Technical Papers
Dec 18, 2019

Seismic Vulnerability Assessment and Strengthening of New Market Building Damaged after January 4, 2016, Imphal, India, Earthquake

Publication: Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities
Volume 34, Issue 2

Abstract

Important buildings located in high seismic zones of many developing countries are sometimes designed without paying much attention to the earthquake risk in the area. Such buildings are prone to severe damage during earthquakes and need immediate strengthening using techniques that should not only be economical but also should not interfere with the functioning of the building. The present study focuses on the assessment of the seismic vulnerability of a publicly funded reinforced concrete building (New Market building) in Imphal, India, that suffered severe damage during January 4, 2016, earthquake. It is further intended to suggest a suitable strengthening strategy for improving the lateral-load performance of the large building used by hundreds of local vendors. A detailed investigation of the damaged building was first carried out visually as well as using nondestructive tools and by collecting concrete core samples from various members of the building. Demand to capacity ratios (DCRs) were obtained using nonlinear static and dynamic analyses to determine the adequacy of the column sections of the building. Local seismic strengthening in the form of reinforced concrete jacketing was applied to the weaker columns (DCR>1) based on several trials to achieve the required global strength and ductility. After retrofitting, yielding of most of the column members is substantially delayed. In addition, the peak story displacement and acceleration are found to be remarkably reduced for both the orthogonal directions. The seismic vulnerability assessment of the original building suggests that most of the column sections do not satisfy the allowable code-specified drift limits; however, the vulnerability reduced substantially after implementing the suggested strengthening scheme.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Acknowledgments

Assistance provided by Dr. Arun Chandra Borsaikia and Dr. Syed Humayun Basha in carrying out the nondestructive testing is gratefully appreciated. Prof. Durgesh C. Rai of IIT Kanpur and Prof. Vaibhav Singhal of IIT Patna accompanied the last author to the postearthquake reconnaissance visit financially supported by the Poonam and Prabhu Goel Foundation established at IIT Kanpur.

References

BIS (Bureau of Indian Standards). 1959. Method of tests for strength of concrete. IS 516. New Delhi, India: BIS.
BIS (Bureau of Indian Standards). 1987. Code of practice for design loads (other than earthquake) for buildings and structures. IS 875. New Delhi, India: BIS.
BIS (Bureau of Indian Standards). 1992. Non-destructive testing of concrete—Method of test. IS 13311. New Delhi, India: BIS.
BIS (Bureau of Indian Standards). 2000. Indian standard for plain and reinforced concrete—Code of practice. IS 456. New Delhi, India: BIS.
BIS (Bureau of Indian Standards). 2013. Seismic evaluation and strengthening of existing reinforced concrete buildings—Guidelines. IS 5988. New Delhi, India: BIS.
BIS (Bureau of Indian Standards). 2016a. Criteria for earthquake resistant design of structures. IS 1893. New Delhi, India: BIS.
BIS (Bureau of Indian Standards). 2016b. Ductile detailing of reinforced concrete structures subjected to seismic forces—Code of practice. IS 13920. New Delhi, India: BIS.
Cavaleri, L., and F. D. Trapani. 2014. “Cyclic response of masonry infilled RC frames: Experimental results and simplified modeling.” Soil Dyn. Earthquake Eng. 65 (Oct): 224–242. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2014.06.016.
Chen, W. P., and P. Molnar. 1990. “Source parameters of earthquakes and intraplate deformation beneath the Shillong plateau and northern Indo-Burman ranges.” J. Geophys. Res. 95 (12): 12527–12552. https://doi.org/10.1029/JB095iB08p12527.
CSI (Computers and Structures Inc.). 2015. Structural analysis program, SAP2000 version 18: Advanced, static and dynamic finite element analysis of structures. Berkeley, CA: CSI.
FEMA. 2012. Next-generation methodology for seismic performance assessment of buildings. Washington, DC: FEMA.
Hahn, G. T., V. Bhargava, and Q. Chen. 1990. “The cyclic stress-strain properties, hysteresis loop shape, and kinematic hardening of two high-strength bearing steels.” Metall. Mater. Trans. 21 (2): 653–665. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02671936.
Hurukawa, N., and M. P. Maung. 2011. “Two seismic gaps on the Sagaing fault, Myanmar, derived from relocation of historical earthquakes since 1918.” Geophys. Res. Lett. 38 (1): L01310. https://doi.org/10.1029/2010GL046099.
Kaushik, H. B. 2016. Non-destructive testing and concrete core cutting at Laxmi Market and New Market in Imphal, Manipur. Manipur, India: Public Works Dept.
Kaushik, H. B., D. C. Rai, and S. K. Jain. 2007. “Stress-strain characteristics of clay brick masonry under uniaxial compression.” J. Mater. Civ. Eng. 19 (9): 728–739. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0899-1561(2007)19:9(728).
Mander, J. B., M. J. Priestley, and R. Park. 1988. “Theoretical stress-strain model for confined concrete.” J. Struct. Eng. 114 (8): 1804–1826. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1988)114:8(1804).
Mukherjee, S., and V. K. Gupta. 2002. “Wavelet-based generation of spectrum-compatible time-histories.” Soil Dyn. Earthquake Eng. 22 (9): 799–804. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0267-7261(02)00101-X.
Paulay, T., and M. J. N. Priestley. 1992. Seismic design of concrete and masonry structures. New York: Wiley.
Person, W. J. 1988. “Seismological notes—January–February.” Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 78 (6): 2115–2119.
Rai, D. C., H. B. Kaushik, and V. Singhal. 2017. “M 6.7, 4 January 2016 Imphal earthquake: Dismal performance of publicly-funded buildings.” Curr. Sci. 113 (12): 2341–2350. https://doi.org/10.18520/cs/v113/i12/2341-2350.
Singh, A. P., N. P. Rao, M. R. Kumar, M. C. Hsieh, and L. Zhao. 2017. “Role of the Kopili fault in deformation tectonics of the Indo Burmese arc inferred from the rupture process of the 3 January 2016 Mw 6.7 Imphal earthquake.” Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 107 (2): 1041–1047. https://doi.org/10.1785/0120160276.
Takeda, T., M. A. Sozen, and N. N. Neilsen. 1970. “Reinforced concrete response to simulated earthquakes.” J. Struct. Div. 96 (12): 2557–2573.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities
Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities
Volume 34Issue 2April 2020

History

Received: Feb 18, 2019
Accepted: Jul 3, 2019
Published online: Dec 18, 2019
Published in print: Apr 1, 2020
Discussion open until: May 18, 2020

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Trishna Choudhury [email protected]
Assistant Professor, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Thapar Institute of Engineering and Technology, Patiala, Punjab 147004, India. Email: [email protected]
Vimlesh Kumar [email protected]
Formerly, Graduate Student, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Guwahati, Guwahati, Assam 781039, India. Email: [email protected]
Faizal Rashid [email protected]
Formerly, Graduate Student, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Guwahati, Guwahati, Assam 781039, India. Email: [email protected]
Professor, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Guwahati, Guwahati, Assam 781039, India (corresponding author). ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5896-6543. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share