Technical Papers
Apr 29, 2020

Structural Failure Evaluation of a Substandard RC Building due to Basement Story Short-Column Damage

Publication: Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities
Volume 34, Issue 4

Abstract

A vast majority of existing substandard reinforced concrete (RC)-framed buildings are prone to seismic damage because of improper design and construction applications as well as poor material properties. In this study, field investigation and analytical research have been conducted for adjacent buildings, which were exposed to an earthquake with a magnitude of 5.0 occurred in Çiçekdağı/Kırşehir/Turkey on January 10, 2016. A building with a basement story was severely damaged following the earthquake and collapsed eight days after the main shock whereas the other building with no basement did not experience significant damage and survived. Except for the presence of the basement in the collapsed building, both buildings have the same structural system and material properties. To let in daylight, ribbon windows were constructed on the partial infill walls adjacent to some of the columns at the basement story level, which resulted in the short-column phenomenon in the collapsed building. Material tests were conducted on the concrete and reinforcing steel samples taken from the collapsed building to determine their mechanical properties. Then, analytical models of both buildings with masonry infill walls were generated based on the information obtained from the site observations, the blueprints of the buildings and the results of material tests. Nonlinear static pushover analyses were performed to obtain the capacity curves of the buildings. Analyses results showed that the formation of short-column damage, which was visually observed in the field, in the basement because of imposed excessive shear demand was found to be the main reason for the total collapse as well as the high axial load level of columns.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

All data, models, generated or used during the study are available from the corresponding author by request (contact email: [email protected]). List of items that can be provided: analytical models of both buildings in SeismoStruct, Excel sheets developed for material test results and evaluation of nonlinear static analysis results, and other data or results presented in the research.

References

Akcay, B. 2004. “Variation of in-place concrete core strength in structures from Istanbul area: Statistical analysis of concrete core data.” J. Mater. Civ. Eng. 16 (5): 507–510. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0899-1561(2004)16:5(507).
Akin, E. 2018. “Effects of various parameters on nonlinear dynamic response of infilled RC buildings with open ground story.” In Proc., 16th European Conf. on Earthquake Engineering. Istanbul, Turkey: European Association for Earthquake Engineering.
ASTM. 2004. Standard test method for obtaining and testing drilled cores and sawed beams of concrete. ASTM C42. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM.
ASTM. 2016. Standard test methods for tension testing of metallic materials. ASTM E8/E8M. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM.
ASTM. 2018. Standard test method for compressive strength of cylindrical concrete specimens: C09. 61. ASTM C39/C39M. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM.
Augenti, N., and F. Parisi. 2010. “Learning from construction failures due to the 2009 L’Aquila, Italy, earthquake.” J. Perform. Constr. Facil. 24 (6): 536–555. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CF.1943-5509.0000122.
Avşar, Ö., and O. Tunaboyu. 2014. “Influence of structural walls on the seismic performance of RC buildings during the May 19, 2011 Simav Earthquake in Turkey.” J. Perform. Constr. Facil. 28 (4): 04014016. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CF.1943-5509.0000473.
Bakirci Er, S., S. Aykac, and H. Can. 2014. “Behaviour of reinforced concrete weak column-beam connections.” J. Faculty Eng. Archit. Gazi Univ. 29 (3): 537–547. https://doi.org/10.17341/gummfd.02807.
Bal, İ. E., H. Crowley, R. Pinho, and F. G. Gülay. 2008. “Detailed assessment of structural characteristics of Turkish RC building stock for loss assessment models.” Soil Dyn. Earthquake Eng. 28 (10–11): 914–932. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2007.10.005.
Çağatay, İ. H. 2005. “Experimental evaluation of buildings damaged in recent earthquakes in Turkey.” Eng. Fail. Anal. 12 (3): 440–452. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfailanal.2004.02.007.
Crisafulli, F. J. 1997. “Seismic behaviour of reinforced concrete structures with masonry infills.” Ph.D. thesis, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Univ. of Canterbury.
Decanini, L. D., L. Liberatore, and F. Mollaioli. 2014. “Strength and stiffness reduction factors for infilled frames with openings.” Earthquake Eng. Eng. Vib. 13 (3): 437–454. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11803-014-0254-9.
DEMP (Disaster and Emergency Management Presidency), Prime Ministry, Republic of Turkey. 2016. “Disaster and Emergency Management Presidency website.” Accessed June 1, 2016. http://www.deprem.gov.tr.
Dolšek, M., and P. Fajfar. 2008. “The effect of masonry infills on the seismic response of a four-storey reinforced concrete frame—a deterministic assessment.” Eng. Struct. 30 (7): 1991–2001. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2008.01.001.
Duran, B., O. Tunaboyu, and O. Avsar. 2017. “Determination of elasticity modulus of low strength concrete and its effect on the risk assessment results by DSVB.” J. Faculty Eng. Archit. Gazi Univ. 32 (1): 253–264. https://doi.org/10.17341/gazimmfd.300617.
Duran, B., O. Tunaboyu, O. Kaplan, and O. Avsar. 2018. “Effectiveness of seismic repairing stages with CFRPs on the seismic performance of damaged RC frames.” Struct. Eng. Mech. 67 (3): 233–244. https://doi.org/10.12989/sem.2018.67.3.233.
Ergun, A., N. Kıraç, and V. Başaran. 2015. “The evaluation of structural properties of reinforced concrete building designed according to pre-modern code considering seismic performance.” Eng. Fail. Anal. 58 (Part 1): 184–191. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfailanal.2015.09.003.
FEMA (Federal Emergency Management Agency). 2000. Commentary for the seismic rehabilitation of buildings. FEMA-356. Washington, DC: FEMA.
Furtado, A., H. Rodrigues, A. Arêde, H. Varum, M. Grubišić, and T. K. Šipoš. 2018. “Prediction of the earthquake response of a three-storey infilled RC structure.” Eng. Struct. 171 (Sep): 214–235. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2018.05.054.
Furtado, A., H. Rodrigues, H. Varum, and A. Costa. 2017. “Evaluation of different strengthening techniques’ efficiency for a soft storey building.” Eur. J. Environ. Civ. Eng. 21 (4): 371–388. https://doi.org/10.1080/19648189.2015.1119064.
Garcia, R., I. Hajirasouliha, and K. Pilakoutas. 2010. “Seismic behaviour of deficient RC frames strengthened with CFRP composites.” Eng. Struct. 32 (10): 3075–3085. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2010.05.026.
Guevara, L. T., and L. E. Garcia. 2005. “The captive and short-column effects.” Earthquake Spectra 21 (1): 141–160. https://doi.org/10.1193/1.1856533.
Mander, J. B., M. J. N. Priestley, and R. Park. 1988. “Theoretical stress-strain model for confined concrete.” J. Struct. Eng. 114 (8): 1804–1826. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1988)114:8(1804).
Menegotto M., and P. E. Pinto. 1973. “Method of analysis for cyclically loaded RC plane frames including changes in geometry and non-elastic behaviour of elements under combined normal force and bending.” In Proc., Symp. on the Resistance and Ultimate Deformability of Structures Acted on by Well Defined Repeated Loads, International Association for Bridge and Structural Engineering, 15–22. Zurich, Switzerland: International Association for Bridge and Structural Engineering.
Mosleh, A., H. Rodrigues, H. Varum, A. Costa, and A. Arêde. 2016. “Seismic behavior of RC building structures designed according to current codes.” In Vol. 7 of Structures, 1–13. Amsterdam, Netherlands: Elsevier.
O’Reilly, G. J., and T. J. Sullivan. 2018a. “Probabilistic seismic assessment and retrofit considerations for Italian RC frame buildings.” Bull. Earthquake Eng. 16 (3): 1447–1485. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-017-0257-9.
O’Reilly, G. J., and T. J. Sullivan. 2018b. “Quantification of modelling uncertainty in existing Italian RC frames.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn. 47 (4): 1054–1074. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.3005.
Prota, A., F. De Cicco, and E. Cosenza. 2009. “Cyclic behavior of smooth steel reinforcing bars: Experimental analysis and modeling issues.” J. Earthquake Eng. 13 (4): 500–519. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632460902837686.
Razzaghi, M. S., and M. Javidnia. 2015. “Evaluation of the effect of infill walls on seismic performance of RC dual frames.” Int. J. Adv. Struct. Eng. 7 (1): 49–54. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40091-015-0081-x.
Ricci, P., F. De Luca, and G. M. Verderame. 2011. “6th April 2009 L’Aquila earthquake, Italy: Reinforced concrete building performance.” Bull. Earthquake Eng. 9 (1): 285–305. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-010-9204-8.
Sattar, S., and A. B. Liel. 2016. “Seismic performance of nonductile reinforced concrete frames with masonry infill walls—II: Collapse assessment.” Earthquake Spectra 32 (2): 819–842. https://doi.org/10.1193/091514EQS141M.
Sezen, H., A. S. Whittaker, K. J. Elwood, and K. M. Mosalam. 2003. “Performance of reinforced concrete buildings during the August 17, 1999 Kocaeli, Turkey earthquake, and seismic design and construction practice in Turkey.” Eng. Struct. 25 (1): 103–114. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0141-0296(02)00121-9.
Tapan, M., M. Comert, C. Demir, Y. Sayan, K. Orakcal, and A. Ilki. 2013. “Failures of structures during the October 23, 2011 Tabanlı (Van) and November 9, 2011 Edremit (Van) earthquakes in Turkey.” Eng. Fail. Anal. 34 (Dec): 606–628. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfailanal.2013.02.013.
TBEC (Turkish Building Earthquake Code). 2018. Specification for buildings to be built in seismic zones. Ankara, Turkey: Disaster and Emergency Management Presidency, Government of Republic of Turkey.
TEC (Turkish Earthquake Code). 1975. Specifications for structures to be built in disaster area, Ministry of Public Works and Settlement. Ankara, Turkey: Government of Republic of Turkey.
TEC (Turkish Earthquake Code). 2007. Specification for buildings to be built in seismic zones, Ministry of Public Works and Settlement. Ankara, Turkey: Government of Republic of Turkey.
Temiz, U., and Y. E. Gökten. 2016. “10 January 2016 Hacıduraklı-Çiçekdağı (Kırşehir) Earthquake (Mw= 5.0); implications about related structures and tectonic environment, Central Anatolia–Turkey.” Geol. Bull. Turkey 59 (2): 155–166.
Tunaboyu, O., and Ö. Avşar. 2017. “Seismic repair of captive-column damage with CFRPs in substandard RC frames.” Struct. Eng. Mech. 61 (1): 1–13. https://doi.org/10.12989/sem.2017.61.1.001.
Turkish Standardization Institute. 2000. Requirements for design and construction of reinforced concrete structures. TS500. Ankara, Turkey: Turkish Standardization Institute.
Ulrich, T., C. Negulescu, E. Foerster, H. Modaressi, and S. Auclair. 2011. “Comparison of different numerical methodologies to derive fragility curves of RC buildings with soil-structure interactions.” In Proc., 8th Int. Conf. on Structural Dynamics, EURODYN 2011. Leuven, Belgium: Katholike universiteit Leuven.
Varum, H., A. Furtado, H. Rodrigues, J. Dias-Oliveira, N. Vila-Pouca, and A. Arêde. 2017. “Seismic performance of the infill masonry walls and ambient vibration tests after the Ghorka 2015, Nepal earthquake.” Bull. Earthquake Eng. 15 (3): 1185–1212. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-016-9999-z.
Yılmaz, N., and Ö. Avşar. 2013. “Structural damages of the May 19, 2011, Kütahya–Simav earthquake in Turkey.” Nat. Hazards 69 (1): 981–1001. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-013-0747-2.
Yurdakul, Ö., and Ö. Avşar. 2016. “Strengthening of substandard reinforced concrete beam-column joints by external post-tension rods.” Eng. Struct. 107 (Jan): 9–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2015.11.004.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities
Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities
Volume 34Issue 4August 2020

History

Received: Jun 28, 2019
Accepted: Jan 13, 2020
Published online: Apr 29, 2020
Published in print: Aug 1, 2020
Discussion open until: Sep 29, 2020

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Graduate Student, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Dokuz Eylul Univ., Izmir 35190, Turkey (corresponding author). ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0352-2456. Email: [email protected]
Onur Tunaboyu, Ph.D. [email protected]
Assistant Professor, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Eskisehir Technical Univ., Eskişehir 26555, Turkey. Email: [email protected]
Özgür Avşar, Ph.D. [email protected]
Professor, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Eskisehir Technical Univ., Eskişehir 26555, Turkey. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share