Res. Rec. 1688 (1): 21–29. https://doi.org/10.3141/1688-03.
Fu, G., J. Feng, J. Dimaria, and Y. Zhuang. 2007. Bridge deck cracking on skewed bridge structures. Detroit, MI: Wayne State Univ.
Fu, G., Y. Zhuang, and J. Feng. 2011. “Behavior of reinforced concrete bridge decks on skewed steel superstructure under truck wheel loads.” J. Bridge Eng. 16 (2): 219–225. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0000142.
Hopper, T., A. Manafpour, A. Radlińska, G. Warn, F. Rajabipour, D. Morian, and S. Jahangirnejad. 2015. Bridge deck cracking: Effects on in-service performance, prevention, and remediation. Harrisburg, PA: Pennsylvania DOT.
Imbsen, R., D. Vandershaf, R. Schamber, and R. Nutt. 1985. Thermal effects in concrete bridge superstructures. NCHRP Rep. No. 276. Washington, DC: Transportation Research Board.
Iowa DOT. 2014. Bridge maintenance manual. Ames, IA: Iowa DOT.
Karunarathne, A., W. Mampearachchi, and A. Nanayakkara. 2010. Modelling of thermal effects due to solar radiation on concrete pavements. Moratuwa, Sri Lanka: Univ. of Moratuwa.
Krauss, P., and E. Rogalla. 1996. Transverse cracking in newly constructed bridge decks. Washington, DC: Transportation Research Board.
Leonhardt, F. 1988. “Cracks and crack control in concrete structures.” PCI J. 33 (4): 124–145. https://doi.org/10.15554/pcij.07011988.124.145.
Ma, F., and A. Kwan. 2017. “Finite element analysis of concrete shrinkage cracks.” Adv. Struct. Eng. 21 (10): 1454–1468. https://doi.org/10.1177/1369433217746346.
Marx, H. J., N. Khachaturian, and W. L. Gamble. 1991. “Design criteria for right and skew slab-and-girder bridges.” Transp. Res. Rec. 1319 (1): 72–85.
Menassa, C., M. Mabsout, K. Tarhini, and G. Frederick. 2007. “Influence of skew angle on reinforced concrete slab bridges.” J. Bridge Eng. 12 (2): 205–214. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0702(2007)12:2(205).
Rajagopalan, N. 2006. Bridge superstructure. Chennai, India: Alpha Science International.
Russell, H. 2017. Control of concrete cracking in bridges. Washington, DC: Transportation Research Board.
Sadeghian, V., and F. J. Vecchio. 2018. “The modified compression field theory: Then and now.” ACI Struct. J. Spec. Pub. 328 (S3): 1–20.
Schindler, A. K., M. L. Hughes, R. W. Barnes, and B. E. Byard. 2010. Evaluation of cracking of the US 331 bridge deck. Auburn, AL: Auburn Univ.
Sindhu, B., K. Ashwin, J. Dattatreya, and D. Sv. 2013. “Effect of skew angle on static behavior of reinforced concrete slab bridge decks.” Int. J. Res. Eng. Technol. 2 (1): 50–58. https://doi.org/10.15623/ijret.2013.0213010.
So, M., T. G. Harmon, S. Dyke, and G. J. Yun. 2009. “Inclusion of smeared cyclic bond-slip behavior in two-dimensional membrane elements.” ACI Struct. J. 106 (4): 466–475. https://doi.org/10.14359/56612.
Texas DOT. 2018. Bridge design manual-LRFD. Austin, TX: Texas DOT.
Wan, B. 2010. What’s causing cracking in new bridge decks?. Madison, WI: Wisconsin DOT.
Wang, Y.-h., Y.-s. Zou, C.-j. Li, L.-q. Xu, and S.-c. Wang. 2015. “Analytical methods for temperature field and temperature stress of column pier under solar radiation.” Math. Prob. Eng. 2015: 8. https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/278072.
White, H. 2007. Integral abutment bridges: Comparison of current practice between European countries and the United States of America. Albany, NY: New York DOT.
WSDOT (Washington State DOT). 2019. Bridge design manual. Olympia, WA: WSDOT.
Zhuang, Y., G. Fu, T. Ji, and B. Chen. 2011. “FEA of deck corner cracking on skewed bridge structures.” In Vol. 255 of Advanced materials research, 1240–1243. Stafa-Zurich, Switzerland: Trans Tech Publications.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities
Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities
Volume 34Issue 5October 2020

History

Received: Feb 3, 2020
Accepted: May 29, 2020
Published online: Jul 31, 2020
Published in print: Oct 1, 2020
Discussion open until: Dec 31, 2020

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Graduate Student, Dept. of Civil Engineering, College of Engineering, Univ. of Georgia, Athens, GA 30602. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7206-6768. Email: [email protected]
Associate Professor, Dept. of Civil Engineering, College of Engineering, Univ. of Georgia, 597 D.W. Brooks Dr., Athens, GA 30602 (corresponding author). ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7259-3165. Email: [email protected]
Professor, Dept. of Civil Engineering, College of Engineering, Univ. of Georgia, 597 D.W. Brooks Dr., Athens, GA 30602. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6177-3491. Email: [email protected]
Associate Professor, Dept. of Civil Engineering, College of Engineering, Univ. of Georgia, 597 D.W. Brooks Dr., Athens, GA 30602. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3468-0230. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share