Technical Papers
Mar 28, 2020

Effectiveness and Implications of Seismic Retrofit Measures for Deck Unseating of Multiframe Bridges with Regular and Irregular Geometry

Publication: Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities
Volume 34, Issue 3

Abstract

Deck unseating at abutments and in-span hinges can be a major cause of collapse, especially for older multiframe bridges that are not in compliance with the latest code provisions for seat lengths. This study investigated the effectiveness and implications of using two common retrofit measures to reduce or eliminate deck unseating risks: restrainer cables, and shear keys. A combination of restrainer cables and shear keys at the abutments and the in-span hinge was proposed and investigated as a potential retrofit measure to limit excessive movement of decks and eliminate unseating risks of older multiframe RC bridges with regular and irregular geometry. Six four-span multiframe bridge configurations were considered: straight, skewed, and curved bridges, with equal and unequal pier heights. Detailed finite-element models for all configurations were developed to conduct nonlinear time history analysis (NTHA) under five different ground motions representing weak, moderate, and strong earthquake scenarios. The average of the NTHA results showed that the combination of restrainer cables and shear keys is more effective than using individual measures to reduce displacement demands for irregular bridge configurations, in which coupling between the response in the longitudinal and transverse directions is more pronounced.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

References

AASHTO. 1998. LRFD bridge design specifications. Washington, DC: AASHTO.
Abbasi, M., M. J. Abedini, B. Zakeri, and G. Ghodrati Amiri. 2016. “Seismic vulnerability assessment of a Californian multi-frame curved concrete box girder viaduct using fragility curves.” Struct. Infrastruct. Eng. 12 (12): 1585–1601.
Abbasi, M., and M. A. Moustafa. 2017. “Effect of shear keys on seismic response of irregular bridge configurations.” Transp. Res. Rec. 2642 (1): 155–165. https://doi.org/10.3141/2642-17.
Abbasi, M., and M. A. Moustafa. 2019a. “Effect of damping modeling and characteristics on seismic vulnerability assessment of multi-frame bridges.” J. Earthquake Eng. 7 (Apr): 1–28. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632469.2019.1592791.
Abbasi, M., and M. A. Moustafa. 2019b. “Probabilistic seismic assessment of as-built and retrofitted old and newly designed skewed multi-frame bridges.” Soil Dyn. Earthquake Eng. 119: 170–186.
Abbasi, M., and M. A. Moustafa. 2019c. “Time-dependent seismic fragilities of older and newly designed multiframe reinforced concrete box-girder bridges in California.” Earthquake Spectra. 35 (1): 233–266. https://doi.org/10.1193/102317EQS220M.
Abbasi, M., B. Zakeri, and G. Amiri. 2015. “Probabilistic seismic assessment of multiframe concrete box-girder bridges with unequal pier heights.” J. Perform. Constr. Facil. 30 (2): 04015016. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CF.1943-5509.0000753.
Bi, K., and H. Hao. 2014. “Influence of shear keys on the seismic behaviour of bridge structures to spatially varying ground motions.” In Proc., 23rd Australasian Conf. on the Mechanics of Structures and Materials, 955–960, edited by S. T. Smith. Brisbane, Australia: Springer.
Bozorgzadeh, A., S. Megally, J. Restrepo, and S. Ashford. 2006. “Capacity evaluation of exterior sacrificial shear keys of bridge abutments.” J. Bridge Eng. 11 (5): 555–565. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0702(2006)11:5(555).
Buckle, I. G. 1994. The Northridge California earthquake of January 17, 1994: Performance of highway bridges. Buffalo, NY: National Center for Earthquake Engineering Research.
Caltrans. 2007. RC bridge capacity assessment training manual. Sacramento, CA: Structure Maintenance and Investigation, California Dept. of Transportation.
Caltrans. 2013. “Seismic design criteria: Version 1.7.” Accessed May 1, 2013. https://dot.ca.gov/programs/engineering-services/manuals/seismic-design-criteria.
Chang, G. A., and J. B. Mander. 1994. Seismic energy based fatigue damage analysis of bridge columns: Part 1—Evaluation of seismic capacity. Buffalo, NY: State Univ. of New York.
Choi, E. 2002. “Seismic analysis and retrofit of Mid-America bridges.” Ph.D. thesis, School of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology.
Comartin, C., M. Greene, and S. Tubbesing. 1995. The Hyogo-Ken Nanbu earthquake preliminary reconnaissance report. Oakland, CA: Earthquake Engineering Research Institute.
DesRoches, R., T. Pfeifer, R. T. Leonand, and T. Lam. 2003. “Full-scale tests of seismic cable restrainer retrofits for simply supported bridges.” J. Bridge Eng. 8 (4): 191–198. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0702(2003)8:4(191).
Duan, L., and F. Li. 2003. Seismic design philosophies and performance-based design criteria. in bridge engineering—Seismic design. Edited by W.-F. Chen, and L. Duan. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
FHWA (Federal Highway Administration). 2006. Seismic retrofitting manual for highway structures: Part 1—Bridges. Washington, DC: FHWA.
Glisic, B., D. Posenato, D. Inaudi, and A. Figini. 2008. “Structural health monitoring method for curved concrete bridge box girders.” In Vol. 6932 of Proc., Sensors and Smart Structures Technologies for Civil, Mechanical, and Aerospace Systems 2008. San Diego: SPIE. https://doi.org/10.1117/12.778643.
Goel, R., and A. Chopra. 2008. “Role of shear keys in seismic behavior of bridges crossing fault-rupture zones.” J. Bridge Eng. 13 (4): 398–408. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0702(2008)13:4(398).
Kaviani, P., Z. Farzin, and T. Ertugrul. 2014. Performance-based seismic assessment of skewed bridges. Berkeley, CA: Univ. of California, Berkeley.
Kawashima, K., and G. Shoji. 2000. “Effect of restrainers to mitigate pounding between adjacent decks subjected to a strong ground motion.” In Proc., 12th World Conf. on Earthquake Engineering, Auckland, NZ: New Zealand Society for Earthquake Engineering.
McKenna, F. 2011. “OpenSees: A framework for earthquake engineering simulation.” Comput. Sci. Eng. 13 (4): 58–66. https://doi.org/10.1109/MCSE.2011.66.
Megally, S. H., P. F. Silva, and F. Seible. 2002. Seismic response of sacrificial shear keys in bridge abutments. SSRP-2001/24. San Diego: Univ. of California.
Moehle, J. P. 1994. “Northridge earthquake of January 17, 1994: Reconnaissance report, volume 1—Highway bridges and traffic management.” Earthquake Spectra 11 (3): 287–372.
Moustafa, M. A., and K. M. Mosalam. 2015. “Seismic response of bent caps in as-built and retrofitted reinforced concrete box-girder bridges.” Eng. Struct. 98 (Sep): 59–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2015.04.028.
Muthukumar, S. A. 2003. “Contact element approach with hysteresis damping for the analysis and design of pounding in bridges.” Ph.D. dissertation, School of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology.
Padgett, J. E. 2007. “Seismic vulnerability assessment of retrofitted bridges using probabilistic methods.” Ph.D. thesis, School of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Georgia Technology.
Padgett, J. E., and R. DesRoches. 2009. “Retrofitted bridge fragility analysis for typical classes of multispan bridges.” J. Earthquake Spectra 25 (1): 117–141. https://doi.org/10.1193/1.3049405.
PEER Strong Motion Database. 2018. “Peer NGA-West2 database.” Accessed July 16, 2013. https://peer.berkeley.edu/peer-strong-ground-motion-databases.
Priestley, M. J. N., F. Seible, and G. M. Calvi. 1996. Seismic design and retrofit of bridges. New York: Wiley.
Ramanathan, K. N. 2012. Next generation seismic fragility curves for California bridges incorporating the evolution in seismic design philosophy. Atlanta: Georgia Institute of Technology.
SAC (Special Agent in Charge). 1997. “SAC joint venture steel project phase 2—Project task: 5.4.1: Suites of earthquake ground motions for analysis of steel moment frame structures.” Accessed October 1, 2000. https://www.sacsteel.org/.
Saiidi, M., E. Maragakis, S. Abdel-Ghaffar, S. Feng, and D. O’Connor. 1993. Response of bridge hinge restrainers during earthquakes-field performance, analysis, and design. Reno, NV: Univ. of Nevada, Reno.
Saiidi, M., E. Maragakis, and S. Feng. 1996. “Parameters in bridge restrainer design for seismic retrofit.” J. Struct. Eng. 122 (1): 61–68. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE),0733-9445122:1(61).
Saiidi, M., M. Randall, E. A. Maragakis, and T. Isakovic. 2001. “Seismic restrainer design methods for simply supported bridges.” J. Bridge Eng. 6 (5): 307–315. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0702(2001)6:5(307).
Shamsabadi, A., and L. Yan. 2008. “Closed-formed force-displacement backbone curves for bridge abutment backfill systems.” In Proc., Geotechnical Earthquake Engineering and Soil Dynamic IV Congress. Reston, VA: ASCE.
Watanabe, G., and K. Kawashima. 2004. “Effectiveness of cable-restrainer for mitigating rotation of a skewed bridge subjected to strong ground shaking.” In Proc., 13WCEE, Paper No. 789. Vancouver, BC, Canada: Canadian Association for Earthquake Engineering, International Association for Earthquake Engineering.
Yashinsky, M. 1995. Northridge Earthquake: Lifeline Performance and Post-Earthquake Response: Bridges and Roadways. TCLEE Monograph No. 8. Reston, VA: ASCE.
Yashinsky, M., and M. J. Karshenas. 2003. Fundamentals of seismic protection for bridges. Oakland, CA: Earthquake Engineering Research Institute.
Zakeri, B., J. E. Padgett, and G. Ghodrati Amiri. 2013. “Fragility assessment for seismically retrofitted skewed reinforced concrete box girder bridges.” J. Perform. Constr. Facil. 29 (2): 04014043. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CF.1943-5509.0000502.
Zareian, F., E. Taciroglu, P. Kaviani, C. B. Haselton, and P. Pla-Junca. 2011. “Performance-based seismic assessment of skewed bridges.” In Proc., 8th Int. Conf. on Urban Earthquake Engineering. Tokyo: Tokyo Institute of Technology.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities
Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities
Volume 34Issue 3June 2020

History

Received: Sep 25, 2018
Accepted: Nov 20, 2019
Published online: Mar 28, 2020
Published in print: Jun 1, 2020
Discussion open until: Aug 28, 2020

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

M. Abbasi, Ph.D.
Research Associate, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of Nevada, Reno, Reno NV 89557-0258.
Assistant Professor, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of Nevada, Reno, Reno, NV 89557-0258 (corresponding author). ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1006-7685. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share