Technical Papers
Jan 21, 2020

Live-Load Behavior of a Twin I-Girder Bridge

Publication: Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities
Volume 34, Issue 2

Abstract

Very little data exists on the live-load behavior of twin-girder bridges despite their unique configuration and minimal redundancy. To investigate the live-load behavior of twin girder bridges, the State Highway 52 Bridge over the Snake River was instrumented and studied. The live-load response was monitored by attaching 62 strain gauges on girders, stringers, and intermediate diaphragms at nine cross-sectional locations. The live-load was applied with two trucks that were driven along three predetermined load paths. A finite-element model of the bridge was calibrated with the measured response from the live-load tests. The calibrated finite-element model was used to quantify moment distribution factors and load ratings for the bridge. The finite-element distribution factors were compared with those calculated according to methods provided in the AASHTO standard and LRFD specifications. The distribution factors from both specifications were found to be unconservative for the girders and overly conservative for the stringers. The model also was used to quantify the effect of the transverse diaphragm members on the live-load distribution. Distribution factors were calculated with and without the diaphragm members. The diaphragms were found to increase the distribution of moments by over 20% for both positive and negative moments.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Acknowledgments

The authors express their gratitude to the Utah Transportation Center (UTC) in partnership with the Mountain Plains Consortium, who provided the financial support for this study. The authors also thank Bridge Diagnostics, Inc. (BDI), who was contracted by the Idaho Transportation Department and performed the live-load test that provided the data as the basis for this study.

References

AASHTO. 2002. Standard specifications for highway bridges. 17th ed. Washington, DC: AASHTO.
AASHTO. 2010. AASHTO LRFD bridge design specifications. 5th ed. Washington, DC: AASHTO.
Armendariz, R. R., and M. D. Bowman. 2018. “Improved load rating of an open-spandrel reinforced-concrete arch bridge.” J. Perform. Constr. Facil. 32 (4): 04018035. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CF.1943-5509.0001177.
Barr, P. J., M. O. Eberhard, and J. F. Stanton. 2001. “Live–load distribution factors in prestressed concrete girder bridges.” J. Bridge Eng. 6 (5): 298–306. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0702(2001)6:5(298).
BDI. 2013. Field testing and load rating report: SH-52 over the Snake. River-Payette, ID: Bridge Diagnostics.
Brenner, B., E. S. Bell, M. Sanayei, E. Pheifer, and W. Durack. 2010. “Structural modeling, instrumentation, and load testing of the Tobin Memorial Bridge in Boston, Massachusetts.” In Proc., 2010 Structures Congress. Reston, VA: ASCE.
Chajes, M., D. Mertz, S. Quiel, H. Roecker, and J. Milius. 2005. “Steel girder fracture on Delaware’s I-95 bridge over the Brandywine River.” In Proc., 2005 Structures Congress and the 2005 Forensic Engineering Symp. Reston, VA: ASCE.
Cousins, T., J. Stallings, D. Lower, and T. Stafford. 1998. “Field evaluation of fatigue cracking in diaphragm-girder connections.” J. Perform. Constr. Facil. 12 (1): 25–32. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0887-3828(1998)12:1(25).
Eamon, C. D., A. Chehab, and G. Parra-Montesinos. 2016. “Field tests of two prestressed-concrete girder bridges for live-load distribution and moment continuity.” J. Bridge Eng. 21 (5): 04015086. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0000859.
Eom, J., and A. S. Nowak. 2001. “Live load distribution for steel girder bridges.” J. Bridge Eng. 6 (6): 489–497. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0702(2001)6:6(489).
Faber, M. H., D. V. Val, and M. G. Stewart. 2000. “Proof load testing for bridge assessment and upgrading.” Eng. Struct. 22 (12): 1677–1689. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0141-0296(99)00111-X.
Harris, D. K., J. M. Civitillo, and A. Gheitasi. 2016. “Performance and behavior of hybrid composite beam bridge in Virginia: Live load testing.” J. Bridge Eng. 21 (6): 04016022. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0000820.
Huang, H., H. W. Shenton, and M. J. Chajes. 2004. “Load distribution for a highly skewed bridge: Testing and analysis.” J. Bridge Eng. 9 (6): 558–562. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0702(2004)9:6(558).
Hunley, C. T., and I. E. Harik. 2012. “Structural redundancy evaluation of steel tub girder bridges.” J. Bridge Eng. 17 (3): 481–489. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0000266.
Kim, J., and E. B. Williamson. 2015. “Finite-element modeling of twin steel box-girder bridges for redundancy evaluation.” J. Bridge Eng. 20 (10): 04014106. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0000706.
Krzmarzick, D. P., and J. F. Hajjar. 2006. “Load rating of curved composite steel I-girder bridges through load testing with heavy trucks.” In Proc., 2006 Structures Congress. Reston, VA: ASCE.
Lam, H., W. Lin, and T. Yoda. 2017. “Performance of composite twin I-girder bridges with fatigue-induced cracks” J. Bridge Eng. 22 (9): 04017056. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0001094.
Maguire, M., C. Moen, C. Roberts-Wollmann, and T. Cousins. 2015. “Field verification of simplified analysis procedures for segmental concrete bridges.” J. Struct. Eng. 141 (1): D4014007. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0001111.
Moliner, E., J. Lavado, and P. Museros. 2016. “Evaluation of transverse impact factors in twin-box girder bridges for high-speed railways.” J. Bridge Eng. 21 (5): 06016002. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0000896.
Morrill, J. L. 2016. “Live-load test and finite-element model analysis of a steel girder bridge.” M.S. thesis, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Utah State Univ.
Roddenberry, M. R., J. Chipperfield, and K. S. Tawfiq. 2011. “Effect of secondary elements on load distribution in prestressed bridge girders.” In Proc., 2011 Structures Congress. Reston, VA: ASCE.
Samaras, V. A., J. P. Sutton, E. B. Williamson, and K. H. Frank. 2012. “Simplified method for evaluating the redundancy of twin steel box-girder bridges.” J. Bridge Eng. 17 (3): 470–480. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0000280.
Yost, J. R., J. L. Schulz, and B. C. Commander. 2005. “Using NDT data for finite element model calibration and load rating of bridges.” In Proc., Structures Congress: Metropolis and Beyond. Reston, VA: ASCE.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities
Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities
Volume 34Issue 2April 2020

History

Received: Sep 10, 2018
Accepted: May 28, 2019
Published online: Jan 21, 2020
Published in print: Apr 1, 2020
Discussion open until: Jun 21, 2020

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Jake Morrill, M.ASCE
Graduate Research Assistant, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Utah State Univ., 4110 Old Main Hill, Logan, UT 84332-4110.
Paul J. Barr, M.ASCE [email protected]
Professor, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Utah State Univ., 4110 Old Main Hill, Logan, UT 84332-4110 (corresponding author). Email: [email protected]
Marvin W. Halling, F.ASCE [email protected]
Professor, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Utah State Univ., 4110 Old Main Hill, Logan, UT 84332-4110. Email: [email protected]
Marc Maguire, A.M.ASCE [email protected]
Assistant Professor, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Utah State Univ., 4110 Old Main Hill, Logan, UT 84332-4110. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share