Technical Papers
Feb 20, 2019

Response of a Composite-Adjacent Box Beam Bridge with Skewed Beams under Static and Quasi-Static Loads

Publication: Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities
Volume 33, Issue 3

Abstract

Adjacent box beams are widely used for constructing short- and medium-span bridges on roadways throughout the United States. The performance of a straight, noncomposite-adjacent box beam bridge under a live load is well understood, while the behavior of a composite-adjacent box beam bridge constructed using beams poured into a form with a skew angle, known as a skewed adjacent box beam bridge, is not. The focus of this research is the evaluation of the in situ performance of the skewed composite-adjacent box beam bridge located on Dry Creek Road in Granville, Licking County, Ohio, which is a single-span bridge with a 28° skew angle. To evaluate the overall bridge behavior under live loads, the beams were instrumented with strain gauges and linear variable differential transformers (LVDTs). The live load testing was performed using a tandem axle dump truck and single-axle truck under both static and quasi-static controlled load conditions. The experimental results from the current work were used to evaluate three characteristics representative of bridge response: lateral load distribution, skew effect, and shear key relative displacement. This work proposes that the composite-adjacent box beam superstructure components behave as an integral unit resisting the applied load. Additionally, the skewed geometry distributes the strain asymmetrically across the width of the bridge. Most of the applied loads correspond to a diagonal path to the supports at the obtuse corners. The measurement of the relative displacement showed that most of the shear keys experience cracks. Ten months after the truck load test, the reflected cracks were visible on the bridge deck. The cracks occurred where the highest relative displacements were measured. The measured longitudinal tensile strain showed that the load is transferred effectively from one beam to another. The current work also suggests that the cracks developed in the shear keys do not have a significant effect on the load distribution between adjacent box beams because the presence of the composite deck enhances load distribution.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Acknowledgments

The member of the research team thank Tim Keller, of the Office of Structural Engineering at the Ohio Department of Transportation for the project; William Lozier and Michael Bline, the Licking County engineer and bridge engineer; and the staff and student researchers at Ohio University for their assistance during the field testing.

References

AASHTO. 2012. LRFD design specifications. Washington, DC: AASHTO.
ACI (American Concrete Institute). 2005. Building code requirements for structural concrete and commentary: An ACI standard. ACI 318M-05. Detroit, MI: ACI.
Bakht, B. 1988. “Analysis of some skew bridges as right bridges.” J. Struct. Eng. 114 (10): 2307–2322. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1988)114:10(2307).
Bishara, A. G., M. C. Liu, and N. D. El-Ali. 1993. “Wheel load distribution on simply supported skew I-beam composite bridges.” J. Struct. Eng. 119 (2): 399–419. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1993)119:2(399).
Coletti, D., B. Chavel, and W. Gatti. 2011. “Challenges of skew in bridges with steel girders.” Transp. Res. Rec. 2251: 47–56. https://doi.org/10.3141/2251-05.
Conner, S., and X. S. Huo. 2006. “Influence of parapets and aspect ratio on live-load distribution.” J. Bridge Eng. 11 (2): 188–196. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0702(2006)11:2(188).
Dong, L., L. Yue, and T. M. Ahlborn. 2007. “Performance of joint connections between decked prestressed concrete bridge girders.” In Proc., PCI National Bridge Conf. Chicago: Precast/Prestressed Concrete Institute.
El-Remaily, A., M. K. Tadros, T. Yamane, and G. Krause. 1996. “Transverse design of adjacent precast prestressed concrete box girder bridges.” PCI J. 4 (4): 96–113.
Engström, B. 2008. Structural connections for precast concrete buildings: Guide to good practice bulletin 43. Lausanne, Switzerland: International Federation for Structural Concrete.
Fu, C. C., Z. Pan, and M. S. Ahmed. 2010. “Transverse posttensioning design of adjacent precast solid multi-beam bridges.” J. Perform. Constr. Facil. 25 (3): 223–230. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CF.1943-5509.0000147.
Giraldo-Londoño, O. 2014. “Finite element modeling of the load transfer mechanism in adjacent prestressed concrete box-beams.” M.S. thesis, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Ohio Univ.
Grace, N. F., E. A. Jensen, and M. R. Bebawy. 2012. “Transverse post-tensioning arrangement for 564 side-by-side box-beam bridges.” PCI J. 57 (2): 48–63.
Hambly, E. C. 1991. Bridge deck behaviour. London: CRC Press.
Huckelbridge, A. A., H. El-Esnawi, and F. Moses. 1993. An investigation of load transfer in multi-beam prestressed box girder bridges. Cleveland: Case Western Reserve Univ.
Huckelbridge, A. A., Jr., H. El-Esnawi, and F. Moses. 1995. “Shear key performance in multibeam boxgirder bridges.” J. Perform. Constr. Facil. 9 (4): 271–285. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0887-3828 (1995)9:4(271).
Julio, E. N., F. A. Branco, and V. D. Silva. 2004. “Concrete-to-concrete bond strength: Influence of the roughness of the substrate surface.” Constr. Build. Mater. 18 (9): 675–681. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2004.04.023.
Khaloo, A. R., and H. Mirzabozorg. 2003. “Load distribution factors in simply supported skew bridges.” J. Bridge Eng. 8 (4): 241–244. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0702(2003)8:4(241).
Menassa, C., M. Mabsout, K. Tarhini, and G. Frederick. 2007. “Influence of skew angle on reinforced concrete slab bridges.” J. Bridge Eng. 12 (2): 205–214. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0702(2007)12:2(205).
Miller, R. A., G. M. Hlavacs, T. Long, and A. Greuel. 1999. “Full-scale testing of shear keys for adjacent box girder bridges.” PCI J. 44 (6): 80–90. https://doi.org/10.15554/pcij.11011999.80.90.
Mutashar, R., S. Sargand, A. Al-Jhayyish, and I. Khoury. 2018a. “Minimizing ends’ cracks of skewed pre-tensioned box beam concrete girders.” In Proc., Congress on Concrete Structure. Reston, VA: ASCE.
Mutashar, R., S. Sargand, and I. Khoury. 2017. “End zone cracks for skewed pre-tensioned box beam concrete girders.” In Proc., Congress on Technical Advancement, 77–88. Reston, VA: ASCE.
Mutashar, R., S. Sargand, I. Khoury, and F. T. Al Rikabi. 2018b. “Influence of nonuniform box beam dimensions and bridge transverse slope on environmentally induced stresses in adjacent box beam bridges.” J. Perform. Constr. Facil. 32 (6): 04018081. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CF.1943-5509.0001226.
PCI (Precast/Prestressed Concrete Institute). 2011. PCI bridge design manual. 3rd ed. Chicago: PCI.
Russell, H. G. 2011. “Adjacent precast concrete box-beam bridges: State of the practice.” PCI J. 56 (1): 75–91. https://doi.org/10.15554/pcij.01012011.75.91.
Théoret, P., B. Massicotte, and D. Conciatori. 2011. “Analysis and design of straight and skewed slab bridges.” J. Bridge Eng. 17 (2): 289–301. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0000249.
Yuan, J., and B. Graybeal. 2016. “Full-scale testing of shear key details for precast concrete box-beam bridges.” J. Bridge Eng. 21 (9): 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0000906.
Zokaie, T., and R. A. Imbsen. 1993. Distribution of wheel loads on highway bridges. Washington, DC: Transportation Research Board, National Research Council.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities
Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities
Volume 33Issue 3June 2019

History

Received: May 24, 2018
Accepted: Oct 1, 2018
Published online: Feb 20, 2019
Published in print: Jun 1, 2019
Discussion open until: Jul 20, 2019

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Ph.D. Candidate, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Ohio Univ., 102 Stocker Center, Athens, OH 45701, (corresponding author). ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8348-9996. Email: [email protected]
Shad Sargand, M.ASCE [email protected]
Russ Professor, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Ohio Univ., 208 Stocker Center, Athens, OH 45701. Email: [email protected]
Fouad T. Al Rikabi, S.M.ASCE [email protected]
Ph.D. Candidate, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Ohio Univ., 102 Stocker Center, Athens, OH 45701. Email: [email protected]; [email protected]
Issam Khoury, M.ASCE [email protected]
Assistant Professor, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Ohio Univ., 208 Stocker Engineering Center, Ohio Univ., Athens, OH 45701. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share