Characterization of Steel Bridge Superstructure Deterioration through Data Mining Techniques
Publication: Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities
Volume 32, Issue 5
Abstract
With a significant number of steel bridges approaching the end of their service life, understanding deterioration characteristics will help bridge stakeholders better prioritize bridge maintenance, repairs, and rehabilitation as well as help with budget planning. This paper applies data mining techniques including logistic regression, decision trees, neural networks, gradient boosting, and support vector machine to the United States’ national bridge inventory to estimate the probability of steel bridge superstructures reaching deficiency. A focused subset of data was created based on the defined scope of the research: design material (steel), type of design (stringer/multibeam or girder), and deck type (cast-in-place concrete). The predictors of the model include age, average daily traffic, design load, maximum span length, owner, location, and structure length. The magnitude that these factors contribute to the likelihood of a steel bridge superstructure’s deficiency was identified. Outcomes of the analysis afford bridge stakeholders the opportunity to better understand the factors that are correlated to steel bridge deterioration as well as provide a means to assess risks of superstructure deficiency for the sake of prioritizing bridge maintenance, repair, and rehabilitation.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
AASHTO. 1997. AASHTO guide for commonly recognized (CoRe) structural elements. Washington, DC: AASHTO.
ASCE. 2017. “2017 report card of America’s infrastructure.” Accessed June 21, 2017. https://www.infrastructurereportcard.org/cat-item/bridges/.
Avşar, Ö., W. Nicholas Marianos, Jr., and A. Caner. 2011. “Identifying bridge rehabilitation needs using an analytical method developed for interpretation of visual inspection data.” J. Perform. Constr. Facil. 26 (3): 312–319. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CF.1943-5509.0000233.
Bektas, B. A., A. Carriquiry, and O. Smadi. 2013. “Using classification trees for predicting national bridge inventory condition ratings.” J. Infrastruct. Syst. 19 (4): 425–433. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)IS.1943-555X.0000143.
Bektaş, B. A. 2017. “Use of recursive partitioning to predict national bridge inventory condition ratings from national bridge elements condition data.” Trans. Res. Rec. 2612: 29–38. https://doi.org/10.3141/2612-04.
Berry, M. J. A., and G. Linoff. 2011. Data mining techniques: For marketing, sales, and customer relationship management. Indianapolis: Wiley.
Bu, G. P., J. H. Lee, H. Guan, Y. C. Loo, and M. Blumenstein. 2015. “Prediction of long-term bridge performance: Integrated deterioration approach with case studies.” J. Perform. Constr. Facil. 29 (3): 04014089. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CF.1943-5509.0000591.
Caner, A., A. M. Yanmaz, A. Yakut, O. Avsar, and T. Yilmaz. 2008. “Service life assessment of existing highway bridges with no planned regular inspections.” J. Perform. Constr. Facil. 22 (2): 108–114. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0887-3828(2008)22:2(108).
Chou, J.-S., C.-K. Chiu, M. Farfoura, and I. Al-Taharwa. 2011. “Optimizing the prediction accuracy of concrete compressive strength based on a comparison of data-mining techniques.” J. Comput. Civ. Eng. 25 (3): 242–253. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CP.1943-5487.0000088.
Christie, P., G. Jim, J. Thompson, and C. Well. 2011. Applied analytics using SAS Enterprise Miner course notes. Cary, NC: SAS Institute.
Contreras-Nieto, C. 2014. “Development of linear models to predict superstructure ratings of steel and prestressed concrete bridges.” Master’s dissertation, ProQuest, UMI Dissertations Publishing.
Contreras-Nieto, C., P. Lewis, and Y. Shan. 2016. “Developing predictive models of superstructure ratings for steel and prestressed concrete bridges.” In Proc., Construction Research Congress 2016, 859–868. Reston, VA: ASCE.
DeVille, B., and P. Neville. 2013. Decision trees for analytics using SAS Enterprise Miner. Cary, NC: SAS Institute.
Farhey, D. 2015. “Operational structural performances of bridge types by deterioration trends.” J. Perform. Constr. Facil. 29 (2): 04014056. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CF.1943-5509.0000541.
FHWA. 1995. “Recording and coding guide for the structure inventory and appraisal of the nation’s bridges.” Accessed June 5, 2018. https://www.fhwa.dot.gov/bridge/mtguide.pdf.
FHWA (Federal Highway Administration). 1995. Recording and coding guide for the structure inventory and appraisal of the nation’s bridges. Washington, DC: USDOT.
Gattulli, V., and L. Chiaramonte. 2005. “Condition assessment by visual inspection for a bridge management system.” Comput.-Aided Civ. Infrastruct. Eng. 20 (2): 95–107. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8667.2005.00379.x.
Hagan, M. T., H. B. Demuth, M. H. Beale, and O. De Jesús. 1996. Neural network design. Boston: PWS.
Hammad, A., J. Yan, and B. Mostofi. 2007. “Recent development of bridge management systems in Canada.” In Proc., 2007 Annual Conf. and Exhibition of the Transportation Association of Canada: Transportation—An Economic Enabler (Les Transports: Un Levier Economique). Ottawa: Transportation Association of Canada.
He, H., and E. A. Garcia. 2009. “Learning from imbalanced data.” IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. 21 (9): 1263–1284. https://doi.org/10.1109/TKDE.2008.239.
Kim, Y. J., and D. K. Yoon. 2010. “Identifying critical sources of bridge deterioration in cold regions through the constructed bridges in North Dakota.” J. Bridge Eng. 15 (5): 542–552. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0000087.
Kleinbaum, D. G., and M. Klein 2003. Logistic regression: A self-learning text. 3rd ed. New York: Springer.
Matthiesen, R. 2010. Bioinformatics methods in clinical research. Totowa, NJ: Humana.
Milley, A. H. S., J. D. Williams, and S. John. 1998. Data mining and the case for sampling. Cary, NC: SAS Institute.
Miyamoto, A., K. Kawamura, and H. Nakamura. 2000. “Bridge management system and maintenance optimization for existing bridges.” Comput.- Aided Civ. Infrastruct. Eng. 15 (1): 45–55. https://doi.org/10.1111/0885-9507.00170.
NCHRP. 2004. “The mechanistic-empirical pavement design guide.” Accessed August 9, 2017. http://onlinepubs.trb.org/onlinepubs/archive/mepdg/home.htm.
Omran, B. A., Q. Chen, and R. Jin. 2016. “Comparison of data mining techniques for predicting compressive strength of environmentally friendly concrete.” J. Comput. Civ. Eng. 30 (6): 04016029. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CP.1943-5487.0000596.
Potts, W. P., and J. M. Patetta. 2002. Predictive modeling using logistic regression course notes. Cary, NC: SAS Institute.
Pozzolo, A. D., O. Caelen, R. A. Johnson, and G. Bontempi. 2015. “Calibrating probability with undersampling for unbalanced classification.” In Proc., 2015 IEEE Symp. Series on Computational Intelligence, 159–166. Piscataway, NJ: IEEE.
Saeed, T. U., M. Moomen, A. Ahmed, J. Murillo-Hoyos, M. Volovski, and S. Labi. 2017. “Performance evaluation and life prediction of highway concrete bridge superstructure across design types.” J. Perform. Constr. Facil. 31 (5): 04017052. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CF.1943-5509.0001051.
Schulz, A., A. Zia, and C. Koliba. 2017. “Adapting bridge infrastructure to climate change: Institutionalizing resilience in intergovernmental transportation planning processes in the northeastern USA.” Mitigation Adaptation Strategies Global Change 22 (1): 175–198. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11027-015-9672-x.
She, T. H., and M. Sarshar. 1999. “A geographic information system (GIS)–based bridge management system.” Comput.-Aided Civ. Infrastruct. Eng. 14 (6): 417–427. https://doi.org/10.1111/0885-9507.00160.
Tang, P., O. Kanaan, J. Wnag, J. Oh, and V. Kwigizile. 2012. “Statistical identification of items important for evaluating bridge conditions.” Accessed August 1, 2012. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Pingbo_Tang/publication/268582948_Frequency_Analysis_of_Bridge_Condition_Explanatory_Data_Items_for_Customized_Data_Collection_and_Bridge_Management/links/54f5e2000cf2ca5efefd4430.pdf.
Tarefder, R. A., N. Sumee, and C. Storlie. 2014. “Study of MEPDG sensitivity using nonparametric regression procedures.” J. Comput. Civ. Eng. 28 (1): 134–144. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CP.1943-5487.0000239.
Thoonen, G., K. Hufkens, J. V. Borre, T. Spanhove, and P. Scheunders. 2012. “Accuracy assessment of contextual classification results for vegetation mapping.” Int. J. Appl. Earth Obs. Geoinf. 15 (1): 7–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jag.2011.05.013.
USDOT. 2013. “Federal Highway Administration national bridge inventory.” Accessed March 11, 2014. https://www.fhwa.dot.gov/bridge/nbi/ascii2013.cfm.
USDOT. 2014. “Federal Highway Administration national bridge inventory.” Accessed June 1, 2015. https://www.fhwa.dot.gov/bridge/nbi/ascii2014.cfm.
USDOT. 2016. “Federal highway administration national bridge inventory.” Accessed April 25, 2017. https://www.fhwa.dot.gov/bridge/nbi/ascii.cfm.
Veshosky, D., C. Beidleman, G. Buetow, and M. Demir. 1994. “Comparative analysis of bridge superstructure deterioration.” J. Struct. Eng. 120 (7): 2123–2136. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1994)120:7(2123).
Yuan, S. 2015. “Random gradient boosting for predicting conditional quantiles.” J. Stat. Comput. Simul. 85 (18): 3716–3726. https://doi.org/10.1080/00949655.2014.1002099.
Zhu, Z., and I. Brilakis. 2010. “Parameter optimization for automated concrete detection in image data.” Autom. Constr. 19 (7): 944–953. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2010.06.008.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
©2018 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: Dec 29, 2017
Accepted: Mar 27, 2018
Published online: Jun 29, 2018
Published in print: Oct 1, 2018
Discussion open until: Nov 29, 2018
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.