Technical Papers
Nov 9, 2018

Performance Evaluation of Seismic Strengthened Irregular RC–Steel Hybrid Frames

Publication: Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities
Volume 33, Issue 1

Abstract

New carbon emission requirements have brought about high demand for the retrofitting and strengthening of structures in power generation plants in order to accommodate the installation of pollution control devices. A typical form of such a retrofitted structure is a hybrid RC–steel frame with specific irregularity features. This paper presents the seismic performance evaluation of a representative irregular RC–steel hybrid frame formed by the vertical combination of a newly added steel frame and a preexisting RC frame. The prototype structure originates from a real retrofitting project, and the evaluation is carried out numerically by creating six variants of the hybrid frame retrofitted with different strengthening strategies on the RC frame using nonlinear finite-element modeling. The seismic performance of the hybrid frame structures is comparatively assessed in terms of roof displacement, story drift ratio, residual displacement, and hysteretic energy ratio when subjected to a group of selected earthquake ground motions at different intensity levels. The results show that among the three main types of retrofitting schemes, strengthening the preexisting RC frame with shear walls appears to be most effective in limiting roof and interstory drifts. Strengthening the preexisting RC frame at the local member level tends to be the least effective strategy. Overall, retrofitting the hybrid structure with steel bracings is deemed to be a more robust solution, both in terms of controlling displacements and enhancing hysteretic energy dissipation capacity.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Acknowledgments

The authors acknowledge supports from the Zhejiang Province Key Research and Development Program (Grant No. 2018C03033-1) and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 51779223, 51479176, and 51009122) for this study.

References

ASCE. 2010. Minimum design loads for buildings and other structures. Reston, VA: ASCE.
Athanassiadou, C. J. 2008. “Seismic performance of R/C plane frames irregular in elevation.” Eng. Struct. 30 (5): 1250–1261. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2007.07.015.
Baker, J. W. 2010. “Conditional mean spectrum: Tool for ground-motion selection.” J. Struct. Eng. 137 (3): 322–331. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0000215.
Bohlouli, Z., and M. Poursha. 2016. “Seismic evaluation of geometrically irregular steel moment resisting frames with setbacks considering their dynamic characteristics.” Bull. Earthquake Eng. 14 (10): 2757–2777. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-016-9910-y.
Ceci, A. M., V. Gattulli, and F. Potenza. 2011. “Serviceability and damage scenario in irregular RC structures: Post-earthquake observations and modeling predictions.” J. Perform. Constr. Facil. 27 (1): 98–115. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CF.1943-5509.0000317.
CEN (European Committee for Standardization). 2004. Design of Structures for earthquake resistance–Part 1: General rules, seismic actions and rules for buildings. Eurocode 8. Brussels, Belgium: CEN.
Chen, X. W., J. X. Li, and J. Cheang. 2010. “Seismic performance analysis of Wenchuan hospital structure with viscous dampers.” Struct. Des. Tall Spec. Build. 19 (4): 397–419. https://doi.org/10.1002/tal.603.
Chintanapakdee, C., and A. K. Chopra. 2004. “Seismic response of vertically irregular frames: Response history and modal pushover analyses.” J. Struct. Eng. 130 (8): 1177–1185. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2004)130:8(1177).
FEMA. 2000. Prestandard and commentary for the seismic rehabilitation of buildings. FEMA-356. Washington, DC: FEMA.
Hancock, J., J. Watson-Lamprey, N. A. Abrahamson, J. J. Bommer, A. Markatis, E. Mccoy, and R. Mendis. 2006. “An improved method of matching response spectra of recorded earthquake ground motion using wavelets.” J. Earthquake Eng. 10 (spec01): 67–89. https://doi.org/10.1142/S1363246906002736.
Kwong, N. S., A. K. Chopra, and R. K. McGuire. 2015. “Evaluation of ground motion selection and modification procedures using synthetic ground motions.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn. 44 (11): 1841–1861. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.2558.
Lu, Y. 2002. “Comparative study of seismic behavior of multistory reinforced concrete framed structures.” J. Struct. Eng. 128 (2): 169–178. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2002)128:2(169).
Lu, Y., X. M. Gu, and J. W. Wei. 2009. “Prediction of seismic drifts in multi-story frames with a new story capacity factor.” Eng. Struct. 31 (2): 345–357. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2008.09.005.
Michalis, F., V. Dimitrios, and P. Manolis. 2006. “Evaluation of the influence of vertical irregularities on the seismic performance of a nine-story steel frame.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn. 35 (12): 1489–1509. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.591.
Miranda, E. 1999. “Approximate seismic lateral deformation demands in multistory buildings.” J. Struct. Eng. 125 (4): 417–425. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1999)125:4(417).
Mwafy, A., and S. Khalifa. 2017. “Effect of vertical structural irregularity on seismic design of tall buildings.” Struct. Des. Tall Spec. Build. 26 (18): e1399. https://doi.org/10.1002/tal.1399.
Nezhad, M. E., and M. Poursha. 2015. “Seismic evaluation of vertically irregular building frames with stiffness, strength, combined-stiffness-and-strength and mass irregularities.” Earthquakes Struct. 9 (2): 353–373. https://doi.org/10.12989/eas.2015.9.2.353.
Papageorgiou, A. V., and C. J. Gantes. 2010. “Equivalent modal damping ratios for concrete/steel mixed structures.” Comput. Struct. 88 (19–20): 1124–1136. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruc.2010.06.014.
Papageorgiou, A. V., and C. J. Gantes. 2011. “Equivalent uniform damping ratios for linear irregularly damped concrete/steel mixed structures.” Soil Dyn. Earthquake Eng. 31 (3): 418–430. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2010.09.010.
Sadashiva, V. K., G. A. MacRae, and B. L. Deam. 2012. “Seismic response of structures with coupled vertical stiffness–strength irregularities.” Earthquake Eng. Struct Dyn. 41 (1): 119–138. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.1121.
Sarkar, P., A. M. Prasad, and D. Menon. 2010. “Vertical geometric irregularity in stepped building frames.” Eng. Struct. 32 (8): 2175–2182. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2010.03.020.
Sextos, A. G., E. I. Katsanos, and G. D. Manolis. 2011. “EC8-based earthquake record selection procedure evaluation: Validation study based on observed damage of an irregular R/C building.” Soil Dyn. Earthquake Eng. 31 (4): 583–597. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2010.10.009.
Soni, D. P., and B. B. Mistry. 2006. “Qualitative review of seismic response of vertically irregular building frames.” ISET J. Earthquake Technol. 43 (4): 121–132.
Tremblay, R., and L. Poncet. 2005. “Seismic performance of concentrically braced steel frames in multistory buildings with mass irregularity.” J. Struct. Eng. 131 (9): 1363–1375. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2005)131:9(1363).
Varadharajan, S., V. K. Sehgal, and B. Saini. 2014a. “Seismic behavior of multistory RC building frames with vertical setback irregularity.” Struct. Des. Tall Spec. Build. 23 (18): 1345–1380. https://doi.org/10.1002/tal.1147.
Varadharajan, S., V. K. Sehgal, and B. Saini. 2014b. “Seismic response of multistory reinforced concrete frame with vertical mass and stiffness irregularities.” Struct. Des. Tall Spec. Build. 23 (5): 362–389. https://doi.org/10.1002/tal.1045.
Watson-Lamprey, J., and N. Abrahamson. 2006. “Selection of ground motion time series and limits on scaling.” Soil Dyn. Earthquake Eng. 26 (5): 477–482. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2005.07.001.
Zhou, J., G. Bu, H. Wang, and J. Cai. 2013. “Modification of ductility reduction factor for vertically irregular structures subjected to pulse-like ground motions.” Adv. Struct. Eng. 16 (4): 641–652. https://doi.org/10.1260/1369-4332.16.4.641.
Zhou, J., W. Zhao, and W. Mao. 2015. “Least favorable probability of failure for 5- and 10-story RC frame structures with vertical irregularities.” J. Earthquake Eng. 19 (7): 1158–1180. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632469.2015.1025315.
Zhou, L., C. Ni, Y. H. Chui, and Z. Chen. 2014. “Seismic performance of a hybrid building system consisting of a light wood frame structure and a reinforced masonry core.” J. Perform. Constr. Facil. 28 (6): A4014013. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CF.1943-5509.0000597.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities
Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities
Volume 33Issue 1February 2019

History

Received: Mar 12, 2018
Accepted: Jul 13, 2018
Published online: Nov 9, 2018
Published in print: Feb 1, 2019
Discussion open until: Apr 9, 2019

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Ph.D. Student, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Zhejiang Univ., Hangzhou 310058, China. Email: [email protected]
Shunfeng Gong [email protected]
Professor, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Zhejiang Univ., Hangzhou 310058, China (corresponding author). Email: [email protected]
Yong Lu, F.ASCE [email protected]
Professor, School of Engineering, Institute for Infrastructure and Environment, Univ. of Edinburgh, Edinburgh EH9 3JL, UK. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share