Technical Papers
Sep 3, 2018

Influence of Nonuniform Box Beam Dimensions and Bridge Transverse Slope on Environmentally Induced Stresses in Adjacent Box Beam Bridges

Publication: Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities
Volume 32, Issue 6

Abstract

The service life of adjacent box beam bridges is curtailed by the corrosion of reinforcement in the girders and spalling of concrete. This damage is attributed primarily to infiltration of water and chemical agents through longitudinal cracks in the shear keys. However, there are two other possible factors that can lead to water penetration of the bridge structure and eventual failure in box beam bridges: nonuniform box beam dimensions and bridge transverse slope. No study has been conducted to evaluate the effects of these two factors on induced stresses in adjacent box beam bridges. Typically, box girders are placed together with a transverse slope to facilitate drainage, which creates contact areas along just the bottom edges of adjacent girders. Additionally, for girders with nonuniform dimensions, even if within beam dimension tolerance, the contact between adjacent beams may be created at isolated spots. Measurements made at a box beam fabrication site verified inconsistency of beam dimensions. Three-dimensional finite-element models of composite and noncomposite single-span skew-adjacent box beam bridges were created to determine the stresses induce at the contact areas under environmental load conditions. The finite-element model was calibrated and validated in terms of the stresses in tie bars using experimental temperature profiles (uniform with and without temperature gradient). Two models were analyzed; the first model represented the contact areas generated due to drainage slope and the second one represented nonuniform beam dimensions using realistic input data. Under uniform and temperature gradient conditions, the models showed that contact stresses exceeded the concrete design strength at certain spots along the beams’ length. For girders with full flat contact, the contact stresses were noted to be less than the concrete strength. Additionally, the results of the analysis showed the contact stresses were reduced when modeling a bridge with a reinforced concrete deck. Moreover, the skew geometry showed a significant effect on the distribution of stresses at contact zones. Furthermore, the finite-element failure mode was compared with past research in terms of the locations of the greatest deterioration, and good agreement was found. Based on the results, it is recommended in this study to construct box beam bridges with enough spacing between the beams to ensure that no contact occurs between them; it is also recommended to manufacture box beams with high levels of accuracy.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

References

AASHTO. 2000. Standard method of test for coefficient of thermal expansion of hydraulic cement concrete. AASHTO TP60. Washington, DC: AASHTO.
AASHTO. 2012. LRFD bridge design specifications. Washington, DC: AASHTO.
Ahlborn, P. E., M. Theresa, H. M. Aktan, A. M. Eng, U. Bandara, and C. G. Gilbertson. 2006. “Prestressed concrete box-beam bridge performance: Condition assessment and design analysis.” In Proc., Transportation Research Board 85th Annual Meeting. Washington, DC: Transportation Research Board.
ASTM. 2004. Standard test method for splitting tensile strength of cylindrical concrete specimens. ASTM C496/C496M. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM.
ASTM. 2006. Standard test method for compressive strength of chemical-resistant mortars, grouts, monolithic surfacing, and polymer concrete. ASTM C579. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM.
ASTM. 2014. Standard test method for compressive strength of cylindrical concrete specimens. ASTM C39/C39M. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM.
Attanayake, U., and H. Aktan. 2013. “First-generation ABC system, evolving design, and half a century of performance: Michigan side-by-side box-beam bridges.” J. Perform. Constr. Facil. 29 (3): 04014090. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CF.1943-5509.0000526.
Bebawy, M. R. 2007. “Optimum transverse post-tensioning arrangement for side-by-side box-beam bridges.” M.Sc. thesis, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Lawrence Technological Univ.
Coletti, D., B. Chavel, and W. Gatti. 2011. “Challenges of skew in bridges with steel girders.” Transp. Res. Rec. 2251: 47–56. https://doi.org/10.3141/2251-05.
Dong, L., L. Yue, and T. M. Ahlborn. 2007. “Performance of joint connections between decked prestressed concrete bridge girders.” In Proc., PCI National Bridge Conf. Chicago: Precast/Prestressed Concrete Institute.
Dong, X. 2002. “Traffic forces and temperature effects on shear key connections for adjacent box girder bridge.” Ph.D. dissertation, Univ. of Cincinnati.
El-Remaily, A., M. K. Tadros, T. Yamane, and G. Krause. 1996. “Transverse design of adjacent precast prestressed concrete box girder bridges.” PCI J. 41 (4): 96–113.
Fu, C. C., Z. Pan, and M. S. Ahmed. 2011. “Transverse posttensioning design of adjacent precast solid multibeam bridges.” J. Perform. Constr. Facil. 25 (3): 223–230. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CF.1943-5509.0000147.
Grace, N. F., T. Enomoto, A. Abdel-Mohti, Y. Tokal, and S. Puravankara 2008. “Flexural behavior of precast concrete box beams post-tensioned with unbonded, carbon-fiber-composite cables.” PCI J. 53 (4): 62–82.
Grace, N. F., E. A. Jensen, and M. R. Bebawy. 2012. “Transverse post-tensioning arrangement for side-by-side box-beam bridges.” PCI J. 57 (2): 48–63. https://doi.org/10.15554/pcij.03012012.48.63.
Huckelbridge, A. A., Jr., H. El-Esnawi, and F. Moses. 1995. “Shear key performance in multibeam box-girder bridges.” J. Perform. Constr. Facil. 9 (4): 271–285. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0887-3828(1995)9:4(271).
Issa, M. A., C. L. R. Do Valle, H. A. Abdalla, S. Islam, and M. A. Issa. 2003. “Performance of transverse joint grout materials in full-depth precast concrete bridge deck systems.” PCI J. 48 (4): 92–103. https://doi.org/10.15554/pcij.07012003.92.103.
Kim, J. H. J., J. W. Nam, H. J. Kim, J. H. Kim, S. B. Kim, and K. J. Byun. 2008. “Overview and applications of precast, prestressed concrete adjacent box-beam bridges in South Korea.” PCI J. 53 (4): 83–107. https://doi.org/10.15554/pcij.07012008.83.107.
Miller, R. A., G. M. Hlavacs, T. Long, and A. Greuel. 1999. “Full-scale testing of shear keys for adjacent box girder bridges.” PCI J. 44 (6): 80–90. https://doi.org/10.15554/pcij.11011999.80.90.
Naito, C., L. Jones, and I. Hodgson. 2011. “Development of flexural strength rating procedures for adjacent prestressed concrete box girder bridges.” J. Bridge Eng. 16 (5): 662–670. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0000186.
Ohio DOT. 2013. Ohio construction and material specifications. Columbus, OH: Office of Structural Engineering.
PCI (Precast/Prestressed Concrete Institute). 2010. PCI design handbook: Precast and prestressed concrete. 7th ed. Chicago: PCI.
Roeder, C. W. 2003. “Proposed design method for thermal bridge movements.” J. Bridge Eng. 8 (1): 12–19. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0702(2003)8:1(12).
Russell, H. G. 2009. Adjacent precast concrete box-beam bridges: Connection details. Vol. 393. Washington, DC: Transportation Research Board.
Russell, H. G. 2011. “Adjacent precast concrete box-beam bridges: State of the practice.” PCI J. 56 (1): 75–91. https://doi.org/10.15554/pcij.01012011.75.91.
Simulia. 2014. Abaqus user manual 6.14. Providence, RI: Simulia.
Steinberg, E., J. Huffman, J. Ubbing, and O. Giraldo-Londono. 2013. “Finite element modeling of adjacent prestressed concrete box-beams.” In Proc., PCI National Bridge Conf. Chicago: Precast/Prestressed Concrete Institute.
Yuan, J., and B. Graybeal. 2016. “Full-scale testing of shear key details for precast concrete box-beam bridges.” J. Bridge Eng. 21 (9): 04016043. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0000906.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities
Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities
Volume 32Issue 6December 2018

History

Received: Dec 7, 2017
Accepted: May 29, 2018
Published online: Sep 3, 2018
Published in print: Dec 1, 2018
Discussion open until: Feb 3, 2019

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Ph.D. Candidate, Civil Engineering Dept., Russ College of Engineering and Technology, Ohio Univ., 102 Stocker Center, Athens, OH 45701 (corresponding author). ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8348-9996. Email: [email protected]; [email protected]
Shad Sargand, M.ASCE [email protected]
Russ Professor, Civil Engineering Dept., Russ College of Engineering and Technology, Ohio Univ., 208 Stocker Engineering Center, Athens, OH 45701. Email: [email protected]
Issam Khoury, M.ASCE [email protected]
Assistant Professor, Civil Engineering Dept., 222 Stocker Engineering Center, Russ College of Engineering and Technology, Ohio Univ., Athens, OH 45701. Email: [email protected]
Fouad T. Al Rikabi, S.M.ASCE [email protected]
Ph.D. Candidate, Civil Engineering Dept., Russ College of Engineering and Technology, Ohio Univ., 102 Stocker Center, Athens, OH 45701. Email: [email protected]; [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share