Technical Papers
Jun 19, 2020

Simple Procedure for Load Rating Reinforced Concrete Slab Bridges without Plans

Publication: Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities
Volume 34, Issue 5

Abstract

In New Mexico, bridges without plans are currently an issue as in other states in the US. Standard techniques cannot be used for load rating due to the lack of design plans that contain necessary information such as material properties and the amount and location of mild steel reinforcement. In this study, state departments of transportation were surveyed regarding their load rating policies and procedures for planless bridges. Many states reported a significant number of bridges without plans, in particular reinforced concrete bridges, and the rating approaches for such bridges vary from state to state. This project was conducted for the New Mexico Department of Transportation (NMDOT) to develop an effective method to load rate reinforced concrete slab bridges without plans and obtain more representative estimates of load-carrying capacity. In New Mexico, 46 reinforced concrete slab bridges (simple and continuous span) were load rated and evaluated using simple analytical and nondestructive testing techniques. The procedure includes field measurements of the bridge dimensions and geometry, Windsor Probe testing of the concrete strength, scanning of the embedded steel reinforcement, generation of the as-built drawings, and modeling the bridge with a load rating software. The procedure provided the NMDOT with as-built plans as well as more realistic load rating results for their reinforced concrete slab bridges without design plans. The rating results for the 46 New Mexico bridges are presented in this paper and comparisons are made with other state policies to illustrate the differences in the load ratings.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

Some or all data, models, or code generated or used during the study are available from the corresponding author by request and upon approval from the New Mexico Department of Transportation:
Windsor Probe testing data
Hilti Ferroscan data
AutoCAD as-builts
BrR models

References

AASHTO. 2002. Standard specifications for highway bridges. 17th ed. Washington, DC: AASHTO.
AASHTO. 2011. Manual for bridge evaluation. 2nd ed. Washington, DC: AASHTO.
Aguilar, C. V., D. V. Jáuregui, C. M. Newtson, B. D. Weldon, and T. M. Cortez. 2015. “Load rating a prestressed concrete double-tee beam bridge without plans by field testing.” Transp. Res. Rec. 2522 (1): 90–99. https://doi.org/10.3141/2522-09.
Aguilar, C. V., D. V. Jáuregui, B. D. Weldon, and C. M. Newtson. 2017. “Rating of prestressed concrete adjacent beam bridges without plans.” In Proc., Appearing in ACI Special Publication 323, 5.1–5.20. Farmington Hills, MI: American Concrete Institute.
Alyamac, K. E., T. A. S. Yavuzhan, Z. C. Ulucan, and M. A. Ulas. 2017. “Estimation of concrete strength combining rebound hammer and Windsor probe test methods.” In Proc., 4th Conf. Smart Monitoring, Assessment and Rehabilitation of Civil Structures. Zurich, Switzerland: International Society for Structural Health Monitoring of Intelligent Infrastructure; International Institute of FRP in Construction; and International Union of Laboratories and Experts in Construction Materials, Systems and Structures.
Armendariz, R. R., and M. D. Bowman. 2018. Bridge load rating. West Lafayette, IN: Purdue Univ.
ASTM. 2010. Standard test method for penetration resistance of hardened concrete. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM.
Bagheri, A., M. Alipour, O. E. Ozbulut, and D. K. Harris. 2018. “A nondestructive method for load rating of bridges without structural properties and plans.” Eng. Struct. 171 (Sep): 545–556. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2018.05.114.
Bridges with Unknown Structural Components. 2013. Idaho manual for bridge evaluation, section 6.1.4. Boise, Idaho: Idaho DOT.
Chynoweth, M. J., and Michigan Department of Transportation. 2014. Load rating bridges with no as-built plans questionnaire. Las Cruces, NM: New Mexico State Univ.
Eitel, A., A. Huckelbridge, and N. Capaldi. 2002. Development of a load test for the evaluation and rating of short-span reinforced concrete slab bridges. Cleveland: Federal Highway Administration-Ohio Dept. of Transportation, Case Western Reserve Univ.
Hilti Corporation. 2012. Hilti PS250/200-S. Munich, Germany: Hilti Corporation.
Huang, J. 2007. “Evaluating bridge performance: Load rating bridges without plans and experimental displacement influence lines.” Ph.D. dissertation, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of Delaware.
Huang, J., and H. W. Shenton. 2010. “Load rating concrete bridge without plans.” In Proc., Structures Congress. Newark, Delaware: ASCE, Univ. of Delaware.
Jáuregui, D. V., C. M. Newtson, B. D. Weldon, C. V. Aguilar, T. M. Cortez, D. D. Shikurye, and Y. Ouyang. 2015. Load rating bridges with no as-built plans or non-engineered bridges. Santa Fe, NM: New Mexico Dept. of Transportation.
Jáuregui, D. V., B. D. Weldon, and C. V. Aguilar. 2019. “Load rating of prestressed concrete bridges without design plans by nondestructive field testing.” Chap. 2 in Vol. 13 of Load testing of bridges: Proof load testing and the future of load testing, Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
MoDOT (Maryland Department of Transportation). 1994. Live load distribution factors and load testing. Jefferson City, MI: MoDOT.
MoDOT (Maryland Department of Transportation). 2014. Load rating bridges with no as-built plans questionnaire. Las Cruces, NM: New Mexico State Univ.
Nucera, F., and R. Pucinotti. 2009. “Destructive and non-destructive testing on reinforced concrete structure: The case study of the museum of magna graecia in reggio calabria.” In Proc., 39th Int. Conf. and Exhibition, 143–150. Germany: Defektoskopie, NDT.
ODOT (Oregon Department of Transportation). 2013. ODOT LRFR manual, section 8. Salem, OR: ODOT.
Potter, W., and Florida Department of Transportation. 2014. Load rating bridges with no as-built plans questionnaire. Las Cruces, NM: New Mexico State Univ.
Riley, G. 2003. “Rebar locators.” Accessed November 15, 2018. https://www.structuremag.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/10/SF-RebarLocators1.pdf.
Subedi, S. K. 2016. “Load rating of flat slab bridges without plans.” Ph.D. dissertation, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Youngstown State Univ.
Taylor, Z., O. Amini, and J. W. van de Lindt. 2011. Approach for establishing approximate load carrying capacity for bridges with unknown design properties. Fort Collins, CO: Colorado State Univ.
Texas Department of Transportation. 2014. Load rating bridges with no as-built plans questionnaire. Las Cruces, NM: New Mexico State Univ.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities
Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities
Volume 34Issue 5October 2020

History

Received: Feb 22, 2019
Accepted: Feb 18, 2020
Published online: Jun 19, 2020
Published in print: Oct 1, 2020
Discussion open until: Nov 19, 2020

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Ph.D. Student, Dept. of Civil Engineering, New Mexico State Univ., Hernandez Hall, 3035 S. Espina St., Las Cruces, NM 88003 (corresponding author). ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6198-4088. Email: [email protected]
P.E.
Professor, Dept. of Civil Engineering, New Mexico State Univ., Hernandez Hall, 3035 S. Espina St., Las Cruces, NM 88003. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5458-2577. Email: [email protected]
Brad D. Weldon, Ph.D. [email protected]
Associate Professor, Dept. of Civil Engineering, New Mexico State Univ., Hernandez Hall, 3035 S. Espina St., Las Cruces, NM 88003. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share