Performance of NDT Techniques in Appraising Condition of Reinforced Concrete Bridge Decks
Publication: Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities
Volume 31, Issue 6
Abstract
The colossal backlog of deteriorated concrete bridge decks draws attention to the importance of nondestructive testing (NDT) technologies as potential bridge condition assessment tools. The selection of NDT techniques to evaluate the current state of bridge decks is a decision variable. The foremost objective of this study was to conduct a comparative analysis of the common NDT methods for detecting subsurface defects in concrete bridge decks, particularly rebar corrosion, delamination, and cracking. Thus, impact echo (IE), ultrasonic pulse echo (UPE), ground-penetrating radar (GPR), infrared thermography (IRT), and half-cell potential (HCP) were appraised and ranked from the perspective of five performance measures: capability, speed, simplicity, accuracy, and cost. The information sought to identify the significance of the factors affecting the analysis was collected through a survey questionnaire of bridge engineers having extensive NDT experience. In order to incorporate the imprecise information and vagueness of human judgment in decision-making, the fuzzy analytical hierarchy process (FAHP) was employed. The fuzzy preference program (FPP) nonlinear method was adopted to determine the relative weights using MATLAB. The outcomes revealed that each technology can address specific bridge challenges. For instance, some technologies are associated with simplicity and lower cost, whereas others excel in accuracy or speed. Thus, a decision regarding the selection of a technology is guided by the objectives of the assessment and the most important performance parameters. The proposed methodology should assist bridge stakeholders in the rational appraising of NDT technologies for bridge decks based on a wide scope of information sources.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
AASHTO. (2011). Manual for bridge evaluation, 2nd Ed., Washington, DC.
ACI (American Concrete Institute). (2013). “Report on nondestructive test methods for evaluation of concrete in structures.” ACI 228.2R-13, Farmington Hills, MI, 83.
Algernon, D., Hiltunen, D., and Ferraro, C. (2010). “Validation of nondestructive testing equipment for concrete.”, Univ. of Florida, Gainesville, FL, 142.
Alt, D., and Meggers, D. (1996). “Determination of bridge deck subsurface anomalies using infrared thermography and ground penetrating radar.”, Kansas Dept. of Transportation, Topeka, KS, 18.
Arndt, R., Jalinoos, F., Cui, J., and Huston, D. (2010). “Periodic NDE for bridge maintenance.” Proc., Structural Faults and Repair Conf., Edinburgh, Scotland.
ASCE Infrastructure Report Card. (2013). “Bridges.” ⟨https://www.infrastructurereportcard.org/cat-item/bridges/⟩ (Feb. 21, 2016).
Barnes, C., and Trottier, J. (2000). “Ground-penetrating radar for network- level concrete deck repair management.” J. Transp. Eng., 257–262.
Baruch, Y. (1999). “Response rate in academic studies—A comparative analysis.” J. Hum. Relations, 52(4), 421–438.
Bhattacharyya, R., Kumar, P., and Kar, S. (2011). “Fuzzy R&D portfolio selection of interdependent projects.” J. Comput. Math. Appl., 62(10), 3857–3870.
Buckley, J. J. (1985). “Fuzzy hierarchical analysis.” J. Fuzzy Sets Syst., 17(3), 233–247.
Canadian Infrastructure Report Card. (2016). “Assessing the health of communities infrastructure.” ⟨http://www.canadainfrastructure.ca⟩ (Apr. 2, 2016).
Chang, D. Y. (1996). “Application of the extent analysis method on fuzzy AHP.” Eur. J. Oper. Res., 95(3), 649–655.
Chang, P. T., and Lee, J. H. (2012). “A fuzzy DEA and knapsack formulation integrated model for project selection.” J. Comput. Oper. Res., 39(1), 112–125.
Clark, M. R., McCann, D. M., and Forde, M. C. (2003). “Application of infrared thermography to the non-destructive testing of concrete and masonry bridges.” J. NDT&E Int., 36(4), 265–275.
Csutora, R., and Buckley, J. J. (2001). “Fuzzy hierarchical analysis: The Lambda-Max method.” J. Fuzzy Sets Syst., 120(2), 181–195.
Delatte, N. (2009). Failure, distress and repair of concrete structures, Woodhead Publishing, Boca Raton, FL, 335.
Gucunski, N., et al. (2013). “Non-destructive testing to identify concrete bridge deck deterioration.” Proc., 92nd Annual Meeting, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC, 96.
Gucunski, N., Kee, S., La, H., Basily, B., Maher, A., and Ghasemi, H. (2015). “Implementation of a fully autonomous platform for assessment of concrete bridge decks RABIT.” Proc., Structure Congress, ASCE, Reston, VA, 367–378.
Gucunski, N., and Nazarian, S. (2010). “Material characterization and condition assessment of reinforced concrete bridge decks by complementary NDE technologies.” Proc., Structures Congress, ASCE, Reston, VA, 429–439.
Hesse, A., Atadero, R., and Ozbek, M. (2015). “Uncertainty in common NDE techniques for use in risk-based bridge inspection planning: Existing data.” J. Bridge Eng., 04015004.
Huang, C., Chu, P., and Chiang, Y. (2008). “A fuzzy AHP application in government-sponsored R&D project selection.” Int. J. Manage. Sci., 36(6), 1038–1052.
Huo, L., Lan, J., and Wang, Z. (2011). “New parametric prioritization methods for an analytical hierarchy process based on a pairwise comparison matrix.” J. Math. Comput. Modell., 54(11–12), 2736–2749.
Jain, K. K., and Bhattacharjee, B. (2012). “Application of fuzzy concepts to the visual assessment of deteriorating reinforced concrete structures.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 399–408.
Lorterapong, P., and Moselhi, O. (1996). “Project-network scheduling using fuzzy set theory.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 308–318.
MATLAB [Computer software]. MathWorks, Natick, MA.
Mikhailov, L. (2004). “Group prioritization in the AHP by fuzzy preference programming method.” J. Comput. Oper. Res., 31(2), 293–301.
Oh, T., Kee, S.-H., Arndt, W., Popovics, S., and Zhu, J. (2013). “Comparison of NDT methods for assessment of a concrete bridge deck.” J. Eng. Mech., 305–314.
Penttala, V. (2009). “Causes and mechanisms of deterioration in reinforced concrete.” Chapter 1, Failure, distress and repair of concrete structures, N. Delatte, ed., 1st Ed., Woodhead Publishing, Cambridge, U.K., 3–31.
Saaty, T. L. (1980). The analytic hierarchy process: Planning, priority setting and resource allocation, McGraw-Hill, New York, 237.
Sasmal, S., and Ramanjaneyulu, K. (2008). “Condition evaluation of existing reinforced concrete bridges using fuzzy based analytic hierarchy approach.” J. Expert Syst. Appl., 35(3), 1430–1443.
Scott, M., et al. (2003). “A comparison of nondestructive evaluation methods for bridge deck assessment.” J. NDT&E Int., 36(4), 245–255.
Thompson, P., Ellis, R., Hong, K., and Merlo, T. (2003). “Implementation of Ontario bridge management system.” Proc., 9th Int. Bridge Management Conf., Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC, 112–127.
Van Laarhoven, P. J. M., and Pedrycz, W. (1983). “A fuzzy extension of Saaty’s priority theory.” J. Fuzzy Sets Syst., 11(1/3), 229–241.
Wang, Y., and Elhag, T. (2008). “Evidential reasoning approach for bridge condition assessment.” J. Expert Syst. Appl., 34(1), 689–699.
Washer, G. (2016). Infrared technologies for bridge maintenance, Univ. of Missouri, Columbia, MO, 35.
Wood, J. C., and Rens, K. L. (2006). “Nondestructive testing of the Lawrence Street Bridge.” Proc., Structures Congress, ASCE, Reston, VA, 1–15.
Yehia, S., Abudayyeh, O., Nabulsi, S., and Abdel-Qader, I. (2007). “Detection of common defects in concrete bridge decks using NDE techniques.” J. Bridge Eng., 215–225.
Yong, H. Z., and Ng, K. E. (2003). “Evaluation of concrete structures by advances non-destructive test methods—Impact echo, impulse response test and radar survey.” Proc., NDT-CE Conf., Berlin.
Zadeh, L. A. (1965). “Fuzzy sets. Information and control.” J. Inf. Control, 8(3), 338–353.
Zhou, X. (2012). “Fuzzy analytical network process implementation with MATLAB.” Chapter 6, MATLAB: A fundamental tool for scientific computing and engineering applications, V. N. Katsikis, ed., Vol. 3, InTech, West Palm Beach, FL, 133–160.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities
Volume 31 • Issue 6 • December 2017
Copyright
©2017 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: Dec 28, 2016
Accepted: May 23, 2017
Published online: Sep 18, 2017
Published in print: Dec 1, 2017
Discussion open until: Feb 18, 2018
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.