Retrospective Analysis of Hydraulic Bridge Collapse
Publication: Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities
Volume 34, Issue 1
Abstract
The investigation concentrates on the most predominant cause of bridge collapse (239 or 55%), which is the result of hydraulic effects. Out of all the causes of bridge collapses, the National Bridge Inventory (NBI) and constructed control groups found that hydraulic collapse diverges significantly. The control group consists of randomly selected bridges from the 2017 NBI, controlling for age and other parameters. The study of hydraulic-collapsed bridges yields statistical trends through nonparametric tests. Results for hydraulic collapse include an annual failure rate of approximately 1 out of 8,500. Structural deficiency is associated with hydraulic collapse at a rate of 44% in comparison to the control group, which has a rate of 15%. Precollapse evaluations for hydraulic-collapsed bridges and the control group are scour critical at a rate of 17% and 6% and scour stable at 83% and 94%, respectively, when nonscour-evaluated bridges are omitted. Precollapse substructure condition rating is poor for 34% of bridges and is lower, or 11%, for the control group. The substructure condition rating is a better indicator of collapse than the scour critical appraisal rating; additionally, scour is paired with less hazardous conditions (e.g., minor cracking with minor scour). Consequences are limited for hydraulic collapses compared to other causes of collapse in terms of average daily traffic traversing the structure and life loss. Maintenance issues are presented to reduce hydraulic bridge collapse with consideration for underwater inspections and flood events.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
AASHTO. 2016. American association of state highway and transportation officials (LRFD) bridge design specifications. 7th ed. Washington, DC: AASHTO.
Agrawal, A. K., A. Kawaguchi, and Z. Chen. 2010. “Deterioration rates of typical bridge elements in New York.” J. Bridge Eng. 15 (4): 419–429. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0000123.
Chang, F. E. M. 1973. A statistical summary of the cause and cost of bridge failures. Washington, DC: US DOT.
Chang, M., M. Maguire, and Y. Sun. 2017. “Framework for mitigating human bias in selection of explanatory variables for bridge deterioration modeling.” J. Infrastruct. Syst. 23 (3): 04017002. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)IS.1943-555x.0000352.
Cook, W., P. Barr, and W. Halling. 2015. “Bridge failure rate.” J. Perform. Constr. Facil. 29 (3): 04014080. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CF.1943-5509.0000571.
Cook, W., and P. J. Barr. 2017. “Observations and trends among collapsed bridges in New York State.” J. Perform. Constr. Facil. 31 (4): 04017011. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CF.1943-5509.0000996.
DeStefano, P. D., and D. Grivas. 1999. “Closure to ‘Method for estimating transition probability in bridge deterioration models’ by Paul D. DeStefano and Dimitri Grivas.” J. Infrastruct. Syst. 5 (2): 87. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1076-0342(1999)5:2(87).
FHWA (Federal Highway Administration). 1995. “Recording and coding for the structure inventory and appraisal of the nation’s bridge.” Accessed November 1, 2016. https://www.fhwa.dot.gov/bridge/mtguide.pdf.
FHWA (Federal Highway Administration). 2011. “Bridge preservation guide.” Accessed March 5, 2018. https://www.fhwa.dot.gov/bridge/preservation/guide/guide.pdf.
FHWA (Federal Highway Administration). 2014. “2010 conditions and performance: Policy.” Accessed November 7, 2014. https://www.fhwa.dot.gov/policy/2010cpr/chap3.cfm.
FHWA (Federal Highway Administration). 2018. “Federal highway administration NBI ASCII files.” Accessed February 18, 2018. https://www.fhwa.dot.gov/bridge/nbi/ascii.cfm.
Flint, M. M., O. Fringer, S. L. Billington, D. Freyberg, and N. S. Diffenbaugh. 2017. “Historical analysis of hydraulic bridge collapses in the continental United States.” J. Infrastruct. Syst. 23 (3): 04017005. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)IS.1943-555X.0000354.
Flowers, J. N., W. C. Zech, and H. H. Abbas. 2010. “Rapid bridge deck replacement construction techniques.” Transp. Res. Rec. 2152 (1): 39–48. https://doi.org/10.3141/2152-05.
Frangopol, D. M., M. Kallen, and J. M. Noortwijk. 2004. “Probabilistic models for life-cycle performance of deteriorating structures: Review and future directions.” Prog. Struct. Eng. Mater. 6 (4): 197–212. https://doi.org/10.1002/pse.180.
Harik, I. E., A. M. Shaaban, H. Gesund, G. Y. Valli, and S. T. Wang. 1990. “United States bridge failures, 1951–1988.” J. Perform. Constr. Facil. 4 (4): 272–277. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0887-3828(1990)4:4(272).
Laerd Statistics. 2013. “Kruskal-Wallis H test using SPSS statistics.” Accessed March 4, 2017. https://statistics.laerd.com/spss-tutorials/kruskal-wallis-h-test-using-spss-statistics.php.
Meade, B. W., T. Hopwood, II, and S. Palle. 2017. A programmatic approach to long-term bridge preventive maintenance. Lexington, Kentucky: Kentucky Transportation Center.
NYSDOT (New York State Department of Transportation). 2004. “Bridge safety assurance: Hydraulic vulnerability manual.” Accessed October 23, 2017. https://www.dot.ny.gov/divisions/engineering/structures/repository/manuals/bridge_safety/bsa_hyd_vuln_manual.pdf.
Padgett, J., R. DesRoches, B. Nielson, M. Yashinsky, O. Kwon, N. Burdette, and E. Tavera. 2008. “Bridge damage and repair costs from Hurricane Katrina.” J. Bridge Eng. 13 (1): 6–14. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0702(2008)13:1(6).
Sobanjo, J., P. Mtenga, and M. Rambo-Roddenberry. 2010. “Reliability-based modeling of bridge deterioration hazards.” J. Bridge Eng. 15 (6): 671–683. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0000074.
Statistics Solutions. 2019. “Kruskal-Wallis test: Statistics solutions.” Accessed February 2, 2019. https://www.statisticssolutions.com/kruskal-wallis-test/.
Wardhana, K., and F. C. Hadipriono. 2003. “Analysis of recent bridge failures in the United States.” J. Perform. Constr. Facil. 17 (3): 144–150. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0887-3828(2003)17:3(144).
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
©2019 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: Nov 14, 2018
Accepted: Jun 10, 2019
Published online: Dec 11, 2019
Published in print: Feb 1, 2020
Discussion open until: May 11, 2020
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.